327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12666682)
1. The birds, the bees, and the deep freeze: is there international consensus in the debate over assisted reproductive technologies?
Pitrolo EA
Houst J Int Law; 1996; 19(1):147-206. PubMed ID: 12666682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. President's Council on Bioethics: reproduction and responsibility.
Doerflinger RM
Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2004; 4(3):461-9. PubMed ID: 15452926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Medico-legal aspects of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer practice.
Schenker JG; Frenkel DA
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1987 Jul; 41(7):405-13. PubMed ID: 11658938
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. New reproductive technologies: international feminist concerns.
Kanno N
Sci People; 1987; 19(4):5-8,27. PubMed ID: 11655838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The process of regulating assisted reproductive technologies: what we can learn from our neighbors--what translates and what does not.
Lorio KV
Loyola Law Rev; 1999; 45(2):247-68. PubMed ID: 16622956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Assisted reproduction--Islamic views on the science of procreation.
Ahmad NH
Eubios J Asian Int Bioeth; 2003 Mar; 13(2):59-61. PubMed ID: 17117542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Report of the Warnock Committee on Human Fertilisation and Embryology.
Priest JA
Mod Law Rev; 1985 Jan; 48(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 16100813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro fertilization and embryos: the need for international guidelines.
Fiandaca S
Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1998; 8(2):337-404. PubMed ID: 12465644
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Matters of life and death: inheritance consequences of reproductive technologies.
Shapo HS
Hofstra Law Rev; 1997; 25(4):1091-220. PubMed ID: 11858286
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The politics of bioethics.
Cohen E; Kristol W
Hum Life Rev; 2004; 30(2):7-15. PubMed ID: 15540375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The ever-widening gap between the science of artificial reproductive technology and the laws which govern that technology.
Havins WE; Dalessio JJ
De Paul Law Rev; 1999; 48(4):825-66. PubMed ID: 12484397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies: a critique of the final report.
Shanner L
Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1994 Mar; 27(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 11659921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Regulation of assisted reproductive technology in the Netherlands.
te Braake TA
Tex Int Law J; 2000; 35(1):93-122. PubMed ID: 12656080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. What is an embryo?
Kiessling AA
Conn Law Rev; 2004; 36(4):1051-92. PubMed ID: 15868674
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Australian report dooms embryo 'heirs' but reprieve may follow public outcry.
Miller C
Med World News; 1984 Oct; 25(20):61-2. PubMed ID: 11645534
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Artificial techniques of procreation: legal and moral aspects.
Shifman P
Isr Law Rev; 1993; 27(4):600-9. PubMed ID: 14682331
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Pandora's progeny: ethical issues in assisted human reproduction.
Cameron NM
Fam Law Q; 2005; 39(3):745-79. PubMed ID: 16610155
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Catholic teaching and the law concerning the new reproductive technologies.
Alvare HM
Fordham Urban Law J; 2002 Nov; 30(1):107-34. PubMed ID: 15868664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Problems with the regulation of assisted reproductive technology: a clinician's perspective.
Baker HW
J Law Med; 2002 May; 9(4):457-69. PubMed ID: 12194477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Human cloning and human dignity: an ethical inquiry--policy recommendations.
President's Council on Bioethics (U.S.)
J Int Bioethique; 2003; 14(3-4):153-69. PubMed ID: 15281206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
