These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12666685)

  • 1. The author of Roe.
    Rao R
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1998; 26(1):21-40. PubMed ID: 12666685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Abortion politics: writing for an audience of one.
    Estrich SR; Sullivan KM
    Univ PA Law Rev; 1989 Nov; 138(1):119-55. PubMed ID: 11656496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
    Peterfy A
    J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The legacy of Justice William Brennan.
    Glendon MA; Treene EW
    Hum Life Rev; 1998; 24(1):65-76. PubMed ID: 11660508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: devaluing the right to choose.
    Binion G
    Women Polit; 1991; 11(2):41-60. PubMed ID: 11656100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court -- amici for appellees.
    Annas GJ
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):169-203. PubMed ID: 11644396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Donohue lecture series: "Roe v. Wade: past and future".
    Weddington S
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1990; 24(3):601-20. PubMed ID: 16047442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Court-ordered cesareans: can a pregnant woman refuse?
    Leavine BA
    Houst Law Rev; 1992; 29(1):185-218. PubMed ID: 11656666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perspectives on the abortion controversy: amici for appellees -- Brief for bioethicists for privacy as amicus curiae supporting appellees Webster and women's equality Webster and the fundamental right to make medical decisions Abortion counseling and the First Amendment: open questions after Webster Brief for 885 law professors in support of maintaining adherence to the Roe decision.
    Annas GJ; Glantz LH; Mariner WK; Johnsen D; Wilder MJ; Orentlicher D; Pine RN; Michelman FI; Redlich N; Neuwirth SR; Carty-Bennia D
    Am J Law Med; 1990 Jan; 15(2-3):169-203. PubMed ID: 11656584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High court asks sharp questions in abortion case.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1989 Apr; ():A1, B14. PubMed ID: 11646764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The right to privacy: Roe v. Wade revisited.
    Smith PA
    Jurist; 1983; 43(2):289-317. PubMed ID: 16086474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Envisioning a future for reproductive liberty: strategies for making the rights real.
    Pine RN; Law SA
    Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1992; 27(2):407-63. PubMed ID: 11656200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abortion rights after South Dakota.
    McDonagh E
    Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. roe v. Wade: the rhetoric of fetal life.
    Hagan MR
    Cent States Speech J; 1976; 27(3):192-9. PubMed ID: 11663703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Social commentary: values and legal personhood.
    Parness JA
    West VA Law Rev; 1981; 83(3):487-503. PubMed ID: 11655572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Forced labor: a thirteenth amendment defense of abortion.
    Koppelman A
    Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1990; 84(2):480-535. PubMed ID: 11656392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Losing the negative right of privacy: building sexual and reproductive freedom.
    Copelon R
    Rev Law Soc Change; 1990-1991; 18(1):15-50. PubMed ID: 11656169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Of causes and clients: two tales of Roe v. Wade.
    McMunigal KC
    Hastings Law J; 1996 Mar; 47(3):779-819. PubMed ID: 11658088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the flight from reason in the Supreme Court.
    Linton PB
    St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):15-137. PubMed ID: 11656611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Doctors, patients and the Constitution: a theoretical analysis of the physician's role in "private" reproductive decisions.
    Appleton SF
    Wash Univ Law Q; 1985; 63(2):183-236. PubMed ID: 11656658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.