229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12666688)
1. How far can a state go to protect a fetus? The Rebecca Corneau story and the case for requiring Massachusetts to follow the U.S. Constitution.
Bower HR
Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 2001; 31(1):123-54. PubMed ID: 12666688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The free exercise rights of pregnant women who refuse medical treatment.
Cherry AL
Tenn Law Rev; 2002; 69(3):563-622. PubMed ID: 15378820
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Women's rights versus the protection of fetuses.
Warren MA
Midwest Med Ethics; 1991; 7(1):1, 3-7. PubMed ID: 16145788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Abortion rights after South Dakota.
McDonagh E
Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Maternal duties during pregnancy: toward a conceptual framework.
Sterns ML
New Engl Law Rev; 1985-1986; 21(3):595-634. PubMed ID: 16998992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Prenatal v. parental rights: what a difference an "a" makes.
Gallagher A
St Marys Law J; 1989; 21(2):301-24. PubMed ID: 16100799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court.
Bertz RC
West State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reply to Sarah Burns.
Colker R
Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():207-14. PubMed ID: 16032808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The proposed equal protection fix for abortion law: reflections on citizenship, gender, and the Constitution.
Allen AL
Harv J Law Public Policy; 1995; 18(21):419-55. PubMed ID: 11656571
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Validity, under Federal Constitution, of abortion laws.
Shapiro SR
US Supreme Court Rep; 1974; 35():735-69. PubMed ID: 11663483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Compelled hospitalization and treatment during pregnancy: mental health statutes as models for legislation to protect children from prenatal drug and alcohol exposure.
Wilton JM
Fam Law Q; 1991; 25(2):149-70. PubMed ID: 11659420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The body invaded: medical surveillance of women as reproducers.
Terry J
Social Rev; 1989; 89(3):13-43. PubMed ID: 11655979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A matter of life and death: pregnancy clauses in living will statutes.
Dyke MC
Boston Univ Law Rev; 1990 Nov; 70(5):867-87. PubMed ID: 12186075
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. From arguments to Supreme Court opinions in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
Kassop N
PS (Wash DC); 1993 Mar; 26(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12085874
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The right to privacy: Roe v. Wade revisited.
Smith PA
Jurist; 1983; 43(2):289-317. PubMed ID: 16086474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. New York v. Sullivan: shhh ... don't say the "a" word! Another outcome-oriented abortion decision.
Kendall CC
John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):753-70. PubMed ID: 16622962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Fetal interests vs. maternal rights: is the state going too far?
Trindel RM
Akron Law Rev; 1991; 24(3-4):743-62. PubMed ID: 16273672
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A jailed expectant mom--and a case of tangled rights.
Axtman K
Christ Sci Monitor (East Ed); 2000 Sep; 92(202):2. PubMed ID: 15586931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Legal issues: drug testing of postpartum women and newborns as the basis for civil and criminal proceedings.
Moss KL
Clgh Rev; 1990 Mar; 23(11):1406-14. PubMed ID: 11659232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The invalidity of Canada's abortion law--section 251 of the Criminal Code.
Picher PC
Crim Rep Can New Ser; 1974; 24():1-31. PubMed ID: 11663529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
