229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12666688)
21. Who gets to choose? Responses to the foetal/maternal conflict.
Hyams R
E Law; 1995 Dec; 2(3):E7. PubMed ID: 16969923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The right of privacy and restraints on abortion under the "undue burden" test: a jurisprudential comparison of Planned Parenthood v. Casey with European practice and Italian law.
Ross CS
Indiana Int Comp Law Rev; 1993; 3():199-231. PubMed ID: 12091926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The putative father's rights after Roe v. Wade.
Tapovatz WE
St Marys Law J; 1974; 6(2):407-20. PubMed ID: 11663502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Abortion: the father's rights.
Gilbert RA
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1973; 42(3):441-67. PubMed ID: 11664234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Parental notification of abortion and minors' rights under the Montana constitution.
Hayhurst MB
Mont Law Rev; 1997; 58(2):565-98. PubMed ID: 16180294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The validity of legislative restrictions on abortion under the Oregon constitution.
Tweedt DE
Temple Law Rev; 1992; 65(4):1349-71. PubMed ID: 16047444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Compelled medical treatment of pregnant women: the balancing of maternal and fetal rights.
Harris P
Clevel State Law Rev; 2001; 49(1):133-61. PubMed ID: 15212015
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Norplant bonuses and the unconstitutional conditions doctrine.
Coale DS
Tex Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 71(1):189-215. PubMed ID: 11656313
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. "For their own good": civil commitment of alcohol and drug-dependent pregnant women.
Chavkin DF
S D Law Rev; 1992; 37(2):224-88. PubMed ID: 11657122
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The maternal-fetal rights dilemma: honoring a woman's choice of medical care during pregnancy.
Arch RR
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1996; 12(2):637-73. PubMed ID: 8666737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Abortion and the law in 1980.
Paul EW; Schaap P
NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1980; 25(3):497-525. PubMed ID: 11664083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. From conception until birth: exploring the maternal duty to protect fetal health.
Cook M
Wash Univ Law Q; 2002; 80(4):1307-40. PubMed ID: 15164743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Haunting shadows from the rubble of Roe's right of privacy.
Haley JN
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1974; 9(1):145-84. PubMed ID: 11664401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. More thoughts on the physician's constitutional role in abortion and related choices.
Appleton SF
Wash Univ Law Q; 1988; 66(3):499-522. PubMed ID: 11659171
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Whose right to life? Implications of Roe v. Wade.
Cane MB
Fam Law Q; 1973; 7(4):413-32. PubMed ID: 11663407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. At what cost?: an argument against mandatory AZT treatment of HIV-positive pregnant women.
Halem SC
Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1997; 32(2):492-528. PubMed ID: 16200699
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Pregnant substance abusers: a problem that won't go away.
Swenson VJ; Crabbe C
St Marys Law J; 1994; 25(2):623-73. PubMed ID: 11652732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Consensual sex without assuming the risk of carrying an unwanted fetus; another foundation for the right to an abortion.
Walen A
Brooklyn Law Rev; 1997; 63():1051-140. PubMed ID: 12173635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Abortion and birth control--right to abortion and regulation thereof: the United States Supreme Court invalidates a statute banning partial birth abortions: Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914 (2000).
Joersz M
N D Law Rev; 2001; 77(2):345-73. PubMed ID: 12956123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Reconciling fetal/maternal conflicts.
Kim RH
Ida Law Rev; 1990-1991; 27(2):223-48. PubMed ID: 16032814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
