These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12666688)

  • 41. Pregnant embodiment and women's autonomy rights in law: an analysis of the language and politics of Winnipeg Child and Family Services v. D.F.G.
    Randall M
    Sask Law Rev; 1999; 62(2):515-42. PubMed ID: 12769105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The Supreme Court and abortion rights.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2201-7. PubMed ID: 17476003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. What about my right to privacy? Where the Court went wrong in Ferguson v. City of Charleston.
    Barton EF
    Brooklyn Law Rev; 2001; 67(1):261-92. PubMed ID: 12645550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Restrictions on women's right to abortion: informed consent, spousal consent, and record keeping provisions.
    Karg B
    Womens Rights Law Report; 1978; 5(1):35-51. PubMed ID: 11665035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. State v. Oakley: infringing on women's reproductive rights.
    Schehr AR
    Wis Womens Law J; 2003; 18(2):281-97. PubMed ID: 15568247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Constitutional law--substantive due process--abortion--reasonable statutory recordkeeping and reporting requirements upheld.
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1976; 1976(4):977-99. PubMed ID: 11664779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights.
    Reilly EA
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Conceivable sterilization: a constitutional analysis of a Norplant/Depo-Provera welfare condition.
    Smith KA
    Indiana Law J; 2002; 77(2):389-418. PubMed ID: 15174441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. byrn and Roe: the threshold question and juridical review.
    Riga PJ
    Cathol Lawyer; 1978; 23(4):309-31. PubMed ID: 11664059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Jon O. Newman and the abortion decisions: a remarkable first year.
    Hurwitz AD
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 2002-2003; 46(1-2):231-47. PubMed ID: 16493839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Federal funds for abortion.
    Packwood RW
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1979 Jul; 125(98):S9850-74. PubMed ID: 11664023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Compelling pregnancy at death's door.
    Taylor KA
    Columbia J Gend Law; 1997; 7(1):85-165. PubMed ID: 16184655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Protection of the rights of pregnant women in prisons and detention facilities.
    McHugh GA
    New Engl J Prison Law; 1980; 6(2):231-63. PubMed ID: 11655730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Punitive versus public health oriented responses to drug use by pregnant women.
    Schroedel JR; Fiber P
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():217-35. PubMed ID: 12669331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The phoenix of abortional freedom: is a penumbral or Ninth-Amendment right about to arise from the nineteenth-century legislative ashes of a fourteenth-century common-law liberty?
    Means CC
    N Y Law Forum; 1971; 17(2):335-410. PubMed ID: 16602212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. After Ayotte: the need to defend abortion rights with renewed "purpose.".
    Harv Law Rev; 2006 Jun; 119(8):2552-73. PubMed ID: 16827220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Amendment No. 2413 [(abortion funding[.
    Weicker LP
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1980 Sep; 126(152):S13703-11. PubMed ID: 11664172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Constitutional law--a new Constitutional right to an abortion.
    Watt RL
    North Carol Law Rev; 1973 Oct; 51(6):1573-84. PubMed ID: 11663419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. What "choice" do they have?: protecting pregnant minors' reproductive rights using state constitutions.
    Weissmann R
    Annu Surv Am Law; 1999; 1999(1):129-67. PubMed ID: 11958234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. State constitutional privacy rights post Webster--broader protection against abortion restrictions?
    Ezzard MM
    Denver Univ Law Rev; 1990; 67(3):401-19. PubMed ID: 15999439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.