320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12666690)
1. End-of-life decision making, therapeutic jurisprudence, and preventive law: hierarchical v. consensus-based decision-making model.
Hafemeister TL
Ariz Law Rev; 1999; 41(2):329-73. PubMed ID: 12666690
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Maryland Health Care Decisions Act: achieving the right balance?
Hoffman DE
MD Law Rev; 1994; 53(4):1064-130. PubMed ID: 12599347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Alzheimer's: decisions in terminal care.
Cassel CK; Hays JR; Lynn J
Patient Care; 1991 Nov; 25(18):125-37. PubMed ID: 11659603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Managing conflict at the end of life.
Bloche MG
N Engl J Med; 2005 Jun; 352(23):2371-3. PubMed ID: 15944420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. No-code orders vs. resuscitation: the decision to withhold life-prolonging treatment from the terminally ill.
Allan SM
Wayne Law Rev; 1979 Nov; 26(1):139-72. PubMed ID: 11661826
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Decisionmaking at the end of life: patients with Alzheimer's or other dementias.
Francis LP
Georgia Law Rev; 2001; 35(2):539-92. PubMed ID: 15119319
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Maryland's 1993 Health Care Decisions Act--implications for health care practitioners.
Levenson SA
MD Law Rev; 1994; 53(4):1131-57. PubMed ID: 12599348
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. In the shadow of Karen Quinlan.
Bennett SA
Trial; 1976 Sep; 12(9):36-41. PubMed ID: 11664653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The precarious role of the courts: surrogate health care decisionmaking.
Fader JF
MD Law Rev; 1994; 53(4):1193-219. PubMed ID: 12599351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Decision-Making: At the End of Life and the Provision of Pretreatment Advice.
Pope TM; Richards BJ
J Bioeth Inq; 2015 Sep; 12(3):389-94. PubMed ID: 26160603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. An intimate passing: restoring the role of family and religion in dying.
Boozang KM
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1997; 58(3):549-617. PubMed ID: 16086506
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Advanced directives, the right to die and the common law: recent problems with blood transfusions.
Stewart C
Melb Univ Law Rev; 1999 Apr; 23(1):161-83. PubMed ID: 12678066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ethical issues at the end of life.
Young EW
Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1998; 9(2):267-88. PubMed ID: 16528859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Health care surrogate statutes: ethics pitfalls threaten the interests of incompetent patients.
Krupp AN
West VA Law Rev; 1998; 101(1):99-128. PubMed ID: 12774805
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Paradox and Pandora's box: the tragedy of current right-to-die jurisprudence.
Roach CA
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1991; 25(1):133-90. PubMed ID: 16145810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Care of the dying: the doctor and euthanasia.
Rizzo R; Yonder J
Linacre Q; 1974 Nov; 41(4):253-68. PubMed ID: 11662104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Persistent indeterminate state: reflections on the Wendland case.
Nelson LJ
Issues Ethics; 2003; 14(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 16175716
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. End-of-life decision making is more than rational.
Eliott JA; Olver IN
Commun Med; 2005; 2(1):21-34. PubMed ID: 16808705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The dying patient act, 2005: Israeli innovative legislation.
Steinberg A; Sprung CL
Isr Med Assoc J; 2007 Jul; 9(7):550-2. PubMed ID: 17710789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Health care representative consent legislation.
Falk TC
Willamette Law Rev; 1990; 26(2):299-343. PubMed ID: 16047453
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
