463 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12666857)
1. Evaluation of marginal microleakage in class II cavities: effect of microhybrid, flowable, and compactable resins.
Peris AR; Duarte S; de Andrade MF
Quintessence Int; 2003 Feb; 34(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 12666857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR
Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microleakage of four composite resin systems in class II restorations.
Majeed A; Osman YI; Al-Omari T
SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):484-8. PubMed ID: 20306869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of different restorative techniques on microleakage in Class II cavities with gingival wall in cementum.
Demarco FF; Ramos OL; Mota CS; Formolo E; Justino LM
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):253-9. PubMed ID: 11357567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
Payne JH
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of different drying methods for single step adhesive systems on microleakage of tooth colored restorations.
Owens BM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2003 Feb; 4(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 12595929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of postoperative bleaching on marginal leakage of resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer restorations at different delayed periods of exposure to carbamide peroxide.
Moosavi H; Ghavamnasiri M; Manari V
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Nov; 10(6):E009-16. PubMed ID: 20020076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of centripetal and incremental methods in Class II composite resin restorations on gingival microleakage.
Ghavamnasiri M; Moosavi H; Tahvildarnejad N
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 17277834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of rebonding on microleakage of class V aesthetic restorations.
Erhardt MC; Magalhães CS; Serra MC
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):396-402. PubMed ID: 12120778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microleakage of Class II packable resin composites lined with flowables: an in vitro study.
Neme AM; Maxson BB; Pink FE; Aksu MN
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(6):600-5. PubMed ID: 12413226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations.
Belli S; Inokoshi S; Ozer F; Pereira PN; Ogata M; Tagami J
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 11203780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Flowable composites as "filled adhesives:" a microleakage study.
Sensi LG; Marson FC; Monteiro S; Baratieri LN; Caldeira de Andrada MA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2004 Nov; 5(4):32-41. PubMed ID: 15558088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of three surface sealants on marginal sealing of Class V composite resin restorations.
Ramos RP; Chimello DT; Chinelatti MA; Dibb RG; Mondelli J
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):448-53. PubMed ID: 11203855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of two different polishing techniques on microleakage of new composites in Class V restorations.
Yalçin F; Korkmaz Y; Başeren M
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):18-25. PubMed ID: 17091136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of different polymerization methods on composite microleakage.
Deliperi S; Bardwell DN; Papathanasiou A
Am J Dent; 2003 Sep; 16 Spec No():73A-76A. PubMed ID: 14674504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of flowable composite lining and operator experience on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations.
Chuang SF; Liu JK; Chao CC; Liao FP; Chen YH
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Feb; 85(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 11208208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of flowable composite lining thickness on Class II composite restorations.
Chuang SF; Jin YT; Liu JK; Chang CH; Shieh DB
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(3):301-8. PubMed ID: 15195731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reducing microleakage in composite resin restorations: an in vitro study.
Unlu N; Krakaya S; Ozer F; Say EC
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2003 Dec; 11(4):171-5. PubMed ID: 14737794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three different methods to evaluate microleakage of packable composites in Class II restorations.
de Almeida JB; Platt JA; Oshida Y; Moore BK; Cochran MA; Eckert GJ
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):453-60. PubMed ID: 12877432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of different softstart polymerization techniques on marginal adaptation of Class V restorations.
Muangmingsuk A; Senawongse P; Yudhasaraprasithi S
Am J Dent; 2003 Apr; 16(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 12797570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
