106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12666942)
1. Millimeter marks and probe tip diameter standardisation from commercially available periodontal probes. A comparative study.
Neto JB; Filho GR; Tramontina VA; Sallum EA; Nociti FH; Sallum AW
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2001 Jul; 3(3):57-60. PubMed ID: 12666942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy and reproducibility of two manual periodontal probes. An in vitro study.
Buduneli E; Aksoy O; Köse T; Atilla G
J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Oct; 31(10):815-9. PubMed ID: 15367182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Marking width, calibration from tip and tine diameter of periodontal probes.
Van der Zee E; Davies EH; Newman HN
J Clin Periodontol; 1991 Aug; 18(7):516-20. PubMed ID: 1894745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of two pressure-sensitive periodontal probes and a manual periodontal probe in shallow and deep pockets.
Rams TE; Slots J
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1993 Dec; 13(6):520-9. PubMed ID: 8181912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of two automated periodontal probes and two probes with a conventional readout in periodontal maintenance patients.
Barendregt DS; Van der Velden U; Timmerman MF; van der Weijden GA
J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Apr; 33(4):276-82. PubMed ID: 16553636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Controlled force measurements of gingival attachment level made with the Toronto automated probe using electronic guidance.
Karim M; Birek P; McCulloch CA
J Clin Periodontol; 1990 Sep; 17(8):594-600. PubMed ID: 2212091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reproducibility of clinical attachment level and probing depth of a manual probe and a computerized electronic probe.
Alves Rde V; Machion L; Andia DC; Casati MZ; Sallum AW; Sallum EA
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2005 Jan; 7(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 15736893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of the cemento-enamel junction with three different probes: an "in vitro" model.
Barendregt DS; van der Velden U; Timmerman MF; Bulthuis HM; van der Weijden F
J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Mar; 36(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 19196382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measurement of the millimeter markings of periodontal probes.
Winter AA
J Periodontol; 1979 Sep; 50(9):483-5. PubMed ID: 290788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of a new periodontal probe tip design. A clinical and in vitro study.
Vartoukian SR; Palmer RM; Wilson RF
J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Oct; 31(10):918-25. PubMed ID: 15367198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A thin or thick probe handle: does it make a difference?
van Weringh M; Barendregt DS; Rosema NA; Timmerman MF; van der Weijden GA
Int J Dent Hyg; 2006 Aug; 4(3):140-4. PubMed ID: 16958742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationship between position of probe tip and periodontal tissues after periodontal surgery in dogs.
Hatakeyama Y; Uzel MI; Santana RB; Ruben MP
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2005 Jun; 25(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 16001737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Periodontal probing systems: a review of available equipment.
Ramachandra SS; Mehta DS; Sandesh N; Baliga V; Amarnath J
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2011 Mar; 32(2):71-7. PubMed ID: 21473303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro accuracy and reproducibility of automated and conventional periodontal probes.
Samuel ED; Griffiths GS; Petrie A
J Clin Periodontol; 1997 May; 24(5):340-5. PubMed ID: 9178114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Technical assessment of WHO-621 periodontal probe made in Brazil.
Rapp GE; Barbosa Júnior Ade A; Mendes AJ; Motta AC; Bião MA; Garcia RV
Braz Dent J; 2002; 13(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 11870966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of probes for microbial contamination following use in periodontal pockets of various depths.
Holt LA; Williams KB; Cobb CM; Keselyak NT; Jamison CL; Brand VS
J Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 75(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 15088872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of a conventional probe with electronic and manual pressure-regulated probes.
Perry DA; Taggart EJ; Leung A; Newburn E
J Periodontol; 1994 Oct; 65(10):908-13. PubMed ID: 7823271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Probe penetration in periodontal and peri-implant tissues. An experimental study in the beagle dog.
Abrahamsson I; Soldini C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Dec; 17(6):601-5. PubMed ID: 17092216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a new furcation stent as a fixed reference point for class II furcation measurements.
Laxman VK; Khatri M; Devaraj CG; Reddy K; Reddy R
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Mar; 10(2):18-25. PubMed ID: 19279968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between clinical and digital soft tissue measurements.
Schneider D; Ender A; Truninger T; Leutert C; Sahrmann P; Roos M; Schmidlin P
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(3):191-9. PubMed ID: 24341747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
