133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12667764)
1. Contributions of global and regional sources to mercury deposition in New York State.
Seigneur C; Lohman K; Vijayaraghavan K; Shia RL
Environ Pollut; 2003; 123(3):365-73. PubMed ID: 12667764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Global source attribution for mercury deposition in the United States.
Seigneur C; Vijayaraghavan K; Lohman K; Karamchandani P; Scott C
Environ Sci Technol; 2004 Jan; 38(2):555-69. PubMed ID: 14750733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impacts of anthropogenic emissions and meteorology on mercury deposition over lake vs land surface in upstate New York.
Ye Z; Mao H; Driscoll CT
Ecotoxicology; 2020 Dec; 29(10):1590-1601. PubMed ID: 31586287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On the effect of spatial resolution on atmospheric mercury modeling.
Seigneur C; Karamchandani P; Vijayaraghavan K; Lohman K; Shia RL; Levin L
Sci Total Environ; 2003 Mar; 304(1-3):73-81. PubMed ID: 12663173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Atmospheric mercury in the Canadian Arctic. Part II: insight from modeling.
Dastoor A; Ryzhkov A; Durnford D; Lehnherr I; Steffen A; Morrison H
Sci Total Environ; 2015 Mar; 509-510():16-27. PubMed ID: 25604938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Influence of Climate Change on Atmospheric Deposition of Mercury in the Arctic—A Model Sensitivity Study.
Hansen KM; Christensen JH; Brandt J
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2015 Sep; 12(9):11254-68. PubMed ID: 26378551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reduced mercury deposition in New Hampshire from 1996 to 2002 due to changes in local sources.
Han YJ; Holsen TM; Evers DC; Driscoll CT
Environ Pollut; 2008 Dec; 156(3):1348-56. PubMed ID: 18430499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Arctic atmospheric mercury: Sources and changes.
Dastoor A; Wilson SJ; Travnikov O; Ryjkov A; Angot H; Christensen JH; Steenhuisen F; Muntean M
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Sep; 839():156213. PubMed ID: 35623517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Investigation of mercury deposition and potential sources at six sites from the Pacific Coast to the Great Basin, USA.
Wright G; Gustin MS; Weiss-Penzias P; Miller MB
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Feb; 470-471():1099-113. PubMed ID: 24252197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Study of atmospheric mercury budget in East Asia using STEM-Hg modeling system.
Pan L; Lin CJ; Carmichael GR; Streets DG; Tang Y; Woo JH; Shetty SK; Chu HW; Ho TC; Friedli HR; Feng X
Sci Total Environ; 2010 Jul; 408(16):3277-91. PubMed ID: 20483447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Atmospheric mercury deposition and its contribution of the regional atmospheric transport to mercury pollution at a national forest nature reserve, southwest China.
Ma M; Wang D; Du H; Sun T; Zhao Z; Wei S
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 Dec; 22(24):20007-18. PubMed ID: 26298336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Source attribution for mercury deposition in the contiguous United States: regional difference and seasonal variation.
Lin CJ; Shetty SK; Pan L; Pongprueksa P; Jang C; Chu HW
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 Jan; 62(1):52-63. PubMed ID: 22393810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trends in mercury wet deposition and mercury air concentrations across the U.S. and Canada.
Weiss-Penzias PS; Gay DA; Brigham ME; Parsons MT; Gustin MS; Ter Schure A
Sci Total Environ; 2016 Oct; 568():546-556. PubMed ID: 26803218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Atmospherc mercury deposition during the last 270 years: a glacial ice core record of natural and anthropogenic sources.
Schuster PF; Krabbenhoft DP; Naftz DL; Cecil LD; Olson ML; Dewild JF; Susong DD; Green JR; Abbott ML
Environ Sci Technol; 2002 Jun; 36(11):2303-10. PubMed ID: 12075781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Trend analysis from 1970 to 2008 and model evaluation of EDGARv4 global gridded anthropogenic mercury emissions.
Muntean M; Janssens-Maenhout G; Song S; Selin NE; Olivier JG; Guizzardi D; Maas R; Dentener F
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Oct; 494-495():337-50. PubMed ID: 25068706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reconciling models and measurements to assess trends in atmospheric mercury deposition.
Sunderland EM; Cohen MD; Selin NE; Chmura GL
Environ Pollut; 2008 Nov; 156(2):526-35. PubMed ID: 18299164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mercury wet deposition and speciated mercury air concentrations at rural and urban sites across New York state: Temporal patterns, sources and scavenging coefficients.
Zhou H; Zhou C; Hopke PK; Holsen TM
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Oct; 637-638():943-953. PubMed ID: 29763876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Atmospheric mercury in the Canadian Arctic. Part I: a review of recent field measurements.
Steffen A; Lehnherr I; Cole A; Ariya P; Dastoor A; Durnford D; Kirk J; Pilote M
Sci Total Environ; 2015 Mar; 509-510():3-15. PubMed ID: 25497576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Responses of deposition and bioaccumulation in the Great Lakes region to policy and other large-scale drivers of mercury emissions.
Perlinger JA; Urban NR; Giang A; Selin NE; Hendricks AN; Zhang H; Kumar A; Wu S; Gagnon VS; Gorman HS; Norman ES
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2018 Jan; 20(1):195-209. PubMed ID: 29360116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mercury wet deposition in the eastern United States: characteristics and scavenging ratios.
Huang J; Chang FC; Wang S; Han YJ; Castro M; Miller E; Holsen TM
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2013 Dec; 15(12):2321-8. PubMed ID: 24190422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
