These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12667764)

  • 41. Assessment of modeled mercury dry deposition over the Great Lakes region.
    Zhang L; Blanchard P; Johnson D; Dastoor A; Ryzhkov A; Lin CJ; Vijayaraghavan K; Gay D; Holsen TM; Huang J; Graydon JA; St Louis VL; Castro MS; Miller EK; Marsik F; Lu J; Poissant L; Pilote M; Zhang KM
    Environ Pollut; 2012 Feb; 161():272-83. PubMed ID: 21705119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Impact of climate change on mercury concentrations and deposition in the eastern United States.
    Megaritis AG; Murphy BN; Racherla PN; Adams PJ; Pandis SN
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Jul; 487():299-312. PubMed ID: 24793327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Assessment of Global Mercury Deposition through Litterfall.
    Wang X; Bao Z; Lin CJ; Yuan W; Feng X
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Aug; 50(16):8548-57. PubMed ID: 27418119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Differential exposure of alpine ospreys to mercury: melting glaciers, hydrology or deposition patterns?
    Guigueno MF; Elliott KH; Levac J; Wayland M; Elliott JE
    Environ Int; 2012 Apr; 40():24-32. PubMed ID: 22280924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Atmospheric mercury deposition to forests in the eastern USA.
    Risch MR; DeWild JF; Gay DA; Zhang L; Boyer EW; Krabbenhoft DP
    Environ Pollut; 2017 Sep; 228():8-18. PubMed ID: 28501633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A review of studies on atmospheric mercury in China.
    Fu X; Feng X; Sommar J; Wang S
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Apr; 421-422():73-81. PubMed ID: 22134034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Modeling the atmospheric transport and deposition of mercury to the Great Lakes.
    Cohen M; Artz R; Draxler R; Miller P; Poissant L; Niemi D; Ratté D; Deslauriers M; Duval R; Laurin R; Slotnick J; Nettesheim T; McDonald J
    Environ Res; 2004 Jul; 95(3):247-65. PubMed ID: 15220060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A sensitivity analysis on the atmospheric transformation and deposition of mercury in north-eastern USA.
    Xu X; Yang X; Miller DR; Helble JJ; Thomas H; Carley RJ
    Sci Total Environ; 2000 Oct; 259(1-3):169-81. PubMed ID: 11032146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Some sources and sinks of monomethyl and inorganic mercury on Ellesmere Island in the Canadian High Arctic.
    St Louis VL; Sharp MJ; Steffen A; May A; Barker J; Kirk JL; Kelly DJ; Arnott SE; Keatley B; Smol JP
    Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Apr; 39(8):2686-701. PubMed ID: 15884366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. An assessment of anthropogenic source impacts on mercury cycling in the Willamette Basin, Oregon, USA.
    Hope BK
    Sci Total Environ; 2006 Mar; 356(1-3):165-91. PubMed ID: 15899511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Litterfall mercury dry deposition in the eastern USA.
    Risch MR; Dewild JF; Krabbenhoft DP; Kolka RK; Zhang L
    Environ Pollut; 2012 Feb; 161():284-90. PubMed ID: 21715069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Atmospheric transport of speciated mercury across southern Lake Michigan: Influence from emission sources in the Chicago/Gary urban area.
    Gratz LE; Keeler GJ; Marsik FJ; Barres JA; Dvonch JT
    Sci Total Environ; 2013 Mar; 448():84-95. PubMed ID: 23010282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Eddy covariance flux measurements of gaseous elemental mercury using cavity ring-down spectroscopy.
    Pierce AM; Moore CW; Wohlfahrt G; Hörtnagl L; Kljun N; Obrist D
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Feb; 49(3):1559-68. PubMed ID: 25608027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Mercury deposition and re-emission pathways in boreal forest soils investigated with Hg isotope signatures.
    Jiskra M; Wiederhold JG; Skyllberg U; Kronberg RM; Hajdas I; Kretzschmar R
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jun; 49(12):7188-96. PubMed ID: 25946594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Processes influencing rainfall deposition of mercury in Florida.
    Guentzel JL; Landing WM; Gill GA; Pollman CD
    Environ Sci Technol; 2001 Mar; 35(5):863-73. PubMed ID: 11351528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Modeling dynamic exchange of gaseous elemental mercury at polar sunrise.
    Dastoor AP; Davignon D; Theys N; Van Roozendael M; Steffen A; Ariya PA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Jul; 42(14):5183-8. PubMed ID: 18754367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Global source-receptor relationships for mercury deposition under present-day and 2050 emissions scenarios.
    Corbitt ES; Jacob DJ; Holmes CD; Streets DG; Sunderland EM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Dec; 45(24):10477-84. PubMed ID: 22050654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. 500 years of mercury production: global annual inventory by region until 2000 and associated emissions.
    Hylander LD; Meili M
    Sci Total Environ; 2003 Mar; 304(1-3):13-27. PubMed ID: 12663168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. An inventory of historical mercury emissions in maritime canada: implications for present and future contamination.
    Sunderlan EM; Chmura GL
    Sci Total Environ; 2000 Jun; 256(1):39-57. PubMed ID: 10898386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Increased atmospheric deposition of mercury in reference lakes near major urban areas.
    Van Metre PC
    Environ Pollut; 2012 Mar; 162():209-15. PubMed ID: 22243866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.