These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12668693)

  • 21. A simulation-based evaluation of a graphic cardiovascular display.
    Albert RW; Agutter JA; Syroid ND; Johnson KB; Loeb RG; Westenskow DR
    Anesth Analg; 2007 Nov; 105(5):1303-11, table of contents. PubMed ID: 17959959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Using personas and prototypes to define nurses' requirements for a novel patient monitoring display.
    Koch S; Sheeren A; Staggers N
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 146():69-73. PubMed ID: 19592811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An interactive graphical system for automated mapping and display of cardiac rhythms.
    He YH; Ghanem RN; Waldo AL; Rudy Y
    J Electrocardiol; 1999 Jul; 32(3):225-41. PubMed ID: 10465566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Tests for independence between marks and points of a marked point process.
    Guan Y
    Biometrics; 2006 Mar; 62(1):126-34. PubMed ID: 16542238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effective graphical displays.
    Menon A; Nerella N
    Pharm Dev Technol; 2001 Aug; 6(3):477-84. PubMed ID: 11485189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The complex role of perceptual organization in visual display design theory.
    Sanderson PM; Haskell I; Flach JM
    Ergonomics; 1992 Oct; 35(10):1199-219. PubMed ID: 1516576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluating the accuracy of size perception on screen-based displays: Displayed objects appear smaller than real objects.
    Stefanucci JK; Creem-Regehr SH; Thompson WB; Lessard DA; Geuss MN
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2015 Sep; 21(3):215-23. PubMed ID: 26121374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Visualization concepts to enhance quantitative decision making in drug development.
    Dykstra K; Pugh R; Krause A
    J Clin Pharmacol; 2010 Sep; 50(9 Suppl):130S-139S. PubMed ID: 20881226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Alphanumeric and graphic displays for dynamic process monitoring and control.
    Coury BG; Pietras CM
    Ergonomics; 1989 Nov; 32(11):1373-1389. PubMed ID: 28080931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Advanced auditory displays and head-mounted displays: advantages and disadvantages for monitoring by the distracted anesthesiologist.
    Sanderson PM; Watson MO; Russell WJ; Jenkins S; Liu D; Green N; Llewelyn K; Cole P; Shek V; Krupenia SS
    Anesth Analg; 2008 Jun; 106(6):1787-97. PubMed ID: 18499611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy of tidal volume, compliance, and resistance measurements on neonatal ventilator displays: an in vitro assessment.
    Abbasi S; Sivieri E; Roberts R; Kirpalani H
    Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2012 Jul; 13(4):e262-8. PubMed ID: 22596072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Graphics in scientific communication and reasoning: tools or ornaments?].
    González Alastrué JA; Jover L
    Med Clin (Barc); 2004; 122 Suppl 1():3-10. PubMed ID: 14980153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Polychromatic plots: graphical display of multidimensional data.
    Roederer M; Moody MA
    Cytometry A; 2008 Sep; 73(9):868-74. PubMed ID: 18629844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [A head-mounted display system for augmented reality: initial evaluation for interventional MRI].
    Wendt M; Sauer F; Khamene A; Bascle B; Vogt S; Wacker FK
    Rofo; 2003 Mar; 175(3):418-21. PubMed ID: 12635021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Radar plots: a useful way for presenting multivariate health care data.
    Saary MJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 61(4):311-7. PubMed ID: 18313553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Quantifying visual similarity in clinical iconic graphics.
    Payne PR; Starren JB
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2005; 12(3):338-45. PubMed ID: 15684136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Under the weather: an evaluation of different modes of presenting meteorological information for pilots.
    O'Hare D; Stenhouse N
    Appl Ergon; 2009 Jul; 40(4):688-93. PubMed ID: 18701088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Biochemical modeling with Systems Biology Graphical Notation.
    Jansson A; Jirstrand M
    Drug Discov Today; 2010 May; 15(9-10):365-70. PubMed ID: 20211756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of Numerical Versus Foreground-Only Icon Displays on Understanding of Risk Magnitudes.
    Stone ER; Gabard AR; Groves AE; Lipkus IM
    J Health Commun; 2015; 20(10):1230-41. PubMed ID: 26065633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of techniques for the presentation of laboratory data. II: Accuracy of interpretation.
    Verheij R; Hoeke JO; Bonke B; van Strik R; Gelsema ES
    Methods Inf Med; 1997 Jan; 36(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 9121370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.