BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12668747)

  • 1. Detection of monitoring materials on bedside chest radiographs with the most recent generation of storage phosphor plates: dose increase does not improve detection performance.
    Eisenhuber E; Stadler A; Prokop M; Fuchsjager M; Weber M; Schaefer-Prokop C
    Radiology; 2003 Apr; 227(1):216-21. PubMed ID: 12668747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of subtle undisplaced rib fractures in a porcine model: radiation dose requirement--digital flat-panel versus screen-film and storage-phosphor systems.
    Ludwig K; Schülke C; Diederich S; Wormanns D; Lenzen H; Bernhardt TM; Brinckmann P; Heindel W
    Radiology; 2003 Apr; 227(1):163-8. PubMed ID: 12615999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selenium radiography versus storage phosphor and conventional radiography in the detection of simulated chest lesions.
    Schaefer-Prokop CM; Prokop M; Schmidt A; Neitzel U; Galanski M
    Radiology; 1996 Oct; 201(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 8816519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improved control of image optical density with low-dose digital and conventional radiography in bedside imaging.
    Schaefer CM; Greene RE; Oestmann JW; Kamalsky JM; Hall DA; Llewellyn HJ; Robertson CL; Rhea JT; Rosenthal H; Rubens JR
    Radiology; 1989 Dec; 173(3):713-6. PubMed ID: 2813775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ROC-analysis of detection performance by analogue and digital plain film systems in chest radiography.
    Müller RD; Wähling S; Hirche H; Voss M; Blendl C; Gocke C; Gocke P; Buddenbrock B; John V; Wiebringhaus R; Turowski B
    Acta Radiol; 1996 Nov; 37(6):847-54. PubMed ID: 8995453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The visibility of a central venous catheter using digital luminescence radiography in intensive care radiology].
    Galanski M; Prokop M; Thorns E; Oestmann JW; Reichelt S; Haubitz B; Milbradt H; Gräser A; Verner L; Schaefer C
    Rofo; 1992 Jan; 156(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 1733477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of ambient light and window settings on the detectability of catheters on soft-copy display of chest radiographs at bedside.
    Fuchsjäger MH; Schaefer-Prokop CM; Eisenhuber E; Homolka P; Weber M; Funovics MA; Prokop M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Nov; 181(5):1415-21. PubMed ID: 14573447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Initial clinical results with a new needle screen storage phosphor system in chest radiograms.
    Körner M; Wirth S; Treitl M; Reiser M; Pfeifer KJ
    Rofo; 2005 Nov; 177(11):1491-6. PubMed ID: 16302129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection of simulated chest lesions: comparison of a conventional screen-film combination, an asymmetric screen-film system, and storage phosphor radiography.
    Leppert AG; Prokop M; Schaefer-Prokop CM; Galanski M
    Radiology; 1995 Apr; 195(1):259-63. PubMed ID: 7892482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Portable chest imaging: comparison of storage phosphor digital, asymmetric screen-film, and conventional screen-film systems.
    Niklason LT; Chan HP; Cascade PN; Chang CL; Chee PW; Mathews JF
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 8421740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Digital chest x-rays with a selenium detector: a prospective comparison with a conventional film-screen combination].
    Freund M; Reuter M; Palmié S; Harder E; Hutzelmann A; Heller M
    Rofo; 1997 Feb; 166(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 9116250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Digital radiography: from storage phosphor plates to direct detector systems].
    Schaefer-Prokop C; Uffmann M; Stadler A
    Wien Med Wochenschr Suppl; 2002; (113):30-4. PubMed ID: 12621834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lumbar spine radiography: digital flat-panel detector versus screen-film and storage-phosphor systems in monkeys as a pediatric model.
    Ludwig K; Ahlers K; Wormanns D; Freund M; Bernhardt TM; Diederich S; Heindel W
    Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 12925714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing image quality of flat-panel chest radiography with storage phosphor radiography and film-screen radiography.
    Ganten M; Radeleff B; Kampschulte A; Daniels MD; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jul; 181(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 12818852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Chest radiography: ROC phantom study of four different digital systems and one conventional radiographic system].
    Redlich U; Reissberg S; Hoeschen C; Effenberger O; Fessel A; Preuss H; Scherlach C; Döhring W
    Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 12525979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mottle on computed radiographs of the chest in pediatric patients.
    Huda W; Slone RM; Belden CJ; Williams JL; Cumming WA; Palmer CK
    Radiology; 1996 Apr; 199(1):249-52. PubMed ID: 8633153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance of a flat-panel detector in detecting artificial bone lesions: comparison with conventional screen-film and storage-phosphor radiography.
    Ludwig K; Lenzen H; Kamm KF; Link TM; Diederich S; Wormanns D; Heindel W
    Radiology; 2002 Feb; 222(2):453-9. PubMed ID: 11818613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Chest radiography with a digital flat-panel detector: experimental receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Metz S; Damoser P; Hollweck R; Roggel R; Engelke C; Woertler K; Renger B; Rummeny EJ; Link TM
    Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):776-84. PubMed ID: 15734933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of a flat-panel detector in the detection of artificial erosive changes: comparison with conventional screen-film and storage-phosphor radiography.
    Ludwig K; Henschel A; Bernhardt TM; Lenzen H; Wormanns D; Diederich S; Heindel W
    Eur Radiol; 2003 Jun; 13(6):1316-23. PubMed ID: 12764648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.