These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12668747)

  • 21. [Thoracic radiographs with the AMBER system. A comparison of the diagnostic image quality of film-screen and storage-phosphor radiographs on the grid-partition stand and the AMBER system].
    Busch HP; Hartmann J; Freund MC; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M; Richter K
    Rofo; 1992 Mar; 156(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 1550921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
    Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Visibility of normal thoracic anatomic landmarks on storage phosphor digital radiography versus conventional radiography.
    Konen E; Greenberg I; Rozenman J
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2005 Aug; 7(8):495-7. PubMed ID: 16106773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [New imaging methods in thoracic diagnosis. A study to evaluate digital storage screen radiography, the slit technique ("AMBER"), asymmetric ("InSight") and conventional film-screen techniques].
    Lehmann KJ; Busch HP; Drescher P; Loose R; Georgi M
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 8448224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
    MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
    Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Image quality for five modern chest radiography techniques: a modified FROC study with an anthropomorphic chest phantom.
    Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Lanhede B; Tylén U
    Eur Radiol; 1999; 9(9):1826-34. PubMed ID: 10602958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Storage phosphor direct magnification mammography in comparison with conventional screen-film mammography--a phantom study.
    Funke M; Breiter N; Hermann KP; Oestmann JW; Grabbe E
    Br J Radiol; 1998 May; 71(845):528-34. PubMed ID: 9691898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accuracy of bedside chest hard-copy screen-film versus hard- and soft-copy computed radiographs in a medical intensive care unit: receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Kundel HL; Gefter W; Aronchick J; Miller W; Hatabu H; Whitfill CH; Miller W
    Radiology; 1997 Dec; 205(3):859-63. PubMed ID: 9393548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Digital imaging with a photostimulable phosphor in the chest of newborns.
    Cohen MD; Katz BP; Kalasinski LA; White SJ; Smith JA; Long B
    Radiology; 1991 Dec; 181(3):829-32. PubMed ID: 1947105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Digital thoracic radiography--a comparison of digital and analog imaging techniques].
    Busch HP
    Bildgebung; 1991; 58 Suppl 1():9-12. PubMed ID: 1799858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Chest radiographic image quality: comparison of asymmetric screen-film, digital storage phosphor, and digital selenium drum systems--preliminary study.
    Beute GH; Flynn MJ; Eyler WR; Samei E; Spizarny DL; Zylak CJ
    Radiographics; 1998; 18(3):745-54. PubMed ID: 9599395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quality of digital pre-implant tomography: comparison of film-screen images with storage phosphor images at normal and low dose.
    Ekestubbe A; Gröndahl HG; Molander B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Sep; 32(5):322-6. PubMed ID: 14709608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Full-size digital storage phosphor chest radiography: effect of 4K versus 2K matrix size on observer performance in detection of subtle interstitial abnormalities.
    Ueguchi T; Johkoh T; Tomiyama N; Honda O; Mihara N; Hamada S; Murai S; Ogata Y; Matsumoto M; Nakamura H
    Radiat Med; 2005 May; 23(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 15940063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Storage phosphor radiographs vs conventional films: interpreters' perceptions of diagnostic quality.
    Fuhrman CR; Gur D; Good B; Rockette H; Cooperstein LA; Feist JH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 May; 150(5):1011-4. PubMed ID: 3258701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of doses for bedside examinations of the chest with conventional screen-film and computed radiography: results of a randomized controlled trial.
    Weatherburn GC; Bryan S; Davies JG
    Radiology; 2000 Dec; 217(3):707-12. PubMed ID: 11110932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Chest image quality: film-screen vs. computed radiography.
    Freedman M
    Adm Radiol; 1991 Jul; 10(7):38-40, 42. PubMed ID: 10170769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. High frequency edge enhancement in the detection of fine pulmonary lines. Parity between storage phosphor digital images and conventional chest radiography.
    Oestmann JW; Greene R; Rubens JR; Pile-Spellman E; Hall D; Robertson C; Llewellyn HJ; McCarthy KA; Potsaid M; White G
    Invest Radiol; 1989 Sep; 24(9):643-6. PubMed ID: 2807816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Interpretation of subtle interstitial chest abnormalities: conventional radiography versus high-resolution storage-phosphor radiography--a preliminary study.
    Ikezoe J; Kohno N; Kido S; Takeuchi N; Johkoh T; Arisawa J; Kozuka T
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):31-6. PubMed ID: 7734537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Detectability of catheters on bedside chest radiographs: comparison between liquid crystal display and high-resolution cathode-ray tube monitors.
    Scharitzer M; Prokop M; Weber M; Fuchsjäger M; Oschatz E; Schaefer-Prokop C
    Radiology; 2005 Feb; 234(2):611-6. PubMed ID: 15601893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Experimental evaluation of a portable indirect flat-panel detector for the pediatric chest: comparison with storage phosphor radiography at different exposures by using a chest phantom.
    Rapp-Bernhardt U; Bernhardt TM; Lenzen H; Esseling R; Roehl FW; Schiborr M; Theobald-Hormann I; Heindel W
    Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):485-91. PubMed ID: 16170012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.