These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12668953)

  • 1. [Image display devices (4) - the standard of display quality].
    Hashimoto N
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Feb; 59(2):255-62. PubMed ID: 12668953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of a simple Leeds test object for rapid assessment of image intensifiers.
    Grant AM; Kehoe TM; Law J
    Br J Radiol; 1987 Oct; 60(718):1019-21. PubMed ID: 3676644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Analysis of frequency-contrast characteristics of digital X-ray image detectors].
    Zelikman MI; Kabanov SP; Kokuev AN; Kruchinin SA; Lobov DP
    Med Tekh; 2006; (5):23-7. PubMed ID: 17133940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [How much value can be attributed to medical documentation? Radiographic examination of a shoulder].
    Larsen E; Asmussen I
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2001 Aug; 163(33):4414. PubMed ID: 11521583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A figure of merit for the assessment of image intensifier systems.
    McRobbie DW; Hancock AP; Castellano IA
    Br J Radiol; 1992 Oct; 65(778):878-84. PubMed ID: 1422661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [X-ray intensifying screens: their effect on the quality of the image and the degree of irradiation].
    Tombak MI; Vlasov PV; Gurvich AM; Gurevich IA; Katomina RV
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1984; (5):80-4. PubMed ID: 6528468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimisation of dose per image in digital imaging.
    Marshall NW
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):83-7. PubMed ID: 11487849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative performance of x-ray-intensifying screens.
    Burgess AE; Hicken P
    Radiology; 1982 May; 143(2):551-6. PubMed ID: 7071362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Image enhancer-television equipment--image quality and dose].
    Larwin K
    Strahlenschutz Forsch Prax; 1986; 27():43-7. PubMed ID: 3705125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Measurement of objective parameters of image quality of film-screen combinations].
    Angerstein W; Wolf M
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1986; 27(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 3961142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The assessment of dose and image quality of storage phosphor systems: an overview of the different tasks.
    Bosmans H; Carton AK; Pauwels H; Deprez T; Marchal G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):77-81. PubMed ID: 11487848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality assurance tests for digital radiography in general dental practice.
    Greenall C; Drage N; Ager M
    Dent Update; 2014 Mar; 41(2):126-8, 131-4. PubMed ID: 24783881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Basic parameters and testing methods for medical roentgen screens].
    Gurvich AM; Il'ina MA; Katomina RV
    Med Tekh; 1987; (6):38-44. PubMed ID: 3326993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Response of x-ray intensifying screens to scattered and primary radiation.
    Koedooder K; Venema HW
    Phys Med Biol; 1984 Oct; 29(10):1237-48. PubMed ID: 6494250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of image blur (unsharpness) in medical imaging.
    Haus AG
    Med Radiogr Photogr; 1985 Jun; 61(1-2):42-53. PubMed ID: 3900624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of the current use of rare-earth screens in the United Kingdom.
    Russell JG
    Br J Radiol; 1986 Jun; 59(702):630. PubMed ID: 3708274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of a line-pair resolution phantom for comprehensive quality assurance of electronic portal imaging devices based on fundamental imaging metrics.
    Gopal A; Samant SS
    Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 36(6):2006-15. PubMed ID: 19610289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of radiographic image quality parameters obtained with the REX simulator.
    Magalhaes LA; Drexler GG; deAlmeida CE
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(4):614-8. PubMed ID: 21273198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selecting the best screen-film combination.
    Stears JG; Gray JE; Frank ED
    Radiol Technol; 1987; 58(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 3823415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Threshold contrast detail detectability curves for fluoroscopy and digital acquisition using modern image intensifier systems.
    Evans DS; Mackenzie A; Lawinski CP; Smith D
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Sep; 77(921):751-8. PubMed ID: 15447961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.