264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12669227)
1. Noninvasive angiographic evaluation of coronary stents with multi-slice spiral computed tomography.
Nieman K; Cademartiri F; Raaijmakers R; Pattynama P; de Feyter P
Herz; 2003 Mar; 28(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 12669227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Feasibility of assessment of coronary stent patency using 16-slice computed tomography.
Schuijf JD; Bax JJ; Jukema JW; Lamb HJ; Warda HM; Vliegen HW; de Roos A; van der Wall EE
Am J Cardiol; 2004 Aug; 94(4):427-30. PubMed ID: 15325923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Noninvasive assessment of coronary stents in patients by 16-slice computed tomography.
Kitagawa T; Fujii T; Tomohiro Y; Maeda K; Kobayashi M; Kunita E; Sekiguchi Y
Int J Cardiol; 2006 May; 109(2):188-94. PubMed ID: 16019087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery stents patency after PTCA: role of Multislice Computed Tomography.
Ligabue G; Rossi R; Ratti C; Favali M; Modena MG; Romagnoli R
Radiol Med; 2004; 108(1-2):128-37. PubMed ID: 15269696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Assessment of coronary stent lumen visibility and patency by 64-slice spiral CT angiography].
Kong LY; Jin ZY; Wang YN; Song L; Zhang ZH; Zhang LR; Zhang SY; Lin SB; Wang Y; Zhao WM
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2006 Feb; 28(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 16548184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Coronary artery visualization using a 64-row multi-slice computed tomography in unselected patients with definite or suspected coronary artery disease: a comparison with invasive coronary angiography.
Sosnowski M; Pysz P; Gola A; Szymański L; Tendera M
Cardiol J; 2009; 16(5):413-7. PubMed ID: 19753519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between four-slice computed tomography and coronary angiography for the assessment of coronary stents.
Mazzarotto P; Di Renzi P; Paluello GM; Carunchio A; Ricci R; Molisso A; Ceci V; Indolfi C
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2006 May; 7(5):328-34. PubMed ID: 16645410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Coronary stent assessability by 64 slice multi-detector computed tomography.
Sheth T; Dodd JD; Hoffmann U; Abbara S; Finn A; Gold HK; Brady TJ; Cury RC
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2007 Jun; 69(7):933-8. PubMed ID: 17421013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Usefulness of measuring coronary lumen density with multi-slice computed tomography to detect in-stent restenosis.
Kitagawa T; Yamamoto H; Horiguchi J; Hirai N; Fujii T; Ito K; Kohno N
Int J Cardiol; 2008 Feb; 124(2):239-43. PubMed ID: 17360050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Coronary artery stents in multislice computed tomography: in vitro artifact evaluation.
Mahnken AH; Buecker A; Wildberger JE; Ruebben A; Stanzel S; Vogt F; Günther RW; Blindt R
Invest Radiol; 2004 Jan; 39(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 14701986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of dual source versus 256-slice multi-slice CT in the evaluation of 16 coronary artery stents.
André F; Korosoglou G; Hosch W; Giannitsis E; Kauczor HU; Katus HA; Steen H
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Apr; 82(4):601-7. PubMed ID: 23280306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of coronary artery in-stent patency using 64-slice computed tomography.
Zhao J; Zheng LL; Yang Y
Coron Artery Dis; 2011 Dec; 22(8):540-52. PubMed ID: 21959714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Usefulness of 64-slice multislice computed tomography coronary angiography to assess in-stent restenosis.
Cademartiri F; Schuijf JD; Pugliese F; Mollet NR; Jukema JW; Maffei E; Kroft LJ; Palumbo A; Ardissino D; Serruys PW; Krestin GP; Van der Wall EE; de Feyter PJ; Bax JJ
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 Jun; 49(22):2204-10. PubMed ID: 17543641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Clinical application of 64-slice CT angiography in the evaluation of lumen before and after coronary artery stent implantation].
Ma E; Yang Z; Feng Y; Zhang L; He Y; Guo Y; Qian L
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Dec; 25(6):1311-4, 1318. PubMed ID: 19166199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multislice spiral computed tomography for the evaluation of stent patency after left main coronary artery stenting: a comparison with conventional coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound.
Van Mieghem CA; Cademartiri F; Mollet NR; Malagutti P; Valgimigli M; Meijboom WB; Pugliese F; McFadden EP; Ligthart J; Runza G; Bruining N; Smits PC; Regar E; van der Giessen WJ; Sianos G; van Domburg R; de Jaegere P; Krestin GP; Serruys PW; de Feyter PJ
Circulation; 2006 Aug; 114(7):645-53. PubMed ID: 16894038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Additional value of dipyridamole stress myocardial perfusion by 64-row computed tomography in patients with coronary stents.
Magalhães TA; Cury RC; Pereira AC; Moreira Vde M; Lemos PA; Kalil-Filho R; Rochitte CE
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2011; 5(6):449-58. PubMed ID: 22146504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Invasive versus noninvasive (MSCT) coronary angiography. Importance of cardiac diagnostics with multislice computed tomography].
Böhme E; Steinbigler P; Czernik A; Luber A; Scherzberg-Doktorczyk A; Buck J; Haberl R
Herz; 2003 Feb; 28(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 12616319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Coronary artery stent evaluation using a vascular model at 64-detector row CT: comparison between prospective and retrospective ECG-gated axial scans.
Suzuki S; Furui S; Kuwahara S; Mehta D; Kaminaga T; Miyazawa A; Ueno Y; Konno K
Korean J Radiol; 2009; 10(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 19412509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Assessment of coronary artery stents in computed tomography: state of the art].
Krupiński M; Miszalski-Jamka T; Klimeczek P; Banyś RP; Irzyk M; Laskowicz B; Pasowicz M
Przegl Lek; 2010; 67(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 20557013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spectral Photon-Counting Computed Tomography for Coronary Stent Imaging: Evaluation of the Potential Clinical Impact for the Delineation of In-Stent Restenosis.
Bratke G; Hickethier T; Bar-Ness D; Bunck AC; Maintz D; Pahn G; Coulon P; Si-Mohamed S; Douek P; Sigovan M
Invest Radiol; 2020 Feb; 55(2):61-67. PubMed ID: 31524765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
