These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12669324)

  • 1. Pegram v. Herdrich. 530 U.S. 211 (2000).
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():159-60. PubMed ID: 12669324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pegram v. Herdrich: The Supreme Court confronts managed care.
    Jost TS
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():187-93. PubMed ID: 12669328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pegram v. Herdrich: a victory for HMOs or the beginning of the end for ERISA preemption?
    Borzi PC
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():161-9. PubMed ID: 12669325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A perspective from within the white coat.
    Chow RD
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():171-5. PubMed ID: 12669326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pegram's significance for managed health care.
    Saccoccio L
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():195-201. PubMed ID: 12669329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dividing loyalties: caring for individuals and populations.
    Jecker NS
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():177-86. PubMed ID: 12669327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mismanaged care: the challenges facing judicial interpretation of contemporary health policy.
    Schlesinger M
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():203-13. PubMed ID: 12669330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pegram v. Herdrich: On peritonitis, preemption, and the elusive goal of managed care accountability.
    Hammer PJ
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2001 Aug; 26(4):767-87. PubMed ID: 11523963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pegram v. Herdrich: HMOs aren't perfect, but ..
    Wahl JR
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 2001; 27(2):297-305. PubMed ID: 12778921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Supreme Court refuses to "precipitate the upheaval" in Pegram v. Herdrich.
    Torrance AB
    Health Care Law Mon; 2000 Jul; ():16-8. PubMed ID: 11066640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Law & psychiatry: Pegram v. Herdrich: the Supreme Court passes the buck on managed care.
    Appelbaum PS
    Psychiatr Serv; 2000 Oct; 51(10):1225-6, 1238. PubMed ID: 11013317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. To preempt or not to preempt: HMO liability pre and post Pegram v. Herdrich.
    Glassman AD
    J Law Health; 2003-2004; 18(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16521889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Employer sponsored health benefit plans under ERISA after Pegram v. Herdrich: the fiduciary duty argument and mixed eligibility versus treatment decisions.
    Karns JE
    J Law Health; 2000-2001; 15(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11930500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fiduciaries--HMOs--incentives to ration care. Pegram v. Herdrich.
    Benefits Q; 2001; 17(2):61-3. PubMed ID: 11372475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. U.S. health care after Pegram: betrayal at the bedside?
    Bloche MG
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2000; 19(5):224-7. PubMed ID: 10992672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. HMO malpractice: have the floodgates opened?
    Hansen E
    Manag Care Interface; 2000 Sep; 13(9):84-6. PubMed ID: 11142969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pegram v. Herdrich. A recent U.S. Supreme Court decision threatens patients and physicians.
    Geist RW
    Minn Med; 2002 Jul; 85(7):6, 58-9. PubMed ID: 12152532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Litigating around ERISA to quality managed healthcare: an HMO can breach fiduciary duties.
    Karns JE
    Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 2001 Mar; (263):9-30. PubMed ID: 11291401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pegram's regress: a missed chance for sensible judicial review of managed care decisions.
    Cahill MT; Jacobson PD
    Am J Law Med; 2001; 27(4):421-38. PubMed ID: 11837143
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of the recent Supreme Court rulings in Pegram and Rush Prudential on state regulation of managed care organizations.
    Trueman DL
    J Health Law; 2003; 36(1):107-32. PubMed ID: 12784923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.