These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12669744)

  • 1. A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance.
    Tombu M; Jolicoeur P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Feb; 29(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 12669744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. All-or-none bottleneck versus capacity sharing accounts of the psychological refractory period phenomenon.
    Tombu M; Jolicoeur P
    Psychol Res; 2002 Nov; 66(4):274-86. PubMed ID: 12466925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Testing the predictions of the central capacity sharing model.
    Tombu M; Jolicoeur P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Aug; 31(4):790-802. PubMed ID: 16131250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When underadditivity of factor effects in the Psychological Refractory Period paradigm implies a bottleneck: evidence from psycholinguistics.
    Besner D; Reynolds M; O'Malley S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Nov; 62(11):2222-34. PubMed ID: 19370482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the importance of Task 1 and error performance measures in PRP dual-task studies.
    Strobach T; Schütz A; Schubert T
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():403. PubMed ID: 25904890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dual-task interference with equal task emphasis: graded capacity sharing or central postponement?
    Ruthruff E; Pashler HE; Hazeltine E
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Jul; 65(5):801-16. PubMed ID: 12956587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence for a response preparation bottleneck during dual-task performance: effect of a startling acoustic stimulus on the psychological refractory period.
    Maslovat D; Chua R; Spencer HC; Forgaard CJ; Carlsen AN; Franks IM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Nov; 144(3):481-7. PubMed ID: 24076331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dual-task processing when task 1 is hard and task 2 is easy: reversed central processing order?
    Leonhard T; Fernández SR; Ulrich R; Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):115-36. PubMed ID: 20718575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stress improves task processing efficiency in dual-tasks.
    Beste C; Yildiz A; Meissner TW; Wolf OT
    Behav Brain Res; 2013 Sep; 252():260-5. PubMed ID: 23769959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence of resource sharing in the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm.
    Mittelstädt V; Mackenzie IG; Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Nov; 48(11):1279-1293. PubMed ID: 36107664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Viewer perspective affects central bottleneck requirements in spatial translation tasks.
    Franz EA; Sebastian A; Hust C; Norris T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):398-412. PubMed ID: 18377178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attentional limits in memory retrieval.
    Carrier LM; Pashler H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Sep; 21(5):1339-48. PubMed ID: 8744967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Central interference in driving: is there any stopping the psychological refractory period?
    Levy J; Pashler H; Boer E
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Mar; 17(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 16507063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigation of reward effects in overlapping dual-task situations.
    Langsdorf LE; Kübler S; Schubert T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2022 Feb; 222():103465. PubMed ID: 34922040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Locus of semantic interference in picture naming: Evidence from dual-task performance.
    Piai V; Roelofs A; Schriefers H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):147-65. PubMed ID: 23895445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dual-task performance with ideomotor-compatible tasks: is the central processing bottleneck intact, bypassed, or shifted in locus?
    Lien MC; McCann RS; Ruthruff E; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Feb; 31(1):122-44. PubMed ID: 15709868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of task order predictability in audio-visual dual task performance: Just a central capacity limitation?
    Töllner T; Strobach T; Schubert T; Müller HJ
    Front Integr Neurosci; 2012; 6():75. PubMed ID: 22973208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Response grouping in the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm: models and contamination effects.
    Ulrich R; Miller J
    Cogn Psychol; 2008 Sep; 57(2):75-121. PubMed ID: 18262510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can practice eliminate the psychological refractory period effect?
    Van Selst M; Ruthruff E; Johnston JC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Oct; 25(5):1268-83. PubMed ID: 10531663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two sources of task prioritization: The interplay of effector-based and task order-based capacity allocation in the PRP paradigm.
    Hoffmann MA; Pieczykolan A; Koch I; Huestegge L
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Oct; 82(7):3402-3414. PubMed ID: 32533527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.