These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12669747)

  • 1. Top-down control over biased competition during covert spatial orienting.
    Awh E; Matsukura M; Serences JT
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Feb; 29(1):52-63. PubMed ID: 12669747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Resolving visual interference during covert spatial orienting: online attentional control through static records of prior visual experience.
    Awh E; Sgarlata AM; Kliestik J
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 May; 134(2):192-206. PubMed ID: 15869345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Object-based biased competition during covert spatial orienting.
    Scolari M; Awh E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1366-1385. PubMed ID: 30684205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Expectancies modulate attentional capture by salient color singletons.
    Geyer T; Müller HJ; Krummenacher J
    Vision Res; 2008 May; 48(11):1315-26. PubMed ID: 18407311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatial working memory load impairs signal enhancement, but not attentional orienting.
    Han SW; Kim MS
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Jul; 70(5):916-23. PubMed ID: 18613637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of temporal selection on spatial selection and distractor interference: an attentional blink study.
    Jiang Y; Chun MM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Jun; 27(3):664-79. PubMed ID: 11424653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stimulus discrimination following covert attentional orienting to an exogenous cue.
    Henderson JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Feb; 17(1):91-106. PubMed ID: 1826325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can new objects override attentional control settings?
    Folk CL; Remington R
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 May; 61(4):727-39. PubMed ID: 10370339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Top-down and bottom-up attentional control: on the nature of interference from a salient distractor.
    Kim MS; Cave KR
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Aug; 61(6):1009-23. PubMed ID: 10497423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Role of Top-Down Focused Spatial Attention in Preattentive Salience Coding and Salience-based Attentional Capture.
    Bertleff S; Fink GR; Weidner R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 28(8):1152-65. PubMed ID: 27054402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial uncertainty explains exogenous and endogenous attentional cuing effects in visual signal detection.
    Gould IC; Wolfgang BJ; Smith PL
    J Vis; 2007 Oct; 7(13):4.1-17. PubMed ID: 17997632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Audiovisual links in exogenous covert spatial orienting.
    Spence C; Driver J
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Jan; 59(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 9038403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preparatory activity in visual cortex indexes distractor suppression during covert spatial orienting.
    Serences JT; Yantis S; Culberson A; Awh E
    J Neurophysiol; 2004 Dec; 92(6):3538-45. PubMed ID: 15254075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attentional mechanisms in simple visual detection: a speed-accuracy trade-off analysis.
    Liu CC; Wolfgang BJ; Smith PL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1329-45. PubMed ID: 19803640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The time course of attention: selection is transient.
    Wilschut A; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(11):e27661. PubMed ID: 22125619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contingent attentional capture or delayed allocation of attention?
    Remington RW; Folk CL; McLean JP
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Feb; 63(2):298-307. PubMed ID: 11281104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mask-dependent attentional cuing effects in visual signal detection: the psychometric function for contrast.
    Smith PL; Wolfgang BJ; Sinclair AJ
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Aug; 66(6):1056-75. PubMed ID: 15675651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial attention in early vision.
    Theeuwes J; Kramer AF; Atchley P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2001 Jun; 108(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 11485190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Specific impairment of visual spatial covert attention mechanisms in Parkinson's disease.
    Sampaio J; Bobrowicz-Campos E; André R; Almeida I; Faria P; Januário C; Freire A; Castelo-Branco M
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jan; 49(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 21075128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Region-based shielding of visual search from salient distractors: Target detection is impaired with same- but not different-dimension distractors.
    Sauter M; Liesefeld HR; Zehetleitner M; Müller HJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):622-642. PubMed ID: 29299850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.