These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12669748)

  • 1. Bimanual interference associated with the selection of target locations.
    Diedrichsen J; Ivry RB; Hazeltine E; Kennerley S; Cohen A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Feb; 29(1):64-77. PubMed ID: 12669748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Moving to directly cued locations abolishes spatial interference during bimanual actions.
    Diedrichsen J; Hazeltine E; Kennerley S; Ivry RB
    Psychol Sci; 2001 Nov; 12(6):493-8. PubMed ID: 11760137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Facilitation and interference during the preparation of bimanual movements: contributions from starting locations, movement amplitudes, and target locations.
    Blinch J; Cameron BD; Franks IM; Carpenter MG; Chua R
    Psychol Res; 2015 Nov; 79(6):978-88. PubMed ID: 25388127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bimanual interference associated with handling different tool transformations.
    Massen C; Sattler C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Jun; 39(3):893-909. PubMed ID: 23148470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bimanual interference in rapid discrete movements is task specific and occurs at multiple levels of processing.
    Obhi SS; Goodale MA
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Sep; 94(3):1861-8. PubMed ID: 15917318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Target selection during bimanual reaching to direct cues is unaffected by the perceptual similarity of the targets.
    Albert NB; Weigelt M; Hazeltine E; Ivry RB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Oct; 33(5):1107-16. PubMed ID: 17924810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual attention during the preparation of bimanual movements.
    Baldauf D; Deubel H
    Vision Res; 2008 Feb; 48(4):549-63. PubMed ID: 18206205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Re-examining structural constraints on the initiation of bimanual movements: the role of starting locations, movement amplitudes, and target locations.
    Weigelt M
    Hum Mov Sci; 2007 Apr; 26(2):212-25. PubMed ID: 17343946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bimanual reaches with symbolic cues exhibit errors in target selection.
    Blinch J; Cameron BD; Franks IM; Chua R
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Aug; 212(4):541-54. PubMed ID: 21687986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Unified nature of bimanual movements revealed by separating the preparation of each arm.
    Blinch J; Franks IM; Carpenter MG; Chua R
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Jun; 233(6):1931-44. PubMed ID: 25850406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing movement preparation of unimanual, bimanual symmetric, and bimanual asymmetric movements.
    Blinch J; Cameron BD; Cressman EK; Franks IM; Carpenter MG; Chua R
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Mar; 232(3):947-55. PubMed ID: 24381087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Independent on-line control of the two hands during bimanual reaching.
    Diedrichsen J; Nambisan R; Kennerley SW; Ivry RB
    Eur J Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 19(6):1643-52. PubMed ID: 15066160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Complexity of movement preparation and the spatiotemporal coupling of bimanual reach-to-grasp movements.
    Blinch J; Doan JB; Gonzalez CLR
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Jun; 236(6):1801-1813. PubMed ID: 29666884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Target-related coupling in bimanual reaching movements.
    Weigelt M; Rieger M; Mechsner F; Prinz W
    Psychol Res; 2007 Jul; 71(4):438-47. PubMed ID: 16397811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bimanual cross-talk during reaching movements is primarily related to response selection, not the specification of motor parameters.
    Hazeltine E; Diedrichsen J; Kennerley SW; Ivry RB
    Psychol Res; 2003 Feb; 67(1):56-70. PubMed ID: 12589450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of integrated feedback on discrete bimanual movements in choice reaction time.
    Blinch J; de Cellio Martins G; Chua R
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Jan; 235(1):247-257. PubMed ID: 27695912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of movement cues on intermanual interactions.
    Heuer H; Klein W
    Psychol Res; 2006 Jul; 70(4):229-44. PubMed ID: 16082546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Increased cognitive demands boost the spatial interference effect in bimanual pointing.
    Stanciu I; Biehl SC; Hesse C
    Psychol Res; 2017 May; 81(3):582-595. PubMed ID: 26935561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Resource limitations in bimanual pointing.
    Janczyk M; Schneider C; Hesse C
    Hum Mov Sci; 2022 Jun; 83():102939. PubMed ID: 35313236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Response Selection Contributes to the Preparation Cost for Bimanual Asymmetric Movements.
    Blinch J; Franks IM; Carpenter MG; Chua R
    J Mot Behav; 2018; 50(4):392-397. PubMed ID: 28876201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.