These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12669757)

  • 1. When a reappearance is old news: visual marking survives occlusion.
    Kunar MA; Humphreys GW; Smith KJ; Watson DG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Feb; 29(1):185-98. PubMed ID: 12669757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporal Binding and Segmentation in Visual Search: A Computational Neuroscience Analysis.
    Mavritsaki E; Humphreys G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 28(10):1553-67. PubMed ID: 27243617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Blink and you won't miss it: the preview benefit in visual marking survives internally generated eyeblinks.
    von Mühlenen A; Watson D; Gunnell DO
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1279-90. PubMed ID: 23398259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determining the capacity of time-based selection.
    Watson DG; Kunar MA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):350-66. PubMed ID: 22004197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prioritization by transients in visual search.
    Belopolsky AV; Theeuwes J; Kramer AF
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Feb; 12(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 15948285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selection of new objects by onset capture and visual marking.
    Osugi T; Hayashi D; Murakami I
    Vision Res; 2016 May; 122():21-33. PubMed ID: 27001341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual marking: the effects of irrelevant changes on preview search.
    Watson DG; Humphreys GW
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Apr; 67(3):418-34. PubMed ID: 16119391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preview benefit survives a three-dimensional rotation of the rigid configuration of search items.
    Osugi T; Murakami I
    Vision Res; 2019 Mar; 156():56-65. PubMed ID: 30682404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Object-based inhibitory priming in preview search: evidence from the "top-up" procedure.
    Kunar MA; Humphreys GW
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Apr; 34(3):459-74. PubMed ID: 16933757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Flexible feature-based inhibition in visual search mediates magnified impairments of selection: evidence from carry-over effects under dynamic preview-search conditions.
    Andrews LS; Watson DG; Humphreys GW; Braithwaite JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1007-16. PubMed ID: 21553995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual marking: the influence of temporary changes on time-based visual selection.
    Watson DG; Compton S; Bailey H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Dec; 37(6):1729-38. PubMed ID: 21517208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Onset of background dynamic noise attenuates preview benefit in inefficient visual search.
    Osugi T; Murakami I
    Vision Res; 2015 Jul; 112():33-44. PubMed ID: 25976299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual marking and change blindness: moving occluders and transient masks neutralize shape changes to ignored objects.
    Watson DG; Kunar MA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1391-405. PubMed ID: 20853998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual marking: prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects.
    Watson DG; Humphreys GW
    Psychol Rev; 1997 Jan; 104(1):90-122. PubMed ID: 9009881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual marking across eye blinks.
    Irwin DE; Humphreys GW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Feb; 20(1):128-34. PubMed ID: 23073720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An onset advantage without a preview benefit: neuropsychological evidence separating onset and preview effects in search.
    Humphreys GW; Olivers CN; Yoon EY
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Jan; 18(1):110-20. PubMed ID: 16417687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Out with the old: inhibition of old items in a preview search is limited.
    Emrich SM; Ruppel JD; Al-Aidroos N; Pratt J; Ferber S
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1552-7. PubMed ID: 19064497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is it impossible to inhibit isoluminant items, or does it simply take longer? Evidence from preview search.
    Braithwaite JJ; Hulleman J; Watson DG; Humphreys GW
    Percept Psychophys; 2006 Feb; 68(2):290-300. PubMed ID: 16773900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Filtering items of mass distraction: top-down biases against distractors are necessary for the feature-based carry-over to occur.
    Braithwaite JJ; Humphreys GW
    Vision Res; 2007 Jun; 47(12):1570-83. PubMed ID: 17459447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contingent visual marking by transients.
    Peterson MS; Belopolsky AV; Kramer AF
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Jul; 65(5):695-710. PubMed ID: 12956578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.