These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12670072)

  • 21. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations.
    Olmez A; Oztas N; Bodur H
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(6):713-9. PubMed ID: 15646229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fatigue behavior of the resin-resin bond of partially replaced resin-based composite restorations.
    Frankenberger R; Krämer N; Ebert J; Lohbauer U; Käppel S; ten Weges S; Petschelt A
    Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 12744407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of pre-heated composites and flowable liners on Class II gingival margin gap formation.
    Sabatini C; Blunck U; Denehy G; Munoz C
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):663-71. PubMed ID: 21180006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of light-curing method and irradiation time on marginal sealing and cavity wall adaptation of resin composite restorations.
    Yoshikawa T; Nakaoki Y; Takada T; Burrow MF; Tagami J
    Am J Dent; 2003 Sep; 16 Spec No():63A-67A. PubMed ID: 14674502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Microleakage in class II restorations: open vs closed centripetal build-up technique.
    Fabianelli A; Sgarra A; Goracci C; Cantoro A; Pollington S; Ferrari M
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):308-13. PubMed ID: 20533631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of curing unit and adhesive system on marginal adaptation of composite restorations.
    Casselli DS; Faria-e-Silva AL; Casselli H; Martins LR
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(6):e408-12. PubMed ID: 23220321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. On the effect of an internal light conductor on the marginal integrity of class-II composite fillings.
    Stoll R; Gente M; Palichleb M; Stachniss V
    Dent Mater; 2007 Feb; 23(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 16519928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
    Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influence of Cavity Margin Design and Restorative Material on Marginal Quality and Seal of Extended Class II Resin Composite Restorations In Vitro.
    Soliman S; Preidl R; Karl S; Hofmann N; Krastl G; Klaiber B
    J Adhes Dent; 2016; 18(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 26814320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cervical microleakage in composite restorations of primary teeth--in vitro study.
    Casagrande L; Brayner R; Barata JS; de Araujo FB
    J Dent; 2005 Sep; 33(8):627-32. PubMed ID: 16139693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Nanohybrid composite vs. fine hybrid composite in extended class II cavities: clinical and microscopic results after 2 years.
    Krämer N; Reinelt C; García-Godoy F; Taschner M; Petschelt A; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2009 Aug; 22(4):228-34. PubMed ID: 19824560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of accelerated restorative techniques on the microleakage of Class II composites.
    Uctasli S; Shortall AC; Burke FJ
    Am J Dent; 2002 Jun; 15(3):153-8. PubMed ID: 12469751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Class II composite resin restorations with two polymerization techniques: relationship between microtensile bond strength and marginal leakage.
    Cenci M; Demarco F; de Carvalho R
    J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):603-10. PubMed ID: 16005800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Soft-start polymerization and marginal gap formation in vitro.
    Sahafi A; Peutzfeldt A; Asmussen E
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):145-7. PubMed ID: 11572291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of the curing method and composite volume on marginal and internal adaptation of composite restoratives.
    Souza-Junior EJ; de Souza-Régis MR; Alonso RC; de Freitas AP; Sinhoreti MA; Cunha LG
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 21702671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effectiveness of different polymerization protocols for class II composite resin restorations.
    de Jong LC; Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JJ; Wolke JG; Geitenbeek B
    J Dent; 2007 Jun; 35(6):513-20. PubMed ID: 17383067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Microleakage of resin-based composite restorations with ceramic inserts.
    Kuramoto M; Matos AB; Matson E; Eduardo CP; Powers JM
    Am J Dent; 2000 Dec; 13(6):311-4. PubMed ID: 11764125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Role of delayed light polymerization of a dual-cured composite base on marginal adaptation of class II posterior composite open-sandwich restoration.
    Kamath U; Sheth H;
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):296. PubMed ID: 22945734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of different adhesive types and curing methods on microleakage and the marginal adaptation of composite veneers.
    Maleknejad F; Moosavi H; Shahriari R; Sarabi N; Shayankhah T
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 May; 10(3):18-26. PubMed ID: 19430622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.