274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12670135)
1. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: implant design and orientation.
Barrack RL
J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2003; 11(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 12670135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stem design and dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: clinical results and computer modeling.
Barrack RL; Butler RA; Laster DR; Andrews P
J Arthroplasty; 2001 Dec; 16(8 Suppl 1):8-12. PubMed ID: 11742444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios.
D'Lima DD; Urquhart AG; Buehler KO; Walker RH; Colwell CW
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Mar; 82(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 10724224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion.
Widmer KH; Zurfluh B
J Orthop Res; 2004 Jul; 22(4):815-21. PubMed ID: 15183439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ceramic-on-ceramic THA associated with fewer dislocations and less muscle degeneration by preserving muscle progenitors.
Hernigou P; Roussignol X; Delambre J; Poignard A; Flouzat-Lachaniette CH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3762-9. PubMed ID: 26054482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Impingement Free Motion in Total Hip Arthroplasty - How Can We Implement It?].
Widmer KH
Z Orthop Unfall; 2016 Aug; 154(4):392-7. PubMed ID: 27336842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of Acetabular Shell Position and Component Design on Hip Dynamic Dislocation.
Higuera Rueda CA; Ferguson DF; Scholl L; Klika AK
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Apr; 34(4):766-771. PubMed ID: 30639282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of femoral head size on impingement, dislocation and stress distribution in total hip replacement.
Kluess D; Martin H; Mittelmeier W; Schmitz KP; Bader R
Med Eng Phys; 2007 May; 29(4):465-71. PubMed ID: 16901743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intra-prosthetic dislocation of dual-mobility cups after total hip arthroplasty: potential causes from a clinical and biomechanical perspective.
Fabry C; Langlois J; Hamadouche M; Bader R
Int Orthop; 2016 May; 40(5):901-6. PubMed ID: 26429197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does dual-mobility cup geometry affect posterior horizontal dislocation distance?
Heffernan C; Banerjee S; Nevelos J; Macintyre J; Issa K; Markel DC; Mont MA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 May; 472(5):1535-44. PubMed ID: 24464508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Impingement-free, Prosthesis-specific, and Anatomy-adjusted Combined Target Zone for Component Positioning in THA Depends on Design and Implantation Parameters of both Components.
Widmer KH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Aug; 478(8):1904-1918. PubMed ID: 32732575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Theoretically optimum position of the prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty to fulfill the severe range of motion criteria due to neck impingement.
Hisatome T; Doi H
J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar; 16(2):229-37. PubMed ID: 21359509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of acetabular component orientation on dislocation propensity for small-head-size total hip arthroplasty.
Nadzadi ME; Pedersen DR; Callaghan JJ; Brown TD
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2002 Jan; 17(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 11779644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Small Random Angular Variations in Pelvic Tilt and Lower Extremity Can Cause Error in Static Image-based Preoperative Hip Arthroplasty Planning: A Computer Modeling Study.
Eslam Pour A; Lazennec JY; Patel KP; Anjaria MP; Beaulé PE; Schwarzkopf R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Apr; 480(4):818-828. PubMed ID: 35014975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What Safe Zone? The Vast Majority of Dislocated THAs Are Within the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Acetabular Component Position.
Abdel MP; von Roth P; Jennings MT; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 26150264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impingement-dislocation risk of total hip replacement: effects of cup orientation and patient maneuvers.
Ghaffari M; Nickmanesh R; Tamannaee N; Farahmand F
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():6801-4. PubMed ID: 23367491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acetabular alignment and primary arc of motion for minus, skirtless, and skirted 28-, 32-, 36-, and 40-mm femoral heads.
Kosashvili Y; Omoto D; Backstein D; Safir O; Lakstein D; Gross AE
J Arthroplasty; 2013 Feb; 28(2):279-285.e2. PubMed ID: 22854347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hip Abduction Can Be Considered the Sole Posterior Precaution Strategy to Lower the Rate of Impingement After Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty With Large Femoral Head: A Computer Simulation Study.
Eslam Pour A; Tung WS; Donnelley CA; Tommasini SM; Wiznia DH
J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jul; 38(7):1385-1391. PubMed ID: 36709882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Method for the evaluation of factors influencing the dislocation stability of total hip endoprotheses].
Bader R; Scholz R; Steinhauser E; Busch R; Mittelmeier W
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2004 May; 49(5):137-44. PubMed ID: 15212199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vivo kinematic analysis of replaced hip during stationary cycling and computer simulation of optimal cup positioning against prosthetic impingement.
Komiyama K; Hamai S; Ikebe S; Yoshimoto K; Higaki H; Shiomoto K; Gondo H; Hara D; Wang Y; Nakashima Y
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2019 Aug; 68():175-181. PubMed ID: 31229697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
