These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12670135)
1. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: implant design and orientation. Barrack RL J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2003; 11(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 12670135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stem design and dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: clinical results and computer modeling. Barrack RL; Butler RA; Laster DR; Andrews P J Arthroplasty; 2001 Dec; 16(8 Suppl 1):8-12. PubMed ID: 11742444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios. D'Lima DD; Urquhart AG; Buehler KO; Walker RH; Colwell CW J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Mar; 82(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 10724224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. Widmer KH; Zurfluh B J Orthop Res; 2004 Jul; 22(4):815-21. PubMed ID: 15183439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ceramic-on-ceramic THA associated with fewer dislocations and less muscle degeneration by preserving muscle progenitors. Hernigou P; Roussignol X; Delambre J; Poignard A; Flouzat-Lachaniette CH Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3762-9. PubMed ID: 26054482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Impingement Free Motion in Total Hip Arthroplasty - How Can We Implement It?]. Widmer KH Z Orthop Unfall; 2016 Aug; 154(4):392-7. PubMed ID: 27336842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of Acetabular Shell Position and Component Design on Hip Dynamic Dislocation. Higuera Rueda CA; Ferguson DF; Scholl L; Klika AK J Arthroplasty; 2019 Apr; 34(4):766-771. PubMed ID: 30639282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of femoral head size on impingement, dislocation and stress distribution in total hip replacement. Kluess D; Martin H; Mittelmeier W; Schmitz KP; Bader R Med Eng Phys; 2007 May; 29(4):465-71. PubMed ID: 16901743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intra-prosthetic dislocation of dual-mobility cups after total hip arthroplasty: potential causes from a clinical and biomechanical perspective. Fabry C; Langlois J; Hamadouche M; Bader R Int Orthop; 2016 May; 40(5):901-6. PubMed ID: 26429197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does dual-mobility cup geometry affect posterior horizontal dislocation distance? Heffernan C; Banerjee S; Nevelos J; Macintyre J; Issa K; Markel DC; Mont MA Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 May; 472(5):1535-44. PubMed ID: 24464508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Impingement-free, Prosthesis-specific, and Anatomy-adjusted Combined Target Zone for Component Positioning in THA Depends on Design and Implantation Parameters of both Components. Widmer KH Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Aug; 478(8):1904-1918. PubMed ID: 32732575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Theoretically optimum position of the prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty to fulfill the severe range of motion criteria due to neck impingement. Hisatome T; Doi H J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar; 16(2):229-37. PubMed ID: 21359509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of acetabular component orientation on dislocation propensity for small-head-size total hip arthroplasty. Nadzadi ME; Pedersen DR; Callaghan JJ; Brown TD Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2002 Jan; 17(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 11779644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Small Random Angular Variations in Pelvic Tilt and Lower Extremity Can Cause Error in Static Image-based Preoperative Hip Arthroplasty Planning: A Computer Modeling Study. Eslam Pour A; Lazennec JY; Patel KP; Anjaria MP; Beaulé PE; Schwarzkopf R Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Apr; 480(4):818-828. PubMed ID: 35014975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What Safe Zone? The Vast Majority of Dislocated THAs Are Within the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Acetabular Component Position. Abdel MP; von Roth P; Jennings MT; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 26150264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impingement-dislocation risk of total hip replacement: effects of cup orientation and patient maneuvers. Ghaffari M; Nickmanesh R; Tamannaee N; Farahmand F Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():6801-4. PubMed ID: 23367491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acetabular alignment and primary arc of motion for minus, skirtless, and skirted 28-, 32-, 36-, and 40-mm femoral heads. Kosashvili Y; Omoto D; Backstein D; Safir O; Lakstein D; Gross AE J Arthroplasty; 2013 Feb; 28(2):279-285.e2. PubMed ID: 22854347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hip Abduction Can Be Considered the Sole Posterior Precaution Strategy to Lower the Rate of Impingement After Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty With Large Femoral Head: A Computer Simulation Study. Eslam Pour A; Tung WS; Donnelley CA; Tommasini SM; Wiznia DH J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jul; 38(7):1385-1391. PubMed ID: 36709882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Method for the evaluation of factors influencing the dislocation stability of total hip endoprotheses]. Bader R; Scholz R; Steinhauser E; Busch R; Mittelmeier W Biomed Tech (Berl); 2004 May; 49(5):137-44. PubMed ID: 15212199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vivo kinematic analysis of replaced hip during stationary cycling and computer simulation of optimal cup positioning against prosthetic impingement. Komiyama K; Hamai S; Ikebe S; Yoshimoto K; Higaki H; Shiomoto K; Gondo H; Hara D; Wang Y; Nakashima Y Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2019 Aug; 68():175-181. PubMed ID: 31229697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]