640 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12672093)
1. Cytologic diagnosis of low-grade papillary urothelial neoplasms (low malignant potential and low-grade carcinoma) in the context of the 1998 WHO/ISUP classification.
Whisnant RE; Bastacky SI; Ohori NP
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Apr; 28(4):186-90. PubMed ID: 12672093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effects of the current World Health Organization/International Society of Urologic Pathologists bladder neoplasm classification system on urine cytology results.
Curry JL; Wojcik EM
Cancer; 2002 Jun; 96(3):140-5. PubMed ID: 12115301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the WHO/ISUP classification and cytokeratin 20 expression in predicting the behavior of low-grade papillary urothelial tumors. World/Health Organization/Internattional Society of Urologic Pathology.
Alsheikh A; Mohamedali Z; Jones E; Masterson J; Gilks CB
Mod Pathol; 2001 Apr; 14(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 11301341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Histologic grading of noninvasive papillary urothelial tumors: validation of the 1998 WHO/ISUP system by immunophenotyping and follow-up.
Yin H; Leong AS
Am J Clin Pathol; 2004 May; 121(5):679-87. PubMed ID: 15151208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is urinary tract cytology still useful for diagnosis of bladder carcinomas? A large series of 592 bladder washings using a five-category classification of different cytological diagnoses.
Garbar C; Mascaux C; Wespes E
Cytopathology; 2007 Apr; 18(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 17397491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Non-invasive papillary urothelial neoplasms: the 2004 WHO/ISUP classification system.
Miyamoto H; Miller JS; Fajardo DA; Lee TK; Netto GJ; Epstein JI
Pathol Int; 2010 Jan; 60(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 20055945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic classification of urothelial cells in urine cytology specimens using exclusively spectral information.
Jaganath R; Angeletti C; Levenson R; Rimm DL
Cancer; 2004 Jun; 102(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 15211478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Urothelial neoplasia of the urinary bladder--comparison of interobserver variability for WHO Classification 1972 with WHO/ISUP Consensus Classification 1998.
Mamoon N; Iqbal MA; Jamal S; Luqman M
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2006; 18(2):4-8. PubMed ID: 16977804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Usefulness of NMP22 as an adjunct to a typical urine cytology and low-grade urothelial carcinoma.
Arora VK; Sarungbam J; Bhatia A; Singh N; Agrawal V; Aggarwal S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2010 Nov; 38(11):788-90. PubMed ID: 20014314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of fluorescence in situ hybridization as an ancillary tool to urine cytology in diagnosing urothelial carcinoma.
Veeramachaneni R; Nordberg ML; Shi R; Herrera GA; Turbat-Herrera EA
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Jun; 28(6):301-7. PubMed ID: 12768634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Urothelial neoplasms in patients 20 years or younger: a clinicopathological analysis using the world health organization 2004 bladder consensus classification.
Fine SW; Humphrey PA; Dehner LP; Amin MB; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2005 Nov; 174(5):1976-80. PubMed ID: 16217372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic significance of the 2004 WHO/ISUP classification for prediction of recurrence, progression, and cancer-specific mortality of non-muscle-invasive urothelial tumors of the urinary bladder: a clinicopathologic study of 1,515 cases.
Pan CC; Chang YH; Chen KK; Yu HJ; Sun CH; Ho DM
Am J Clin Pathol; 2010 May; 133(5):788-95. PubMed ID: 20395527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Expression of MUC1 (Ma695) in noninvasive papillary urothelial neoplasm according to the 2004 World Health Organization classification of the noninvasive urothelial neoplasm. An immunologic tool for the pathologist?
Garbar C; Mascaux C
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2011 Oct; 33(5):277-82. PubMed ID: 22611755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Histologic grading of urothelial carcinoma: a reappraisal.
Cheng L; MacLennan GT; Lopez-Beltran A
Hum Pathol; 2012 Dec; 43(12):2097-108. PubMed ID: 22542126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential: reliability of diagnosis and outcome.
Campbell PA; Conrad RJ; Campbell CM; Nicol DL; MacTaggart P
BJU Int; 2004 Jun; 93(9):1228-31. PubMed ID: 15180612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multitarget fluorescence in situ hybridization assay detects transitional cell carcinoma in the majority of patients with bladder cancer and atypical or negative urine cytology.
Skacel M; Fahmy M; Brainard JA; Pettay JD; Biscotti CV; Liou LS; Procop GW; Jones JS; Ulchaker J; Zippe CD; Tubbs RR
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2101-5. PubMed ID: 12771727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Significance of denuded urothelium in papillary urothelial lesions.
Owens CL; Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 2007 Feb; 31(2):298-303. PubMed ID: 17255776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: comparison between the WHO/ISUP 1998 consensus classification and WHO 1999 classification system.
Holmäng S; Johansson SL
Urology; 2005 Aug; 66(2):274-8. PubMed ID: 16098355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential: evolving terminology and concepts.
Jones TD; Cheng L
J Urol; 2006 Jun; 175(6):1995-2003. PubMed ID: 16697785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Urinary cytology for carcinoma of the urinary bladder].
Nagumo S; Matuda M; Kuroda M
Rinsho Byori; 1992 Jul; 40(7):728-35. PubMed ID: 1507491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
