261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12672095)
1. Endoscopic bile duct brushing of malignant pancreatic biliary strictures: retrospective study with comparison of conventional smear and ThinPrep techniques.
Ylagan LR; Liu LH; Maluf HM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Apr; 28(4):196-204. PubMed ID: 12672095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pancreatic and bile duct brushing cytology in 1000 cases: review of findings and comparison of preparation methods.
Volmar KE; Vollmer RT; Routbort MJ; Creager AJ
Cancer; 2006 Aug; 108(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 16541448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of the ThinPrep method in bile duct brushings: analysis of morphologic parameters associated with malignancy and determination of interobserver reliability.
Waugh MS; Guy CD; Maygarden SJ; Livasy CA; Jones CK; Volmar KE
Diagn Cytopathol; 2008 Sep; 36(9):651-6. PubMed ID: 18677761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of routine cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of malignant bile duct strictures.
Kipp BR; Stadheim LM; Halling SA; Pochron NL; Harmsen S; Nagorney DM; Sebo TJ; Therneau TM; Gores GJ; de Groen PC; Baron TH; Levy MJ; Halling KC; Roberts LR
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1675-81. PubMed ID: 15330900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biliary brush cytology for the diagnosis of malignancy: a single center experience.
Stoos-Veić T; Bilić B; Kaić G; Ostović KT; Babić Z; Kujundzić M
Coll Antropol; 2010 Mar; 34(1):139-43. PubMed ID: 20432742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Brush cytology of the biliary tract: retrospective study of 278 cases with histopathologic correlation.
Govil H; Reddy V; Kluskens L; Treaba D; Massarani-Wafai R; Selvaggi S; Gattuso P
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 May; 26(5):273-7. PubMed ID: 11992366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic utility of peroral cholangioscopy for various bile-duct lesions.
Fukuda Y; Tsuyuguchi T; Sakai Y; Tsuchiya S; Saisyo H
Gastrointest Endosc; 2005 Sep; 62(3):374-82. PubMed ID: 16111955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biliary tract cytology in specimens obtained by direct cholangiographic procedures: a study of 74 cases.
de Peralta-Venturina MN; Wong DK; Purslow MJ; Kini SR
Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Jun; 14(4):334-48. PubMed ID: 8725136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. ERCP-directed brush cytology prepared by the Thinprep method: test performance and morphology of 149 cases.
Duggan MA; Brasher P; Medlicott SA
Cytopathology; 2004 Apr; 15(2):80-6. PubMed ID: 15056167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Brush cytology of the extrahepatic biliary tract: comparison of cytologic features of adenocarcinoma and benign biliary strictures.
Cohen MB; Wittchow RJ; Johlin FC; Bottles K; Raab SS
Mod Pathol; 1995 Jun; 8(5):498-502. PubMed ID: 7675767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cytologic criteria for well differentiated adenocarcinoma of the pancreas in fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimens.
Lin F; Staerkel G
Cancer; 2003 Feb; 99(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 12589645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cytologic features and diagnostic pitfalls of primary ampullary tumors by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy.
Defrain C; Chang CY; Srikureja W; Nguyen PT; Gu M
Cancer; 2005 Oct; 105(5):289-97. PubMed ID: 15986397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of endoscopic bile duct brushing in the evaluation of biliary strictures.
Trent V; Khurana KK; Pisharodi LR
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1999 Aug; 123(8):712-5. PubMed ID: 10420229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of ThinPrep and conventional smears in detecting carcinoma in bile duct brushings.
Siddiqui MT; Gokaslan ST; Saboorian MH; Carrick K; Ashfaq R
Cancer; 2003 Aug; 99(4):205-10. PubMed ID: 12925981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of ThinPrep and conventional preparations in pancreatic fine-needle aspiration biopsy.
de Luna R; Eloubeidi MA; Sheffield MV; Eltoum I; Jhala N; Jhala D; Chen VK; Chhieng DC
Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Feb; 30(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 14755754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Low-grade urothelial carcinoma: reappraisal of the cytologic criteria on ThinPrep.
Xin W; Raab SS; Michael CW
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Sep; 29(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 12951678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Usefulness of transpapillary bile duct brushing cytology and forceps biopsy for improved diagnosis in patients with biliary strictures.
Kitajima Y; Ohara H; Nakazawa T; Ando T; Hayashi K; Takada H; Tanaka H; Ogawa K; Sano H; Togawa S; Naito I; Hirai M; Ueno K; Ban T; Miyabe K; Yamashita H; Yoshimura N; Akita S; Gotoh K; Joh T
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Oct; 22(10):1615-20. PubMed ID: 17573833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective evaluation of brush cytology of biliary strictures during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Glasbrenner B; Ardan M; Boeck W; Preclik G; Möller P; Adler G
Endoscopy; 1999 Nov; 31(9):712-7. PubMed ID: 10604612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contrast-enhanced MRI combined with MR cholangiopancreatography for the evaluation of patients with biliary strictures: differentiation of malignant from benign bile duct strictures.
Kim JY; Lee JM; Han JK; Kim SH; Lee JY; Choi JY; Kim SJ; Kim HJ; Kim KH; Choi BI
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Aug; 26(2):304-12. PubMed ID: 17623893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cholangioscopic characterization of dominant bile duct stenoses in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.
Tischendorf JJ; Krüger M; Trautwein C; Duckstein N; Schneider A; Manns MP; Meier PN
Endoscopy; 2006 Jul; 38(7):665-9. PubMed ID: 16673310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
