These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12672572)

  • 1. Objective evaluation of the relative modulation transfer function of densitometers for digitisation of electron micrographs.
    Roseman AM; Neumann K
    Ultramicroscopy; 2003 Aug; 96(2):207-18. PubMed ID: 12672572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characterisation of the signal and noise transfer of CCD cameras for electron detection.
    Meyer RR; Kirkland AI
    Microsc Res Tech; 2000 May; 49(3):269-80. PubMed ID: 10816267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a 2k CCD camera with an epitaxially grown CsI scintillator for recording energy-filtered electron cryo-micrographs.
    Yasunaga T; Wakabayashi T
    J Electron Microsc (Tokyo); 2008 Jun; 57(3):101-12. PubMed ID: 18467743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High-throughput film-densitometry: an efficient approach to generate large data sets.
    Typke D; Nordmeyer RA; Jones A; Lee J; Avila-Sakar A; Downing KH; Glaeser RM
    J Struct Biol; 2005 Jan; 149(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 15629654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retrospective analysis of a detector fault for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5655-73. PubMed ID: 17047276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of scanners and CCD cameras for high-resolution TEM of protein crystals and single particles.
    Hesse J; Hebert H; Koeck PJ
    Microsc Res Tech; 2000 May; 49(3):292-300. PubMed ID: 10816269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of radiographic screen-film systems: a comparison between the use of a microdensitometer and a drum film digitiser.
    Verdun FR; Pachoud M; Bergmann D; Buhr E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):208-13. PubMed ID: 15933110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of a slow-scan CCD camera for macromolecular imaging in a 400 kV electron cryomicroscope.
    Sherman MB; Brink J; Chiu W
    Micron; 1996 Apr; 27(2):129-39. PubMed ID: 8858867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Does the orientation of the IOL in the eye play a role? Imaging quality of foldable intraocular lenses measured utilizing point spread function (PSF-measurement) and scanning electron microscopy cross-sectional images].
    Spraul CW; Rawer R; Stork W; Walther P; Lingenfelder C; Lang GK
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2005 Dec; 222(12):972-6. PubMed ID: 16380883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New high-DQE imaging plate scanner using the reflected readout laser signal for noise corrections.
    Bele P; Ochs R; Angert I; Schröder RR
    Microsc Res Tech; 2000 May; 49(3):281-91. PubMed ID: 10816268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Shack-Hartmann wave front measurements in cortical tissue for deconvolution of large three-dimensional mosaic transmitted light brightfield micrographs.
    Oberlaender M; Broser PJ; Sakmann B; Hippler S
    J Microsc; 2009 Feb; 233(2):275-89. PubMed ID: 19220694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Image quality of film transparency printer output of digital dental radiographs.
    Sakurai T; Matsumoto Y; Onoyama K; Kawamata R; Kashima I
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Apr; 99(4):490-5. PubMed ID: 15772599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rapid, rigorous computation of modulation transfer function on a pocket calculator.
    Ronai tpm ; kirch DL
    J Nucl Med; 1977 Jun; 18(6):579-83. PubMed ID: 870645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of the optical quality of intraocular lenses.
    Tognetto D; Sanguinetti G; Sirotti P; Cecchini P; Marcucci L; Ballone E; Ravalico G
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Aug; 45(8):2682-90. PubMed ID: 15277492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Investigations on the conditions of scanning on cell images by means of a microscope-TV-system (author's transl)].
    Harms H; Boseck S; Aus HM; Lenz V
    Microsc Acta; 1981 Sep; 85(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 7029218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A novel method for improvement of visualization of power spectra for sorting cryo-electron micrographs and their local areas.
    Jonić S; Sorzano CO; Cottevieille M; Larquet E; Boisset N
    J Struct Biol; 2007 Jan; 157(1):156-67. PubMed ID: 16987671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the validity of modulation transfer function evaluation techniques with application to small area and scanned digital detectors.
    Price BD; Esbrand CJ; Olivo A; Gibson AP; Hebden JC; Speller RD; Royle GJ
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2008 Nov; 79(11):113103. PubMed ID: 19045885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Advantages of CCD detectors for de novo three-dimensional structure determination in single-particle electron microscopy.
    Sander B; Golas MM; Stark H
    J Struct Biol; 2005 Jul; 151(1):92-105. PubMed ID: 15946861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development and application of programs to measure modulation transfer function, noise power spectrum and detective quantum efficiency.
    Padgett R; Kotre CJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):283-7. PubMed ID: 16461517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.