386 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12672840)
21. Survival and polyethylene wear of porous-coated acetabular components in patients less than fifty years old: results at nine to fourteen years.
Crowther JD; Lachiewicz PF
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 May; 84(5):729-35. PubMed ID: 12004013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Acetabular revision with impacted morsellised cancellous bone grafting and a cemented cup. A 15- to 20-year follow-up.
Schreurs BW; Bolder SB; Gardeniers JW; Verdonschot N; Slooff TJ; Veth RP
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2004 May; 86(4):492-7. PubMed ID: 15174541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Cementless Cup Supporter and Iliac Autograft: A Minimum of 15-Year Follow-Up.
Yoshino K; Tsukeoka T; Tsuneizumi Y; Lee TH; Nakamura J; Suzuki M; Ohtori S
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov; 32(11):3495-3501. PubMed ID: 28697865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Total hip arthroplasty with cement in patients who have rheumatoid arthritis. A minimum ten-year follow-up study.
Creighton MG; Callaghan JJ; Olejniczak JP; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1998 Oct; 80(10):1439-46. PubMed ID: 9801212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Acetabular re-revision with impaction bone grafting and a cemented polyethylene cup; a biological option for successive reconstructions.
Schreurs BW; Te Stroet MA; Rijnen WH; Gardeniers JW
Hip Int; 2015; 25(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 25362880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Bulk structural autogenous grafts and allografts for reconstruction of the acetabulum in total hip arthroplasty. Sixteen-year-average follow-up.
Shinar AA; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Feb; 79(2):159-68. PubMed ID: 9052535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. High proximal migration in cemented acetabular revisions operated with bone impaction grafting; 47 revision cups followed with RSA for 17 years.
Mohaddes M; Herberts P; Malchau H; Johanson PE; Kärrholm J
Hip Int; 2017 May; 27(3):251-258. PubMed ID: 27886360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Bone impaction grafting and a cemented cup after acetabular fracture at 3-18 years.
Schreurs BW; Zengerink M; Welten ML; van Kampen A; Slooff TJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2005 Aug; (437):145-51. PubMed ID: 16056042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Favorable Early Results of Impaction Bone Grafting With Reinforcement Mesh for the Treatment of Paprosky 3B Acetabular Defects.
Waddell BS; Boettner F; Gonzalez Della Valle A
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Mar; 32(3):919-923. PubMed ID: 27817994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Acetabular reconstruction with bone impaction grafting and a cemented cup: 20 years' experience.
Schreurs BW; Slooff TJ; Gardeniers JW; Buma P
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2001 Dec; (393):202-15. PubMed ID: 11764350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Short- and mid-term effectiveness of impaction bone allograft with acetabular components in treatment of severe acetabular defects].
Chen L; Hong G; Lin T; Huang L; Zhang Q; He W
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Mar; 34(3):341-346. PubMed ID: 32174080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five-year follow-up of fifty one hips.
Flecher X; Appy B; Parratte S; Ollivier M; Argenson JN
Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):911-916. PubMed ID: 27766385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Favorable Results of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty With Acetabular Impaction Bone Grafting for Large Segmental Bone Defects in Dysplastic Hips.
Iwase T; Morita D; Ito T; Takemoto G; Makida K
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2221-6. PubMed ID: 27133930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Acetabular reconstruction with impacted morcellized cancellous bone autograft and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty: a 10- to 17-year follow-up study.
Welten ML; Schreurs BW; Buma P; Verdonschot N; Slooff TJ
J Arthroplasty; 2000 Oct; 15(7):819-24. PubMed ID: 11061440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Acetabular reconstruction with impacted morsellised cancellous bone graft and cement. A 10- to 15-year follow-up of 60 revision arthroplasties.
Schreurs BW; Slooff TJ; Buma P; Gardeniers JW; Huiskes R
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1998 May; 80(3):391-5. PubMed ID: 9619924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone grafting and cemented polyethylene socket in total hip revision arthroplasty.
Kostensalo I; Seppänen M; Virolainen P; Mokka J; Koivisto M; Mäkelä KT
Scand J Surg; 2015 Dec; 104(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 25681057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Bone grafts in hip prosthesis revisions].
Krbec M; Adler J; Messner P
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2003; 70(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 12807040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. High placement of an acetabular component inserted without cement in a revision total hip arthroplasty. Results after a mean of ten years.
Dearborn JT; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Apr; 81(4):469-80. PubMed ID: 10225792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Acetabular revision after failed total hip arthroplasty in patients with congenital hip dislocation and dysplasia. Results after a mean of 8.6 years.
Dearborn JT; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Aug; 82(8):1146-53. PubMed ID: 10954105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A 2- to 16-Year Clinical Follow-Up of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a New Acetabular Implant Combined With Impacted Bone Allografts and a Cemented Cup.
Stigbrand H; Gustafsson O; Ullmark G
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Mar; 33(3):815-822. PubMed ID: 29153632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
