These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12673874)
1. [Wound management--1: Decubitus ulcer risk: how precise are established scales?]. Schlömer G; Meyer G Pflege Z; 2003 Feb; 56(2):134-7. PubMed ID: 12673874 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [The European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel: no scale is perfect]. Strobel A Pflege Z; 2001 Nov; 54(11):771. PubMed ID: 12607446 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [The agony of choice in wound management]. Protz K Pflege Z; 2010 Apr; 63(4):206-9. PubMed ID: 20426380 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in Mainland China. Kwong E; Pang S; Wong T; Ho J; Shao-ling X; Li-jun T Appl Nurs Res; 2005 May; 18(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 15991112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Validation of two scales for evaluation of the risk of decubitus ulcer: Gosnell and Nova-4]. García Fernández FP; Bermejo Cobo J; Pérez Catalán MJ; Ramírez Pérez C; Fernández Romo MA; Cano Luque MC; Luque Peña J; Cabrera Espinosa M; Pancorbo Hidalgo PL Rev Enferm; 1999 Oct; 22(10):suppl 685-7. PubMed ID: 10745869 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Pressure ulcer risk assessment immediately after cardiac surgery--does it make a difference? A comparison of three pressure ulcer risk assessment instruments within a cardiac surgery population. Feuchtinger J; Halfens R; Dassen T Nurs Crit Care; 2007; 12(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 17883663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Journal of wound care nursing. Comparing Norton and Medley. Williams C Nurs Times; 1991 Sep 4-10; 87(36):66, 68. PubMed ID: 1886816 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Value of corpitolinol 60 in geriatric decubitus prevention protocols. (GIPPS study)]. Meaume S; Colin D; Barrois B; Bohbot S; Allaert FA Soins; 2006 Apr; (704):19-22. PubMed ID: 16704002 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Non-blanchable erythema as an indicator for the need for pressure ulcer prevention: a randomized-controlled trial. Vanderwee K; Grypdonck M; Defloor T J Clin Nurs; 2007 Feb; 16(2):325-35. PubMed ID: 17239068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [1/6 Stage I decubitus ulcer]. Faucher N Soins Gerontol; 2006; (61):47. PubMed ID: 17063858 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Wound evaluation in decubitus ulcer. Assessment and differentiation]. Danzer S Pflege Z; 2012 Dec; 65(12):714-6. PubMed ID: 23330271 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Decubitus ulcers in oncology, first results of a study]. Fromantin I; Routkovsky-Norval C Soins; 2003 Apr; (674):22-3. PubMed ID: 12724987 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Decubitus ulcer in the hospital. Assessment for quality assurance?]. Püllen R; Heikaus C Krankenpfl J; 2002; 40(5-6):144-7. PubMed ID: 12271494 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Pressure ulcers: prevention should make prediction a thing of the past. Jones R Br J Community Nurs; 2002 Dec; ():8; author reply 8. PubMed ID: 12553316 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Predictive validity of the original and expanded Norton Scale in geriatric nursing]. Halek M; Mayer H Pflege; 2002 Dec; 15(6):309-17. PubMed ID: 12592768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic accuracy of two pressure ulcer risk scales and a generic nursing assessment tool. A psychometric comparison. Tannen A; Balzer K; Kottner J; Dassen T; Halfens R; Mertens E J Clin Nurs; 2010 Jun; 19(11-12):1510-8. PubMed ID: 20579196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]