199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12674921)
21. Nanoleakage of dentin adhesive systems bonded to Carisolv-treated dentin.
Kubo S; Li H; Burrow MF; Tyas MJ
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):387-95. PubMed ID: 12120777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. X-ray microtomography study to validate the efficacies of caries removal in primary molars by hand excavation and chemo-mechanical technique.
Ahmed M; Davis GR; Wong FS
Caries Res; 2012; 46(6):561-7. PubMed ID: 22922542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Evaluation of a new method of caries removal: in vivo study].
Lumbau A; Lai Bachisio S; Lai C; Lai V
Minerva Stomatol; 2003; 52(1-2):9-17. PubMed ID: 12686909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Chemo-mechanical caries removal: a review of the techniques and latest developments].
Beeley JA; Yip HK; Stevenson AG
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2001 Jul; 108(7):277-81. PubMed ID: 11486517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A scanning electron microscopic study of different caries removal techniques on human dentin.
Yazici AR; Ozgünaltay G; Dayangaç B
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):360-6. PubMed ID: 12120773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Does DIAGNOdent provide a reliable caries-removal endpoint?
Neves AA; Coutinho E; De Munck J; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
J Dent; 2011 May; 39(5):351-60. PubMed ID: 21334416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparative study of carious dentin removal by Er,Cr:YSGG laser and Carisolv.
Kinoshita J; Kimura Y; Matsumoto K
J Clin Laser Med Surg; 2003 Oct; 21(5):307-15. PubMed ID: 14651800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A comparative clinical study of various methods of caries removal in children.
Soni HK; Sharma A; Sood PB
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2015 Feb; 16(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 25391222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Various methods of caries removal in children: a comparative clinical study.
Pandit IK; Srivastava N; Gugnani N; Gupta M; Verma L
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2007; 25(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 17660645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of the efficacy of chemomechanical caries removal (Carisolv) with that of conventional excavation in reducing the cariogenic flora.
Azrak B; Callaway A; Grundheber A; Stender E; Willershausen B
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2004 May; 14(3):182-91. PubMed ID: 15139953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Removal of carious dentin by Er:YAG laser irradiation with and without carisolv.
Yamada Y; Hossain M; Suzuki N; Kinoshita JI; Nakamura Y; Matsumoto K
J Clin Laser Med Surg; 2001 Jun; 19(3):127-31. PubMed ID: 11469304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Clinical evaluation of the Carisolv chemomechanical caries removal technique according to the site/stage concept, a revised caries classification system.
Chaussain-Miller C; Decup F; Domejean-Orliaguet S; Gillet D; Guigand M; Kaleka R; Laboux O; Lafont J; Medioni E; Serfaty R; Toumelin-Chemla F; Tubiana J; Lasfargues JJ
Clin Oral Investig; 2003 Mar; 7(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 12673435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Behavioral and physiological changes in children with Down syndrome using mechanical and chemomechanical (Carisolv) caries removal methods.
Guaré Rde O; Ciamponi AL; Romano MM
Spec Care Dentist; 2008; 28(5):195-200. PubMed ID: 18782196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. How to make choice of the carious removal methods, Carisolv or traditional drilling? A meta-analysis.
Li R; Zhao Y; Ye L
J Oral Rehabil; 2014 Jun; 41(6):432-42. PubMed ID: 24661083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Chemical versus conventional caries removal techniques in primary teeth: a microhardness study.
Corrêa FN; Rocha Rde O; Rodrigues Filho LE; Muench A; Rodrigues CR
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2007; 31(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 17550045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of Carisolv for the chemo-mechanical removal of primary root caries in vivo.
Fure S; Lingström P; Birkhed D
Caries Res; 2000; 34(3):275-80. PubMed ID: 10867428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Interfacial micromorphology of three adhesive systems created in caries-affected dentin.
Sakoolnamarka R; Burrow MF; Tyas MJ
Am J Dent; 2003 Jun; 16(3):202-6. PubMed ID: 12967076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. An in vitro investigation of microtensile bond strengths of two dentine adhesives to caries-affected dentine.
Sonoda H; Banerjee A; Sherriff M; Tagami J; Watson TF
J Dent; 2005 Apr; 33(4):335-42. PubMed ID: 15781141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of the methodologies used in clinical trials and effectiveness of chemo-mechanical caries removal with Carisolv.
Marquezan M; Faraco Junior IM; Feldens CA; Tovo MF; Ottoni AB
Braz Oral Res; 2006; 20(4):364-71. PubMed ID: 17242800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of mechanical and chemomechanical methods of caries removal in deciduous and permanent teeth: a SEM study.
Avinash A; Grover SD; Koul M; Nayak MT; Singhvi A; Singh RK
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 22918095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
