381 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12674968)
1. Sterilizer monitoring: a vital component for infection control.
Stine RM
Tex Dent J; 2003 Feb; 120(2):182-5. PubMed ID: 12674968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Instrument sterilization and beyond.
Miller CH
Am J Dent; 2002 Apr; 15(2):137-8. PubMed ID: 12092992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Sterilization update 2003.
Harte JA; Miller CH
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2004 Jan; 25(1 Suppl):24-9. PubMed ID: 15641331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sterilizer monitoring: option or responsibility?
Lado EA; Stout FW
Gen Dent; 1994; 42(6):560-3. PubMed ID: 23087987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Update on infection control.
Dental Protection Limited
SADJ; 1999 Dec; 54(12):641-3. PubMed ID: 16892574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sterilizer monitoring: rationale for using biological indicators.
Staat RH
Dent Today; 2004 Nov; 23(11):130-3; quiz 133. PubMed ID: 15622888
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Sterilizer.
ADA Division of Science, ADA Council on Scientific Affairs
J Am Dent Assoc; 2004 Jan; 135(1):106-9. PubMed ID: 14959883
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness of the dental instrument cassette in the practice setting.
Risk WB
J Indiana Dent Assoc; 1997; 76(3):29-30. PubMed ID: 9518749
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Handpiece sterilization: is it really necessary?
Young JM
J Calif Dent Assoc; 1996 Jan; 24(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 9063183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Infection control for the dental hygienist of the nineties. Part 2: Sterilization, operatory asepsis, and instrument recirculation.
Tolle-Watts L
Semin Dent Hyg; 1993 Oct; 4(2):1-6; quiz 6-7. PubMed ID: 9487950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Indiana dentists surveyed for effectiveness of biological testing of heat sterilization units.
Hazelrigg CO; Smith CE
J Indiana Dent Assoc; 1995; 74(3):18-9; quiz 20. PubMed ID: 9517353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The effectiveness of glass bead sterilizer in the dental practice].
Zadik Y; Peretz A
Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2008 Apr; 25(2):36-9, 75. PubMed ID: 18780544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Investigating sterilizer test failures.
Hughes CA
Tex Dent J; 1998 Apr; 115(4):40-1. PubMed ID: 9667204
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Have faith in the validity of biological monitoring.
Miller C
RDH; 1995 Jan; 15(1):29. PubMed ID: 8619078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Instrument circulation, Part 1.
Weintraub A
Dent Today; 1995 Oct; 14(10):94-5, 97. PubMed ID: 9540653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of the effectiveness of dental sterilizers using biological monitors.
McErlane B; Rosebush WJ; Waterfield JD
J Can Dent Assoc; 1992 Jun; 58(6):481-3. PubMed ID: 1633580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sterilization. Disciplined microbial control.
Miller CH
Dent Clin North Am; 1991 Apr; 35(2):339-55. PubMed ID: 2032579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Quality of the sterilization process in the dental practice].
de Graaff J; Eijkman MA
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1997 Sep; 104(9):342-5; discussion 346-7. PubMed ID: 11924423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Operation and monitoring of office sterilizers.
Palenik CJ
Dent Assist; 2007; 76(6):28-9. PubMed ID: 18237085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Instrument circulation, Part 2.
Weintraub A
Dent Today; 1996 Feb; 15(2):90-3. PubMed ID: 9567146
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
