These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12675455)

  • 1. Changes in water contact angles during the first phase of setting of dental impression materials.
    Mondon M; Ziegler C
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 12675455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The dynamic interaction of water with four dental impression materials during cure.
    Hosseinpour D; Berg JC
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):292-300. PubMed ID: 19210607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigation of a new approach to measuring contact angles for hydrophilic impression materials.
    Kugel G; Klettke T; Goldberg JA; Benchimol J; Perry RD; Sharma S
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(2):84-92. PubMed ID: 17362417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contact angles of contemporary type 3 impression materials.
    Balkenhol M; Eichhorn M; Wostmann B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):396-8. PubMed ID: 19639079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Temperature effects on the rheological properties of current polyether and polysiloxane impression materials during setting.
    Berg JC; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Adán-Plaza S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):150-61. PubMed ID: 12886208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surface detail reproduction of elastomeric impression materials related to rheological properties.
    German MJ; Carrick TE; McCabe JF
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jul; 24(7):951-6. PubMed ID: 18164051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of glow-discharge and surfactant treatments on the wettability of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    Erkut S; Can G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):356-63. PubMed ID: 15798686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
    Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hydrophilicity of unset and set elastomeric impression materials.
    Rupp F; Geis-Gerstorfer J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(6):552-4. PubMed ID: 21209992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of relative humidity on the hydrophilicity of unset elastomeric impression materials.
    Rupp F; Axmann D; Geis-Gerstorfer J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 18350951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Wettability of impression materials treated with disinfectants.
    DeWald JP; Nakajima H; Schniederman E; Okabe T
    Am J Dent; 1992 Apr; 5(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 1524745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of mixing technique on shrinkage rate of one polyether and two polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
    Lampé I; Marton S; Hegedüs C
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):590. PubMed ID: 15543917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changes in properties of nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials after storage of components.
    Hondrum SO
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 11174682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Flow profile of regular and fast-setting elastomeric impression materials using a shark fin testing device.
    Lawson NC; Cakir D; Ramp L; Burgess JO
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2011 Jun; 23(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 21649832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of prolonged setting time on permanent deformation of elastomeric impression materials.
    Balkenhol M; Haunschild S; Erbe C; Wöstmann B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 May; 103(5):288-94. PubMed ID: 20416412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contact angle of unset elastomeric impression materials.
    Menees TS; Radhakrishnan R; Ramp LC; Burgess JO; Lawson NC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):536-42. PubMed ID: 26187106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations.
    Ragain JC; Grosko ML; Raj M; Ryan TN; Johnston WM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 11203635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Moisture effect on polyether and polyvinylsiloxane dimensional accuracy and detail reproduction.
    Walker MP; Petrie CS; Haj-Ali R; Spencer P; Dumas C; Williams K
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Sep; 14(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 16336232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of mixing technique on surface characteristics of impression materials.
    Lepe X; Johnson GH; Berg JC; Aw TC
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 May; 79(5):495-502. PubMed ID: 9597600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The wetting of surface-treated silicone impression materials by gypsum mixes containing disinfectants and modifiers.
    Abdelaziz KM; Combe EC; Hodges JS
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Jun; 14(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 16011621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.