967 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12675458)
1. Fatigue load of teeth restored with bonded direct composite and indirect ceramic inlays in MOD class II cavity preparations.
Shor A; Nicholls JI; Phillips KM; Libman WJ
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 12675458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
Ozturk N; Aykent F
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tensile bond strength and flexural modulus of resin cements--influence on the fracture resistance of teeth restored with ceramic inlays.
Habekost Lde V; Camacho GB; Demarco FF; Powers JM
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):488-95. PubMed ID: 17910226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials.
Dalpino PH; Francischone CE; Ishikiriama A; Franco EB
Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 12691276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of fracture resistance of teeth restored with ceramic inlay and resin composite: an in vitro study.
Desai PD; Das UK
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):877. PubMed ID: 22484893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Resistance to maxillary premolar fractures after restoration of class II preparations with resin composite or ceromer.
de Freitas CR; Miranda MI; de Andrade MF; Flores VH; Vaz LG; Guimarães C
Quintessence Int; 2002 Sep; 33(8):589-94. PubMed ID: 12238690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars restored with direct and indirect adhesive techniques.
Santos MJ; Bezerra RB
J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Sep; 71(8):585. PubMed ID: 16202199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of an antibacterial adhesive on the bond strength of three different luting resin composites.
Cal E; Türkün LS; Türkün M; Toman M; Toksavul S
J Dent; 2006 Jul; 34(6):372-80. PubMed ID: 16288949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of mechanical loading on the cusp defection of premolars restored with direct and indirect techniques.
Zamboni SC; Nogueira L; Bottino MA; Sobrinho LC; Valandro LF
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Jan; 15(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 24939269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Molar fracture resistance after adhesive restoration with ceramic inlays or resin-based composites.
Bremer BD; Geurtsen W
Am J Dent; 2001 Aug; 14(4):216-20. PubMed ID: 11699740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with indirect-composite and ceramic inlay systems.
Soares CJ; Martins LR; Pfeifer JM; Giannini M
Quintessence Int; 2004 Apr; 35(4):281-6. PubMed ID: 15119713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Shear bond strength between feldspathic CAD/CAM ceramic and human dentine for two adhesive cements.
Graiff L; Piovan C; Vigolo P; Mason PN
J Prosthodont; 2008 Jun; 17(4):294-9. PubMed ID: 18266655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. All-ceramic partial coverage restorations on natural molars. Masticatory fatigue loading and fracture resistance.
Stappert CF; Guess PC; Chitmongkolsuk S; Gerds T; Strub JR
Am J Dent; 2007 Feb; 20(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 17380803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface.
Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.
Yamada Y; Tsubota Y; Fukushima S
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 15008239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fracture resistance of re-attached coronal fragments--influence of different adhesive materials and bevel preparation.
Demarco FF; Fay RM; Pinzon LM; Powers JM
Dent Traumatol; 2004 Jun; 20(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 15144447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microleakage in ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements.
Mota CS; Demarco FF; Camacho GB; Powers JM
J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 12729085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
