These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12676055)

  • 1. Signal strength determines the nature of the relationship between perception and working memory.
    Sheth BR; Shimojo S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Feb; 15(2):173-84. PubMed ID: 12676055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceiving a discontinuity in motion.
    Nieman D; Sheth BR; Shimojo S
    J Vis; 2010 Jun; 10(6):9. PubMed ID: 20884558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual motion perception at the time of saccadic eye movements and its relation to spatial mislocalization.
    Lee C; Lee J
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2005 Apr; 1039():160-5. PubMed ID: 15826970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gaze-centered updating of remembered visual space during active whole-body translations.
    Van Pelt S; Medendorp WP
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 97(2):1209-20. PubMed ID: 17135474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Priming of first- and second-order motion: mechanisms and neural substrates.
    Campana G; Pavan A; Casco C
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(2):393-8. PubMed ID: 17825851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensory memory for ambiguous vision.
    Pearson J; Brascamp J
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2008 Sep; 12(9):334-41. PubMed ID: 18684661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Feature-based attention influences contextual interactions during motion repulsion.
    Tzvetanov T; Womelsdorf T; Niebergall R; Treue S
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(21):3651-8. PubMed ID: 16828839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mechanisms of feature- and space-based attention: response modulation and baseline increases.
    McMains SA; Fehd HM; Emmanouil TA; Kastner S
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Oct; 98(4):2110-21. PubMed ID: 17671104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Human updating of visual motion direction during head rotations.
    Ruiz-Ruiz M; Martinez-Trujillo JC
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 May; 99(5):2558-76. PubMed ID: 18337365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extraction of percept-related induced local field potential during spontaneously reversing perception.
    Wang Z; Logothetis NK; Liang H
    Neural Netw; 2009; 22(5-6):720-7. PubMed ID: 19608383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual manifestations of fast neural plasticity: motion priming, rapid motion aftereffect and perceptual sensitization.
    Kanai R; Verstraten FA
    Vision Res; 2005 Nov; 45(25-26):3109-16. PubMed ID: 16023173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. "What" and "where" in visual working memory: a computational neurodynamical perspective for integrating FMRI and single-neuron data.
    Deco G; Rolls ET; Horwitz B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 May; 16(4):683-701. PubMed ID: 15165356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differential involvement of the cerebellum in biological and coherent motion perception.
    Jokisch D; Troje NF; Koch B; Schwarz M; Daum I
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Jun; 21(12):3439-46. PubMed ID: 16026481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of feature-based attention on the motion aftereffect at remote locations.
    Boynton GM; Ciaramitaro VM; Arman AC
    Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(18):2968-76. PubMed ID: 16698060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Loss of positional information when tracking multiple moving dots: the role of visual memory.
    Narasimhan S; Tripathy SP; Barrett BT
    Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(1):10-27. PubMed ID: 18930074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual search in clutter.
    Verghese P; McKee SP
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1217-25. PubMed ID: 15066387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Behavioral receptive field for ocular following in humans: dynamics of spatial summation and center-surround interactions.
    Barthélemy FV; Vanzetta I; Masson GS
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 Jun; 95(6):3712-26. PubMed ID: 16554515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The global processing deficit in amblyopia involves noise segregation.
    Mansouri B; Hess RF
    Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(24):4104-17. PubMed ID: 17007900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preexposure disrupts learning of location-contingent perceptual biases for ambiguous stimuli.
    van Dam LC; Ernst MO
    J Vis; 2010 Jul; 10(8):15. PubMed ID: 20884590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The spatio-temporal tuning of the mechanisms in the control of saccadic eye movements.
    White BJ; Kerzel D; Gegenfurtner KR
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(22):3886-97. PubMed ID: 16879855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.