These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12676273)

  • 21. Increased negative emotional responses in PROP supertasters.
    Macht M; Mueller J
    Physiol Behav; 2007 Feb; 90(2-3):466-72. PubMed ID: 17141813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Binary taste mixture interactions in prop non-tasters, medium-tasters and super-tasters.
    Prescott J; Ripandelli N; Wakeling I
    Chem Senses; 2001 Oct; 26(8):993-1003. PubMed ID: 11595676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Taste responses of cortical neurons in freely ingesting rats.
    Yamamoto T; Matsuo R; Kiyomitsu Y; Kitamura R
    J Neurophysiol; 1989 Jun; 61(6):1244-58. PubMed ID: 2746324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mouth rinsing and ingesting salty or bitter solutions does not influence corticomotor excitability or neuromuscular function.
    Gray E; Cavaleri R; Siegler J
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2023 Jun; 123(6):1179-1189. PubMed ID: 36700971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Methods of taste sensitivity examination].
    Klimacka-Nawrot E; Suchecka W
    Wiad Lek; 2008; 61(7-9):207-10. PubMed ID: 19172833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The development of basic taste sensitivity and preferences in children.
    Fry Vennerød FF; Nicklaus S; Lien N; Almli VL
    Appetite; 2018 Aug; 127():130-137. PubMed ID: 29729324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparative evaluation of gustatory function between postmenopausal women and age-matched men.
    Dangore-Khasbage SB; Degwekar SS; Bhowate RR; Motwani MB; Indurkar AD; Lohe VK; Babar VY
    Oral Dis; 2010 Jul; 16(5):469-75. PubMed ID: 20412453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of linoleic acid on sweet, sour, salty, and bitter taste thresholds and intensity ratings of adults.
    Mattes RD
    Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol; 2007 May; 292(5):G1243-8. PubMed ID: 17290007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Constructing quality profiles for taste compounds in rats: a novel paradigm.
    Grobe CL; Spector AC
    Physiol Behav; 2008 Oct; 95(3):413-24. PubMed ID: 18664369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Olfaction and taste processing in autism.
    Bennetto L; Kuschner ES; Hyman SL
    Biol Psychiatry; 2007 Nov; 62(9):1015-21. PubMed ID: 17572391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Taste thresholds of individuals with diabetes mellitus and of control subjects.
    Hardy SL; Brennand CP; Wyse BW
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1981 Sep; 79(3):286-9. PubMed ID: 7264114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A new whole-mouth gustatory test procedure. 1. Thresholds and principal components analysis in healthy men and women.
    Yamauchi Y; Endo S; Sakai F; Yoshimura I
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 2002; (546):39-48. PubMed ID: 12132620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Gustatory differences in hypothyroid and hyperthyroid tasters and non-tasters.
    Bhatia S; Sircar SS; Ghorai BK
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 1990 Jul; 34(3):201-5. PubMed ID: 2286424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Confusing tastes and smells: how odours can influence the perception of sweet and sour tastes.
    Stevenson RJ; Prescott J; Boakes RA
    Chem Senses; 1999 Dec; 24(6):627-35. PubMed ID: 10587495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Analysis of facial expressions in response to basic taste stimuli using artificial intelligence to predict perceived hedonic ratings.
    Yamamoto T; Mizuta H; Ueji K
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0250928. PubMed ID: 33945568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Taste function in patients with oral burning.
    Formaker BK; Frank ME
    Chem Senses; 2000 Oct; 25(5):575-81. PubMed ID: 11015329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Basic emotions evoked by eugenol odor differ according to the dental experience. A neurovegetative analysis.
    Robin O; Alaoui-Ismaïli O; Dittmar A; Vernet-Maury E
    Chem Senses; 1999 Jun; 24(3):327-35. PubMed ID: 10400451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sensitivity of three loci on the tongue and soft palate to four basic tastes in smokers and non-smokers.
    Sato K; Endo S; Tomita H
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 2002; (546):74-82. PubMed ID: 12132625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Age and sex effects on taste of sucrose, NaCl, citric acid and caffeine.
    Hyde RJ; Feller RP
    Neurobiol Aging; 1981; 2(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 7335149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Predicting consumer liking and preference based on emotional responses and sensory perception: A study with basic taste solutions.
    Samant SS; Chapko MJ; Seo HS
    Food Res Int; 2017 Oct; 100(Pt 1):325-334. PubMed ID: 28873694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.