These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12677107)

  • 1. Deriving the real-ear SPL of audiometric data using the "coupler to dial difference" and the "real ear to coupler difference".
    Munro KJ; Davis J
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):100-10. PubMed ID: 12677107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of RECD transducer when deriving real-ear sound pressure level.
    Munro KJ; Millward KE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):409-23. PubMed ID: 16825890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is the real-ear to coupler difference independent of the measurement earphone?
    Munro KJ; Salisbury VA
    Int J Audiol; 2002 Oct; 41(7):408-13. PubMed ID: 12403609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measuring the real-ear to coupler difference transfer function with an insert earphone and a hearing instrument: are they the same?
    Munro KJ; Toal S
    Ear Hear; 2005 Feb; 26(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 15692302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of the 'real-ear to dial difference' to derive real-ear SPL from hearing level obtained with insert earphones.
    Munro KJ; Lazenby A
    Br J Audiol; 2001 Oct; 35(5):297-306. PubMed ID: 11824532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Customized acoustic transform functions and their accuracy at predicting real-ear hearing aid performance.
    Munro KJ; Hatton N
    Ear Hear; 2000 Feb; 21(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 10708074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the Repeatability and Accuracy of the Wideband Real-Ear-to-Coupler Difference.
    Vaisberg JM; Folkeard P; Pumford J; Narten P; Scollie S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Jun; 29(6):520-532. PubMed ID: 29863466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Psychophysical and Physical Measurements of Real Ear to Coupler Differences.
    Koning R; Wouters J; Francart T
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):543-9. PubMed ID: 25822646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perforation of the tympanic membrane and its effect on the real-ear-to-coupler difference acoustic transform function.
    Martin HC; Munro KJ; Lam MC
    Br J Audiol; 2001 Aug; 35(4):259-64. PubMed ID: 11694100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of real-ear to coupler difference values in the right and left ear of hearing aid users.
    Munro KJ; Howlin EM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):146-50. PubMed ID: 19745743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of real-ear to coupler difference values in the right and left ear of adults using three earmold configurations.
    Munro KJ; Buttfield LM
    Ear Hear; 2005 Jun; 26(3):290-8. PubMed ID: 15937410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using the Real-Ear-to-Coupler Difference within the American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guideline: Protocols for Applying and Predicting Earmold RECDs.
    Moodie S; Pietrobon J; Rall E; Lindley G; Eiten L; Gordey D; Davidson L; Moodie KS; Bagatto M; Haluschak MM; Folkeard P; Scollie S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Mar; 27(3):264-275. PubMed ID: 26967366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validity and repeatability of level-independent HL to SPL transforms.
    Scollie SD; Seewald RC; Cornelisse LE; Jenstad LM
    Ear Hear; 1998 Oct; 19(5):407-13. PubMed ID: 9796649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of earmold fit on predicted real ear SPL using a real ear to coupler difference procedure.
    Hoover BM; Stelmachowicz PG; Lewis DE
    Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):310-7. PubMed ID: 10981607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of tubing length and coupling method on hearing threshold and real-ear to coupler difference measures.
    Gustafson S; Pittman A; Fanning R
    Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):190-9. PubMed ID: 23800818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of Real-Ear Adjusted Stimuli on Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential Variability in Children and Young Adults.
    Hernon EE; Patterson JN; Fitzpatrick D; Janky KL
    Ear Hear; 2023 Jul-Aug 01; 44(4):854-864. PubMed ID: 36648319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validity and reliability of integrated pressure level real-ear-to-coupler difference measurements.
    Urichuk M; Purcell D; Scollie S
    Int J Audiol; 2024 Jun; 63(6):401-410. PubMed ID: 37129231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Longitudinal changes in real-ear to coupler difference measurements in infants.
    Bingham K; Jenstad LM; Shahnaz N
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Oct; 20(9):558-68. PubMed ID: 19902703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy and reliability of a real-ear-to-coupler difference measurement procedure implemented within a behind-the-ear hearing aid.
    Scollie S; Bagatto M; Moodie S; Crukley J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Oct; 22(9):612-622. PubMed ID: 22192606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.