452 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12677110)
21. Clinical feasibility of fast psychophysical tuning curves evaluated using normally hearing adults: success rate, range of tip shift, repeatability, and comparison of methods used for estimation of frequency at the tip.
Myers J; Malicka AN
Int J Audiol; 2014 Dec; 53(12):887-94. PubMed ID: 25156231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Relations between pure-tone threshold and discrimination of monosyllables in inner ear high-frequency hearing disorders].
Battmer RD; Lehnhardt E
HNO; 1984 Feb; 32(2):69-73. PubMed ID: 6706703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. An assessment of threshold shifts in nonprofessional pop/rock musicians using conventional and extended high-frequency audiometry.
Schmuziger N; Patscheke J; Probst R
Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):643-8. PubMed ID: 17804978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Simulating psychophysical tuning curves in listeners with dead regions.
Warnaar B; Jepsen ML; Dreschler WA
Int J Audiol; 2013 Aug; 52(8):533-44. PubMed ID: 23786395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Enhanced frequency discrimination near the hearing loss cut-off: a consequence of central auditory plasticity induced by cochlear damage?
Thai-Van H; Micheyl C; Moore BC; Collet L
Brain; 2003 Oct; 126(Pt 10):2235-45. PubMed ID: 12847078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.
Reavis KM; Phillips DS; Fausti SA; Gordon JS; Helt WJ; Wilmington D; Bratt GW; Konrad-Martin D
Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Repeatability of the TEN(HL) test for detecting cochlear dead regions.
Cairns S; Frith R; Munro KJ; Moore BC
Int J Audiol; 2007 Oct; 46(10):575-84. PubMed ID: 17922347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Characterizing auditory processing and perception in individual listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
Jepsen ML; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):262-81. PubMed ID: 21303008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Frequency discrimination in ears with and without contralateral cochlear dead regions.
Heggdal PO; Lind O; Brännström KJ
Int J Audiol; 2013 Aug; 52(8):553-7. PubMed ID: 23786393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Reaction times at auditory threshold: a comparison of normal hearing probands and patients with hearing damage].
Hustert B; Kumpf W; Stoll W
Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Mar; 75(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 8652028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Modification of the Threshold Equalising Noise (TEN) test for cochlear dead regions for use with steeply sloping high-frequency hearing loss.
Markessis E; Kapadia S; Munro K; Moore BC
Int J Audiol; 2006 Feb; 45(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 16566247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of tinnitus patients with normal hearing sensitivity using TEOAEs and TEN test.
Thabet EM
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Dec; 36(6):633-6. PubMed ID: 19285816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Two experiments on subtle mid-frequency hearing loss and its influence on word discrimination in noise-exposed listeners.
Humes LE; Schwartz DM; Bess FH
Audiology; 1979; 18(4):307-19. PubMed ID: 475663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Contribution of high frequencies to speech recognition in quiet and noise in listeners with varying degrees of high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
Amos NE; Humes LE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):819-34. PubMed ID: 17675588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A psychophysical evaluation of spectral enhancement.
DiGiovanni JJ; Nelson PB; Schlauch RS
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1121-35. PubMed ID: 16411801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Role of probe tone parameters in frequency selectivity for normal listeners.
Abel SM; Cheskes MB; Giguere C
J Otolaryngol; 1989 Aug; 18(5):205-9. PubMed ID: 2769832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Amplitude modulation detection by listeners with unilateral dead regions.
Moore BC; Vinay
J Am Acad Audiol; 2009; 20(10):597-606. PubMed ID: 20503798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. No cochlear dead regions detected in non-pulsatile tinnitus patients: an assessment with the threshold equalizing noise (sound pressure level) test.
Gilles A; De Ridder D; Van de Heyning P
Noise Health; 2013; 15(63):129-33. PubMed ID: 23571303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Factors affecting outcomes on the TEN (SPL) test in adults with hearing loss.
Hornsby BW; Dundas JA
J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Apr; 20(4):251-63. PubMed ID: 19927697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [The application of the same frequency tone masking test in forensic identification].
Liu JH; Xu JT; Li YF
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 May; 21(2):81-3. PubMed ID: 15931742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
