BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12677327)

  • 1. Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion: obstacle avoidance is not the explanation.
    Franz VH; Bülthoff HH; Fahle M
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Apr; 149(4):470-7. PubMed ID: 12677327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The functional subdivision of the visual brain: Is there a real illusion effect on action? A multi-lab replication study.
    Kopiske KK; Bruno N; Hesse C; Schenk T; Franz VH
    Cortex; 2016 Jun; 79():130-52. PubMed ID: 27156056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion are ambiguous.
    Gilster R; Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP; Wiesner CD; Ferstl R
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 May; 171(3):416-20. PubMed ID: 16710685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A temporal analysis of grasping in the Ebbinghaus illusion: planning versus online control.
    Danckert JA; Sharif N; Haffenden AM; Schiff KC; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 May; 144(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 12012166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion on different behaviors: one- and two-handed grasping; one- and two-handed manual estimation; metric and comparative judgment.
    Vishton PM; Fabre E
    Spat Vis; 2003; 16(3-4):377-92. PubMed ID: 12858958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Grasping visual illusions: consistent data and no dissociation.
    Franz VH; Gegenfurtner KR
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2008; 25(7-8):920-50. PubMed ID: 19378412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dual processes underlie the effect of the Ebbinghaüs illusion on control of grasping.
    Chen Z; Zhang N; Saunders JA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 Nov; 47(11):1472-1492. PubMed ID: 34843356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion on children's perception and grasping.
    Duemmler T; Franz VH; Jovanovic B; Schwarzer G
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Mar; 186(2):249-60. PubMed ID: 18057923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Sander parallelogram illusion dissociates action and perception despite control for the litany of past confounds.
    Whitwell RL; Goodale MA; Merritt KE; Enns JT
    Cortex; 2018 Jan; 98():163-176. PubMed ID: 29100659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attractive Contours of the Ebbinghaus Illusion.
    Sherman JA; Chouinard PA
    Percept Mot Skills; 2016 Feb; 122(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 27420308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are perception and action affected differently by the Titchener circles illusion?
    Pavani F; Boscagli I; Benvenuti F; Rabuffetti M; Farnè A
    Exp Brain Res; 1999 Jul; 127(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 10424418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Grasping visual illusions: no evidence for a dissociation between perception and action.
    Franz VH; Gegenfurtner KR; Bülthoff HH; Fahle M
    Psychol Sci; 2000 Jan; 11(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 11228838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of the Ebbinghaus illusion on grasping behaviour of children.
    Hanisch C; Konczak J; Dohle C
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Mar; 137(2):237-45. PubMed ID: 11315553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dynamic effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion in grasping: support for a planning/control model of action.
    Glover S; Dixon P
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 Feb; 64(2):266-78. PubMed ID: 12013380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Uznadze illusion reveals similar effects of relative size on perception and action.
    Uccelli S; Pisu V; Riggio L; Bruno N
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Apr; 237(4):953-965. PubMed ID: 30683958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual illusions modify object size estimates for prospective action judgements.
    Geers L; Pesenti M; Andres M
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Aug; 117():211-221. PubMed ID: 29883576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The dissociation between perception and action in the Ebbinghaus illusion: nonillusory effects of pictorial cues on grasp.
    Haffenden AM; Schiff KC; Goodale MA
    Curr Biol; 2001 Feb; 11(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11231152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual perception in domestic dogs: susceptibility to the Ebbinghaus-Titchener and Delboeuf illusions.
    Byosiere SE; Feng LC; Woodhead JK; Rutter NJ; Chouinard PA; Howell TJ; Bennett PC
    Anim Cogn; 2017 May; 20(3):435-448. PubMed ID: 28008543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visuomotor 'immunity' to perceptual illusion: a mismatch of attentional demands cannot explain the perception-action dissociation.
    Dewar MT; Carey DP
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(8):1501-8. PubMed ID: 16364378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attenuation of size illusion effect in dual-task conditions.
    Katsumata H
    Hum Mov Sci; 2019 Oct; 67():102497. PubMed ID: 31326743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.