These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12677327)

  • 21. How preparation to touch or grasp alters visual size perception.
    Vishton PM; Jones ED; Stevens JA
    Cogn Process; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 1():431-5. PubMed ID: 26245648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dissociating early and late visual processing via the Ebbinghaus illusion.
    Schmidt F; Weber A; Haberkamp A
    Vis Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 33():E016. PubMed ID: 28359350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Planning to reach for an object changes how the reacher perceives it.
    Vishton PM; Stephens NJ; Nelson LA; Morra SE; Brunick KL; Stevens JA
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Aug; 18(8):713-9. PubMed ID: 17680943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Planning versus online control: dynamic illusion effects in grasping?
    Franz VH
    Spat Vis; 2003; 16(3-4):211-23. PubMed ID: 12858948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Ebbinghaus illusion in contrast-defined and orientation-defined stimuli.
    Lavrenteva S; Murakami I
    Vision Res; 2018 Jul; 148():26-36. PubMed ID: 29758217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A tilted frame deceives the eye and the hand.
    Li W; Matin E; Bertz JW; Matin L
    J Vis; 2008 Dec; 8(16):18.1-16. PubMed ID: 19146284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ebbinghaus illusions with disc figures: effects of contextual size, separation, and lightness.
    Jaeger T; Klahs K; Newton D
    Percept Mot Skills; 2014 Jun; 118(3):805-17. PubMed ID: 25068746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Ebbinghaus illusion in the gray bamboo shark (Chiloscyllium griseum) in comparison to the teleost damselfish (Chromis chromis).
    Fuss T; Schluessel V
    Zoology (Jena); 2017 Aug; 123():16-29. PubMed ID: 28712674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Opposite effects on perception and action induced by the Ponzo illusion.
    Bartelt R; Darling WG
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Oct; 146(4):433-40. PubMed ID: 12355271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Grasping visual illusions: Consistent data and no dissociation.
    Franz VH; Gegenfurtner KR
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2008 Oct; 25(7):920-50. PubMed ID: 18629739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Illusions in action: consequences of inconsistent processing of spatial attributes.
    Smeets JB; Brenner E; de Grave DD; Cuijpers RH
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Nov; 147(2):135-44. PubMed ID: 12410328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of the Uznadze illusion is temporally dynamic in closed-loop but temporally constant in open-loop grasping.
    Uccelli S; Bruno N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Jun; 77(6):1238-1249. PubMed ID: 37784227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Looking at the Ebbinghaus illusion: differences in neurocomputational requirements, not gaze-mediated attention, explain a classic perception-action dissociation.
    Whitwell RL; Garach MA; Goodale MA; Sperandio I
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2023 Jan; 378(1869):20210459. PubMed ID: 36511402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of the "rod-and-frame" illusion on grip planning in a sequential object manipulation task.
    Crajé C; van der Kamp J; Steenbergen B
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Feb; 185(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 17909769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Modeling the time-dependent effect of the Ebbinghaus illusion on grasping.
    Smeets JB; Glover S; Brenner E
    Spat Vis; 2003; 16(3-4):311-24. PubMed ID: 12858954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Perceptual illusion and the real-time control of action.
    Westwood DA; Goodale MA
    Spat Vis; 2003; 16(3-4):243-54. PubMed ID: 12858950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Another look at the Müller-Lyer illusion: different gaze patterns in vision for action and perception.
    van Doorn H; van der Kamp J; de Wit M; Savelsbergh GJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):804-12. PubMed ID: 19118565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Vision: getting to grips with the Ebbinghaus illusion.
    Plodowski A; Jackson SR
    Curr Biol; 2001 Apr; 11(8):R304-6. PubMed ID: 11369219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Adaptation effects in grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Kopiske KK; Cesanek E; Campagnoli C; Domini F
    Vision Res; 2017 Jul; 136():21-31. PubMed ID: 28571701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Ebbinghaus illusion in a fish (Xenotoca eiseni).
    Sovrano VA; Albertazzi L; Rosa Salva O
    Anim Cogn; 2015 Mar; 18(2):533-42. PubMed ID: 25413845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.