These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12678580)

  • 1. Nulling the motion aftereffect with dynamic random-dot stimuli: limitations and implications.
    Castet E; Keeble DR; Verstraten FA
    J Vis; 2002; 2(4):302-11. PubMed ID: 12678580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reduction in the motion coherence threshold for the same direction as that perceived during adaptation.
    Hirahara M
    Vision Res; 2006 Dec; 46(28):4623-33. PubMed ID: 17092532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adaptation to second-order motion results in a motion aftereffect for directionally-ambiguous test stimuli.
    Ledgeway T
    Vision Res; 1994 Nov; 34(21):2879-89. PubMed ID: 7975322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modulation of motion aftereffect by surround motion and its dependence on stimulus size and eccentricity.
    Murakami I; Shimojo S
    Vision Res; 1995 Jul; 35(13):1835-44. PubMed ID: 7660590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tuning properties of radial phantom motion aftereffects.
    Price NS; Greenwood JA; Ibbotson MR
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(17):1971-9. PubMed ID: 15149830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Test stimulus characteristics determine the perceived speed of the dynamic motion aftereffect.
    Curran W; Benton CP
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(19):3284-90. PubMed ID: 16684553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contrast-reversing global-motion stimuli reveal local interactions between first- and second-order motion signals.
    Edwards M; Nishida S
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(16):1941-50. PubMed ID: 15145687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Motion versus position in the perception of head-centred movement.
    Freeman TC; Sumnall JH
    Perception; 2002; 31(5):603-15. PubMed ID: 12044100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adaptation state of the local-motion-pooling units determines the nature of the motion aftereffect to transparent motion.
    Edwards M; Cassanello CR; Kalia K
    Vision Res; 2012 Jul; 64():23-5. PubMed ID: 22595745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A gain-control model relating nulling results to the duration of dynamic motion aftereffects.
    van de Grind WA; Lankheet MJ; Tao R
    Vision Res; 2003 Jan; 43(2):117-33. PubMed ID: 12536135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Motion aftereffect with flickering test patterns reveals higher stages of motion processing.
    Nishida S; Sato T
    Vision Res; 1995 Feb; 35(4):477-90. PubMed ID: 7900288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Motion aftereffect with flickering test stimuli depends on adapting velocity.
    Ashida H; Osaka N
    Vision Res; 1995 Jul; 35(13):1825-33. PubMed ID: 7660589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The motion aftereffect of transparent motion: two temporal channels account for perceived direction.
    Alais D; Verstraten FA; Burr DC
    Vision Res; 2005 Feb; 45(4):403-12. PubMed ID: 15610746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhanced motion aftereffect for complex motions.
    Bex PJ; Metha AB; Makous W
    Vision Res; 1999 Jun; 39(13):2229-38. PubMed ID: 10343804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Strong influence of test patterns on the perception of motion aftereffect and position.
    Fang F; He S
    J Vis; 2004 Aug; 4(7):637-42. PubMed ID: 15330707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Movement aftereffect of bi-vectorial transparent motion.
    Verstraten FA; Fredericksen RE; van de Grind WA
    Vision Res; 1994 Feb; 34(3):349-58. PubMed ID: 8160370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A rotational stereoscopic 3-dimensional movement aftereffect.
    Webster WR; Panthradil JT; Conway DM
    Vision Res; 1998 Jun; 38(12):1745-52. PubMed ID: 9797953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Motion mechanisms with different spatiotemporal characteristics identified by an MAE technique with superimposed gratings.
    Shioiri S; Matsumiya K
    J Vis; 2009 May; 9(5):30.1-15. PubMed ID: 19757908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bivectorial transparent stimuli simultaneously adapt mechanisms at different levels of the motion pathway.
    von Grünau MW
    Vision Res; 2002 Mar; 42(5):577-87. PubMed ID: 11853775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surround-contingent motion aftereffect.
    Nakashima Y; Iijima T; Sugita Y
    Vision Res; 2015 Dec; 117():9-15. PubMed ID: 26459145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.