These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Visual perception studies and observer models in medical imaging. Burgess AE Semin Nucl Med; 2011 Nov; 41(6):419-36. PubMed ID: 21978445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Classification images: a tool to analyze visual strategies. Eckstein MP; Ahumada AJ J Vis; 2002; 2(1):1x. PubMed ID: 12678601 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Spatial profiles of local and nonlocal effects upon contrast detection/discrimination from classification images. Shimozaki SS; Eckstein MP; Abbey CK J Vis; 2005 Jan; 5(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 15831066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Noise reveals visual mechanisms of detection and discrimination. Solomon JA J Vis; 2002; 2(1):105-20. PubMed ID: 12678599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of two weighted integration models for the cueing task: linear and likelihood. Shimozaki SS; Eckstein MP; Abbey CK J Vis; 2003; 3(3):209-29. PubMed ID: 12723966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigating a space-variant weighted salience account of visual selection. Vincent BT; Troscianko T; Gilchrist ID Vision Res; 2007 Jun; 47(13):1809-20. PubMed ID: 17466357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Classification images and bubbles images in the generalized linear model. Murray RF J Vis; 2012 Jul; 12(7):2. PubMed ID: 22776846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perceptual learning through optimization of attentional weighting: human versus optimal Bayesian learner. Eckstein MP; Abbey CK; Pham BT; Shimozaki SS J Vis; 2004 Dec; 4(12):1006-19. PubMed ID: 15669908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimation receiver operating characteristic curve and ideal observers for combined detection/estimation tasks. Clarkson E J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2007 Dec; 24(12):B91-8. PubMed ID: 18059918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The footprints of visual attention during search with 100% valid and 100% invalid cues. Eckstein MP; Pham BT; Shimozaki SS Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1193-207. PubMed ID: 15066385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A bottom-up model of spatial attention predicts human error patterns in rapid scene recognition. Einhäuser W; Mundhenk TN; Baldi P; Koch C; Itti L J Vis; 2007 Jul; 7(10):6.1-13. PubMed ID: 17997675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A probabilistic model of visual working memory: Incorporating higher order regularities into working memory capacity estimates. Brady TF; Tenenbaum JB Psychol Rev; 2013 Jan; 120(1):85-109. PubMed ID: 23230888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]