These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12678788)

  • 21. Molecular similarity and diversity in chemoinformatics: from theory to applications.
    Maldonado AG; Doucet JP; Petitjean M; Fan BT
    Mol Divers; 2006 Feb; 10(1):39-79. PubMed ID: 16404528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Virtual compound screening in drug discovery.
    Stumpfe D; Ripphausen P; Bajorath J
    Future Med Chem; 2012 Apr; 4(5):593-602. PubMed ID: 22458679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Determination and mapping of activity-specific descriptor value ranges for the identification of active compounds.
    Eckert H; Bajorath J
    J Med Chem; 2006 Apr; 49(7):2284-93. PubMed ID: 16570925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Where are the GaPs? A rational approach to monomer acquisition and selection.
    Leach AR; Green DV; Hann MM; Judd DB; Good AC
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2000; 40(5):1262-9. PubMed ID: 11045822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Virtual darwinian drug design: QSAR inverse problem, virtual combinatorial chemistry, and computational screening.
    de Julian-Ortiz JV
    Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2001 May; 4(3):295-310. PubMed ID: 11375744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Automated pharmacophore identification for large chemical data sets.
    Chen X; Rusinko A; Tropsha A; Young SS
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 1999; 39(5):887-96. PubMed ID: 10529987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The future of virtual compound screening.
    Heikamp K; Bajorath J
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2013 Jan; 81(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 23253129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Chemical substructures in drug discovery.
    Merlot C; Domine D; Cleva C; Church DJ
    Drug Discov Today; 2003 Jul; 8(13):594-602. PubMed ID: 12850335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A similarity-based data-fusion approach to the visual characterization and comparison of compound databases.
    Medina-Franco JL; Maggiora GM; Giulianotti MA; Pinilla C; Houghten RA
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2007 Nov; 70(5):393-412. PubMed ID: 17927720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An overview of molecular fingerprint similarity search in virtual screening.
    Muegge I; Mukherjee P
    Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2016; 11(2):137-48. PubMed ID: 26558489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Performance of machine learning methods for ligand-based virtual screening.
    Plewczynski D; Spieser SA; Koch U
    Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2009 May; 12(4):358-68. PubMed ID: 19442065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Optimization of the MAD algorithm for virtual screening.
    Eckert H; Bajorath J
    Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 453():349-62. PubMed ID: 18712313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Impact of different software implementations on the performance of the Maxmin method for diverse subset selection.
    Schmuker M; Givehchi A; Schneider G
    Mol Divers; 2004; 8(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 15612646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Modeling Tanimoto Similarity Value Distributions and Predicting Search Results.
    Vogt M; Bajorath J
    Mol Inform; 2017 Jul; 36(7):. PubMed ID: 28032955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Pharmacophore features of potential drugs.
    Muegge I
    Chemistry; 2002 May; 8(9):1976-81. PubMed ID: 11981881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Emerging chemical patterns: a new methodology for molecular classification and compound selection.
    Auer J; Bajorath J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2502-14. PubMed ID: 17125191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Chemoinformatics - similarity and diversity in chemical libraries.
    Willett P
    Curr Opin Biotechnol; 2000 Feb; 11(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 10679335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of methods based on diversity and similarity for molecule selection and the analysis of drug discovery data.
    Lam RL; Welch WJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2004; 275():301-16. PubMed ID: 15141118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Efficient method for high-throughput virtual screening based on flexible docking: discovery of novel acetylcholinesterase inhibitors.
    Mizutani MY; Itai A
    J Med Chem; 2004 Sep; 47(20):4818-28. PubMed ID: 15369385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Pharmacophore modeling and three-dimensional database searching for drug design using catalyst.
    Kurogi Y; Güner OF
    Curr Med Chem; 2001 Jul; 8(9):1035-55. PubMed ID: 11472240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.