These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12679390)

  • 1. Left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes from gated blood-pool SPECT: comparison with planar gated blood-pool imaging and assessment of repeatability in patients with heart failure.
    Wright GA; Thackray S; Howey S; Cleland JG
    J Nucl Med; 2003 Apr; 44(4):494-8. PubMed ID: 12679390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gated blood pool SPECT for measurement of left ventricular volumes and left ventricular ejection fraction: comparison of 8 and 16 frame gated blood pool SPECT.
    Kim SJ; Kim IJ; Kim YS; Kim YK
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2005; 21(2-3):261-6. PubMed ID: 16015439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of gated blood pool SPECT and multi-detector row computed tomography for measurements of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction in patients with atypical chest pain: validation with radionuclide ventriculography.
    Kim IJ; Choo KS; Lee JS; Kim SJ; Kim JH; Kim YK; Kim DS; Cho HJ
    Cardiology; 2007; 107(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 16741353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction with cardiofocal collimators: Comparison between IQ-SPECT, planar equilibrium radionuclide angiography, and cardiac magnetic resonance.
    Pelletier-Galarneau M; Finnerty V; Tan S; Authier S; Gregoire J; Harel F
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2019 Dec; 26(6):1857-1864. PubMed ID: 29520572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gated blood-pool SPECT automated versus manual left ventricular function calculations.
    Slart RH; Poot L; Piers DA; van Veldhuisen DJ; Nichols K; Jager PL
    Nucl Med Commun; 2004 Jan; 25(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 15061268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Planar imaging versus gated blood-pool SPECT for the assessment of ventricular performance: a multicenter study.
    Groch MW; DePuey EG; Belzberg AC; Erwin WD; Kamran M; Barnett CA; Hendel RC; Spies SM; Ali A; Marshall RC
    J Nucl Med; 2001 Dec; 42(12):1773-9. PubMed ID: 11752072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical validation of the gated blood pool SPECT QBS processing software in congestive heart failure patients: correlation with MUGA, first-pass RNV and 2D-echocardiography.
    Hacker M; Hoyer X; Kupzyk S; La Fougere C; Kois J; Stempfle HU; Tiling R; Hahn K; Störk S
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2006; 22(3-4):407-16. PubMed ID: 16328851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative value of ECG-gated blood pool SPET and ECG-gated myocardial perfusion SPET in the assessment of global systolic left ventricular function.
    Daou D; Vilain D; Colin P; Lebtahi R; Fourme T; Coaguila C; Benada A; Idy-Peretti I; Slama M; Le Guludec D
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Jun; 30(6):859-67. PubMed ID: 12677300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrocardiographically gated blood-pool SPECT and left ventricular function: comparative value of 3 methods for ejection fraction and volume estimation.
    Daou D; Harel F; Helal BO; Fourme T; Colin P; Lebtahi R; Mariano-Goulart D; Faraggi M; Slama M; Le Guludec D
    J Nucl Med; 2001 Jul; 42(7):1043-9. PubMed ID: 11438625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Assessment of biventricular function using gated blood pool SPECT with QBS software: comparison with planar radionuclide ventriculography].
    Nakajo H; Kumita S; Cho K; Mizumura S; Toba M; Fukushima Y; Oshina T; Kumazaki T
    Kaku Igaku; 2002 Nov; 39(4):469-76. PubMed ID: 12607234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automatic quantification of left ventricular ejection fraction from gated blood pool SPECT.
    Van Kriekinge SD; Berman DS; Germano G
    J Nucl Cardiol; 1999; 6(5):498-506. PubMed ID: 10548145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development and application of normal limits for left ventricular ejection fraction and volume measurements from 99mTc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion gates SPECT.
    Rozanski A; Nichols K; Yao SS; Malholtra S; Cohen R; DePuey EG
    J Nucl Med; 2000 Sep; 41(9):1445-50. PubMed ID: 10994721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The value of a completely automatic ECG gated blood pool SPECT processing method for the estimation of global systolic left ventricular function.
    Daou D; Coaguila C; Benada A; Razzouk M; Haidar M; Colin P; Lebtahi R; Slama M; Guludec DL
    Nucl Med Commun; 2004 Mar; 25(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 15094446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gated blood-pool SPECT versus cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction.
    Harel F; Finnerty V; Grégoire J; Thibault B; Marcotte F; Ugolini P; Khairy P
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2010 Jun; 17(3):427-34. PubMed ID: 20151236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of OSEM and depth-dependent resolution recovery algorithms for the evaluation of global left ventricular function in 201Tl gated myocardial perfusion SPECT.
    Daou D; Pointurier I; Coaguila C; Vilain D; Benada AW; Lebtahi R; Fourme T; Slama M; Le Guludec D
    J Nucl Med; 2003 Feb; 44(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 12571203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of LVEF assessed by 2D echocardiography, gated blood pool SPECT, 99mTc tetrofosmin gated SPECT, and 18F-FDG gated PET with ERNV in patients with CAD and severe LV dysfunction.
    Raja S; Mittal BR; Santhosh S; Bhattacharya A; Rohit MK
    Nucl Med Commun; 2014 Nov; 35(11):1156-61. PubMed ID: 25144559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of radionuclide ventriculography assessed by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with abnormal left ventricles.
    Akinboboye O; Nichols K; Wang Y; Dim UR; Reichek N
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2005; 12(4):418-27. PubMed ID: 16084430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of right and left ventricular function by quantitative blood-pool SPECT (QBS): comparison with conventional methods and quantitative gated SPECT (QGS).
    Odagiri K; Wakabayashi Y; Tawarahara K; Kurata C; Urushida T; Katoh H; Satoh H; Hayashi H
    Ann Nucl Med; 2006 Oct; 20(8):519-26. PubMed ID: 17134018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of left and right ventricular ejection fraction and volumes from gated blood-pool SPECT in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy: comparison with cardiac MRI.
    Xie BQ; Tian YQ; Zhang J; Zhao SH; Yang MF; Guo F; Wang DY; Wei HX; Chu KW; He ZX
    J Nucl Med; 2012 Apr; 53(4):584-91. PubMed ID: 22393224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative values of gated blood-pool SPECT and CMR for ejection fraction and volume estimation.
    Sibille L; Bouallegue FB; Bourdon A; Micheau A; Vernhet-Kovacsik H; Mariano-Goulart D
    Nucl Med Commun; 2011 Feb; 32(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 21057340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.