1052 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12679504)
1. Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement.
Elwyn G; Edwards A; Wensing M; Hood K; Atwell C; Grol R
Qual Saf Health Care; 2003 Apr; 12(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 12679504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Shared decision making: the reliability of the OPTION scale in Italy.
Goss C; Fontanesi S; Mazzi MA; Del Piccolo L; Rimondini M; Elwyn G; Zimmermann C
Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Jun; 66(3):296-302. PubMed ID: 17433603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Psychometric properties of the German version of Observer OPTION
Kölker M; Topp J; Elwyn G; Härter M; Scholl I
BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Jan; 18(1):74. PubMed ID: 29386031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. OPTION(5) versus OPTION(12) instruments to appreciate the extent to which healthcare providers involve patients in decision-making.
Stubenrouch FE; Pieterse AH; Falkenberg R; Santema TK; Stiggelbout AM; van der Weijden T; Aarts JA; Ubbink DT
Patient Educ Couns; 2016 Jun; 99(6):1062-8. PubMed ID: 26776490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The OPTION scale: measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decision-making tasks.
Elwyn G; Hutchings H; Edwards A; Rapport F; Wensing M; Cheung WY; Grol R
Health Expect; 2005 Mar; 8(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 15713169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Psychometric properties of the simplified Chinese version of the observer OPTION
Chen Z; Bai X; Jin G; Tao X; Huang G; Zhao Y
BMC Fam Pract; 2020 Dec; 21(1):263. PubMed ID: 33280609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measuring triadic decision making in older patients with multiple chronic conditions: Observer OPTION
Pel-Littel RE; Buurman BM; van de Pol MH; Yilmaz NG; Tulner LR; Minkman MM; Scholte Op Reimer WJM; Elwyn G; van Weert JCM
Patient Educ Couns; 2019 Nov; 102(11):1969-1976. PubMed ID: 31279614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing patients' involvement in decision making during the nutritional consultation with a dietitian.
Vaillancourt H; Légaré F; Lapointe A; Deschênes SM; Desroches S
Health Expect; 2014 Aug; 17(4):545-54. PubMed ID: 22512818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Achieving involvement: process outcomes from a cluster randomized trial of shared decision making skill development and use of risk communication aids in general practice.
Elwyn G; Edwards A; Hood K; Robling M; Atwell C; Russell I; Wensing M; Grol R;
Fam Pract; 2004 Aug; 21(4):337-46. PubMed ID: 15249520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The psychometric properties of Observer OPTION(5), an observer measure of shared decision making.
Barr PJ; O'Malley AJ; Tsulukidze M; Gionfriddo MR; Montori V; Elwyn G
Patient Educ Couns; 2015 Aug; 98(8):970-6. PubMed ID: 25956069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Trying to optimise the German version of the OPTION scale regarding the dyadic aspect of shared decision making.
Keller H; Hirsch O; Müller-Engelmann M; Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M; Krones T; Donner-Banzhoff N
Methods Inf Med; 2013; 52(6):514-21. PubMed ID: 23907324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing the ability of OPTION(12) and OPTION(5) to assess shared decision-making in genetic counselling.
Vortel MA; Adam S; Port-Thompson AV; Friedman JM; Grande SW; Birch PH
Patient Educ Couns; 2016 Oct; 99(10):1717-23. PubMed ID: 27085518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Involve the patient and pass the MRCGP: investigating shared decision making in a consulting skills examination using a validated instrument.
Siriwardena AN; Edwards AG; Campion P; Freeman A; Elwyn G
Br J Gen Pract; 2006 Nov; 56(532):857-62. PubMed ID: 17132353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A reliability study of an instrument for measuring general practitioner consultation skills: the LIV-MAAS scale.
Enzer I; Robinson J; Pearson M; Barton S; Walley T
Int J Qual Health Care; 2003 Oct; 15(5):407-12. PubMed ID: 14527984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How much do family physicians involve pregnant women in decisions about prenatal screening for Down syndrome?
Gagnon S; Labrecque M; Njoya M; Rousseau F; St-Jacques S; Légaré F
Prenat Diagn; 2010 Feb; 30(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 20013876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability and validity of the German version of the OPTION scale.
Hirsch O; Keller H; Müller-Engelmann M; Gutenbrunner MH; Krones T; Donner-Banzhoff N
Health Expect; 2012 Dec; 15(4):379-88. PubMed ID: 21521432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measuring shared decision making in the consultation: a comparison of the OPTION and Informed Decision Making instruments.
Weiss MC; Peters TJ
Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Jan; 70(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 17942270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The assessment of patient involvement across consultation. The Italian version of the OPTION scale].
Goss C; Fontanesi S; Mazzi MA; Del Piccolo L; Rimondini M
Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc; 2007; 16(4):339-49. PubMed ID: 18333430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing the nine-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire to the OPTION Scale - an attempt to establish convergent validity.
Scholl I; Kriston L; Dirmaier J; Härter M
Health Expect; 2015 Feb; 18(1):137-50. PubMed ID: 23176071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Shared decision making and antibiotic benefit-harm conversations: an observational study of consultations between general practitioners and patients with acute respiratory infections.
Bakhit M; Del Mar C; Gibson E; Hoffmann T
BMC Fam Pract; 2018 Oct; 19(1):165. PubMed ID: 30292242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
