These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12679874)

  • 1. Irregular rotation and shift of computer-assisted femoral stem implantation in THA--an experimental study.
    Pellengahr C; Huber A; Maier M; Müller PE; Zysk S; Troullier H; Dürr HR; Lienemann A; Jansson V; Refior HJ
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2003 Apr; 123(2-3):60-3. PubMed ID: 12679874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Rotational alignment of femoral component with computed-assisted surgery (CAS) during total knee arthroplasty].
    Michaut M; Beaufils P; Galaud B; Abadie P; Boisrenoult P; Fallet L
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Oct; 94(6):580-4. PubMed ID: 18929753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The dimensional accuracy for preparation of the femoral cavity in HIP arthroplasty. A comparison between manual- and robot-assisted implantation of hip endoprosthesis stems in cadaver femurs.
    Prymka M; Wu L; Hahne HJ; Koebke J; Hassenpflug J
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2006 Jan; 126(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 16341537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The primary stability between manual and robot assisted implantation of hip prostheses: A biomechanical study on synthetic femurs].
    Decking J; Gerber A; Kränzlein J; Meurer A; Böhm B; Plitz W
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2004; 142(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 15250003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CT-based and fluoroscopy-based navigation for cup implantation in total hip arthroplasty (THA).
    Hube R; Birke A; Hein W; Klima S
    Surg Technol Int; 2003; 11():275-80. PubMed ID: 12931311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between hand rasping and robotic milling for stem implantation in cementless total hip arthroplasty.
    Nishihara S; Sugano N; Nishii T; Miki H; Nakamura N; Yoshikawa H
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Oct; 21(7):957-66. PubMed ID: 17027537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Primary rotatory stability of hip endoprostheses stems after manual and robot assisted implantation].
    Prymka M; Vogiatzis M; Hassenpflug J
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2004; 142(3):303-8. PubMed ID: 15250002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Computer-assisted, robot-assisted hip prosthesis--standard procedure or specialty indication?].
    Geiger C; Ostermann PA; Ekkernkamp A
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2001 Apr; 95(3):165-71. PubMed ID: 11398618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Computer-assisted total-knee arthroplasty. Comparison of two successive systems. Learning curve].
    Bové JC
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 May; 94(3):252-60. PubMed ID: 18456060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computed-tomography-based computer preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty.
    Sugano N; Ohzono K; Nishii T; Haraguchi K; Sakai T; Ochi T
    Comput Aided Surg; 1998; 3(6):320-4. PubMed ID: 10379982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of a computer navigation system and a CT method for determination of the orientation of implanted acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaver study.
    Lin F; Lim D; Wixson RL; Milos S; Hendrix RW; Makhsous M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Oct; 23(8):1004-11. PubMed ID: 18541352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer-assisted total hip navigation.
    Wixson RL
    Instr Course Lect; 2008; 57():707-20. PubMed ID: 18399618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robot- and computer-assisted craniotomy: resection planning, implant modelling and robot safety.
    Bast P; Popovic A; Wu T; Heger S; Engelhardt M; Lauer W; Radermacher K; Schmieder K
    Int J Med Robot; 2006 Jun; 2(2):168-78. PubMed ID: 17520628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Precision surgery.
    Dorr LD; Deshmane P
    Orthopedics; 2009 Sep; 32(9):. PubMed ID: 19751022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determination of optimal non-invasive patient fixation methods for use in robotic hip replacement surgery--an in vitro study.
    Schulz AP; Tarabolsi M; Faber A; Meiners J; Kammal M; Mantwill F
    Int J Med Robot; 2007 Jun; 3(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 17619243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensitivity of the primary stability of a cementless hip stem to its position and orientation.
    Reggiani B; Cristofolini L; Taddei F; Viceconti M
    Artif Organs; 2008 Jul; 32(7):555-60. PubMed ID: 18638310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
    Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Ten-year experience with the Aldinger custom-made total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of the results].
    Masár J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Jun; 74(3):175-81. PubMed ID: 17623605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital templating in total hip arthroplasty with the Mayo stem.
    Wedemeyer C; Quitmann H; Xu J; Heep H; von Knoch M; Saxler G
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Oct; 128(10):1023-9. PubMed ID: 17994244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Results of total hip replacement using the Robodoc surgical assistant system: clinical outcome and evaluation of complications for 97 procedures.
    Schulz AP; Seide K; Queitsch C; von Haugwitz A; Meiners J; Kienast B; Tarabolsi M; Kammal M; Jürgens C
    Int J Med Robot; 2007 Dec; 3(4):301-6. PubMed ID: 18000945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.