These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12679874)

  • 21. The European school of total hip arthroplasty and 35 years of total hip arthroplasty in the Czech Republic.
    Cech O; Dzupa V
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2005; 72(1):57-76. PubMed ID: 15860155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Robot-assisted placement of craniofacial implants.
    Klein M; Hein A; Lueth T; Bier J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):712-8. PubMed ID: 14579960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of manual rasping and robotic milling for short metaphyseal-fitting stem implantation in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaveric study.
    Lim SJ; Kim SM; Lim BH; Moon YW; Park YS
    Comput Aided Surg; 2013; 18(1-2):33-40. PubMed ID: 23253159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. C-arm based navigation in total hip arthroplasty-background and clinical experience.
    Grützner PA; Zheng G; Langlotz U; von Recum J; Nolte LP; Wentzensen A; Widmer KH; Wendl K
    Injury; 2004 Jun; 35 Suppl 1():S-A90-5. PubMed ID: 15183709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Experimental validation of a pinless femoral reference array for computer-assisted hip arthroplasty.
    Renkawitz T; Wegner M; Gneiting S; Haimerl M; Sendtner E; Kalteis T; Grifka J
    J Orthop Res; 2010 May; 28(5):583-8. PubMed ID: 19950361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Primary stability of a robodoc implanted anatomical stem versus manual implantation.
    Nogler M; Polikeit A; Wimmer C; Brückner A; Ferguson SJ; Krismer M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Feb; 19(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 14967574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Bone morphing system for rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty].
    Wu H; van Driessche S; Goutallier D
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Jan; 22(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 18361228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accuracy and repeatability of cementless total hip replacement surgery in patients with deformed anatomies.
    Lattanzi R; Grazi E; Testi D; Viceconti M; Cappello A; Toni A
    Med Inform Internet Med; 2003 Mar; 28(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 12851057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Computer-assisted total hip arthroplasty: coding the next generation of navigation systems for orthopedic surgery.
    Renkawitz T; Tingart M; Grifka J; Sendtner E; Kalteis T
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2009 Sep; 6(5):507-14. PubMed ID: 19751123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The figure-of-four axis as a reference to determine stem rotation in hip arthroplasty. What does it really measure? A cadaver study.
    Mayr E; Thaler M; Williams A; Moctezuma de La Barrera J; Krismer M; Nogler M
    Acta Orthop; 2007 Aug; 78(4):458-62. PubMed ID: 17965998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Early aseptic loosening of the CF 30 femoral stem].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Feb; 74(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 17331456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Image-based hip navigation.
    Wentzensen A; Zheng G; Vock B; Langlotz U; Korber J; Nolte LP; Grützner PA
    Int Orthop; 2003; 27 Suppl 1():S43-6. PubMed ID: 14565684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Computer-assisted surgery for hip endoprosthesis].
    Börner M; Lahmer A; Wiesel U
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 1999 Jun; 93(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 10432568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [ROBODOC--a path into the future of hip endoprosthetics or an investment error?].
    Birke A; Reichel H; Hein W; Schietsch U; Hube R; Bernstein A; Krüger T
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2000; 138(5):395-401. PubMed ID: 11084738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The dimensional accuracy of preparation of femoral cavity in cementless total hip arthroplasty.
    Wu LD; Hahne HJ; Hassenpflug J
    J Zhejiang Univ Sci; 2004 Oct; 5(10):1270-8. PubMed ID: 15362200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinical accuracy evaluation of femoral canal preparation using the ROBODOC system.
    Nishihara S; Sugano N; Nishii T; Tanaka H; Nakamura N; Yoshikawa H; Ochi T
    J Orthop Sci; 2004; 9(5):452-61. PubMed ID: 15449120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Robotic assistance in orthopaedic surgery. A proof of principle using distal femoral arthroplasty.
    Matsen FA; Garbini JL; Sidles JA; Pratt B; Baumgarten D; Kaiura R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1993 Nov; (296):178-86. PubMed ID: 8222422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Using robots in hip prosthesis implantation. Precision with the wrong concept?].
    Burgkart R; Mittelmeier W; Steinhauser E; Gradinger R
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2001 Apr; 143(15):36-7. PubMed ID: 11349316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Is determination of the hip rotation center during computer-assisted surgery influenced by the pinless femoral sensor attachment method? An in vitro preliminary study comparing osseous pin fixation.
    de Thomasson E; Gouzy S; Cloerec F; Geais L
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 May; 102(3):375-8. PubMed ID: 26969205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Robotics-assisted implantation of femoral components in hip endoprosthetics--an experimental study].
    Jerosch J; Finken N; Filler T; Peuker E; Rahgozar M; Lahmer A; Witzel U
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1999; 137(4):Oa7-12. PubMed ID: 11051009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.