These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12680374)

  • 1. Regulating reproductive technologies: panacea or paper tiger?
    Daar JF
    Houst Law Rev; 1997; 34(3):609-64. PubMed ID: 12680374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ethical dilemmas in reproductive medicine.
    Paine SJ; Moore PK; Hill DL
    Whittier Law Rev; 1996; 18(1):51-66. PubMed ID: 16273701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assisted reproductive technologies: contracts, consents, and controversies.
    Elster NR
    Am J Fam Law; 2005; 18(4):193-9. PubMed ID: 17153245
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The application of traditional criminal law to misappropriation of gametic materials.
    Ayala K
    Am J Crim Law; 1997; 24(3):503-39. PubMed ID: 16086480
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Growing pains: disputes surrounding human reproductive interests stretch the boundaries of traditional legal concepts.
    Triber GA
    Seton Hall Legis J; 1998; 23(1):103-40. PubMed ID: 12755156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A primer on posthumous conception and related issues of assisted reproduction.
    Brenwald ML; Redeker K
    Washburn Law J; 1999; 38(2):599-654. PubMed ID: 12774811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The legal status of embryos and implications for reproductive technologies and biotechnology research.
    Bowens KK
    J Biolaw Bus; 2006; 9(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 17111524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reproductive capacity: what does the embryo get?
    Stephens KU
    South Univ Law Rev; 1997; 24(2):263-91. PubMed ID: 16528857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parpalaix v. CECOS: Protecting Intent in Reproductive Technology.
    Katz GA
    Harv J Law Technol; 1998; 11(3):683-98. PubMed ID: 12731553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Regulating consent to organ and embryo donation.
    Naffine N; Richards B
    J Bioeth Inq; 2012 Mar; 9(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 23180200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fertility clinics in Chile: a tale of a doctor fleeing U.S. law.
    Sims C
    N Y Times Web; 1996 Apr; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11647127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assisted reproductive technology law. Obtaining informed consent for the commercial cryopreservation of embryos.
    Vukadinovich DM
    J Leg Med; 2000 Mar; 21(1):67-78. PubMed ID: 10730012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sperm, egg, and a petri dish. Unveiling the underlying property issues surrounding cryopreserved embryos.
    Langley LS; Blackston JW
    J Leg Med; 2006 Jun; 27(2):167-206. PubMed ID: 16728352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Donate a definition.
    Herder M
    Health Law Rev; 2002; 11(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 15739316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The organ trail: express versus presumed consent as paths to blaze in solving a critical shortage.
    Morris ED
    Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 2003 Nov; (295):9-34. PubMed ID: 14719372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reproductive technologies and United States law.
    Vetri D
    Int Comp Law Q; 1988 Jul; 37():505-34. PubMed ID: 16032817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In re Marriage of Buzzanca: charting a new destiny.
    O'Hara MD; Vorzimer AW
    West State Univ Law Rev; 1998-1999; 26():25-45. PubMed ID: 12625315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clones, controversy, and criminal law: a comment on the proposal for legislation governing assisted human reproduction.
    Caulfield T
    Alta Law Rev; 2001 Sep; 39(2):335-45. PubMed ID: 12611408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Examining disputes over ownership rights to frozen embryos: will prior consent documents survive if challenged by state law and/or constitutional principles?
    Sheinbach DM
    Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1999; 48(3):989-1027. PubMed ID: 12611403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assisted reproduction: a process ripe for regulation? A conference of the National Advisory Board on Ethics in Reproduction.
    Jonsen AR; Macklin R; White GB
    Womens Health Issues; 1996; 6(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 8672893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.