These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12680381)
21. Congress ignores the parameters of the health exception. Judicial responses to congressional evidence and partial-birth abortion in Thewake of Stenberg v. Carhart. Bailey BJ J Leg Med; 2006 Mar; 27(1):71-85. PubMed ID: 16510366 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Possible ban on abortion technique leaves doctors uneasy. Duenwald M N Y Times Web; 2003 Apr; ():F5, F8. PubMed ID: 12812228 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. An inside look at partial birth abortion. Lowe LR Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1998-1999; 24():327-57. PubMed ID: 16180289 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Abortion rights after South Dakota. McDonagh E Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. X marks the spot while Casey strikes out: two controversial abortion decisions. Zenkich S Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1993; 23(3):1001-40. PubMed ID: 16437786 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The federal ban on so-called "partial-birth abortion" is a dangerous intrusion into medical practice. Blumenthal PD MedGenMed; 2003 Jun; 5(2):37. PubMed ID: 14603136 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. When does a fetus become a child in need of an advocate? Focusing on fetal pain. McDonald TB Child Leg Rights J; 1997; 17(2):12-9. PubMed ID: 12159907 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. After Ayotte: the need to defend abortion rights with renewed "purpose.". Harv Law Rev; 2006 Jun; 119(8):2552-73. PubMed ID: 16827220 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Children not meant to be: protecting the interests of the child when abortion results in live birth. Casagrande KM Quinnipiac Health Law J; 2002; 6(1):19-55. PubMed ID: 16180297 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The Court and abortion: worse than you think. Dworkin R New York Rev Books; 2007 May; 54(9):20-1. PubMed ID: 17517997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Justices reaffirm abortion access for emergencies. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 2006 Jan; ():A1, A18. PubMed ID: 16429624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Hope Clinic v. Ryan. United States. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit Wests Fed Rep; 2001; 249():603-6. PubMed ID: 16482667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Jon O. Newman and the abortion decisions: a remarkable first year. Hurwitz AD NY Law Sch Law Rev; 2002-2003; 46(1-2):231-47. PubMed ID: 16493839 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. U.S. Court in New York rejects partial-birth abortion ban. Preston J N Y Times Web; 2004 Aug; ():A12. PubMed ID: 15540363 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Minors as medical decision makers: the pretextual reasoning of the court in the abortion cases. Ehrlich JS Mich J Gend Law; 2000; 7(1):65-106. PubMed ID: 12715809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Constitutional law: state abortion regulations held constitutional. Ritchie JA Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1978 R I. Survey; 12(3):538-46. PubMed ID: 11663902 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Parental notification of abortion and minors' rights under the Montana constitution. Hayhurst MB Mont Law Rev; 1997; 58(2):565-98. PubMed ID: 16180294 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Congressional control of federal court jurisdiction: the case study of abortion. Greenwood JS S C Law Rev; 2003; 54(4):1069-112. PubMed ID: 16493841 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Preserving the right to choose: a minor's right to confidential reproductive health care. Bertuglia J Womens Rights Law Report; 2001; 23(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 12774775 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]