These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12680390)

  • 1. Is mama a criminal? An analysis of potential criminal liability of HIV-infected pregnant women in the context of mandated drug therapy.
    Ayers L
    Drake Law Rev; 2002; 50(2):293-314. PubMed ID: 12680390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mandatory HIV testing and treating of child-bearing women: an unnatural, illegal, and unsound approach.
    McGovern TM
    Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1997; 28(3):469-99. PubMed ID: 16437777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. At what cost?: an argument against mandatory AZT treatment of HIV-positive pregnant women.
    Halem SC
    Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1997; 32(2):492-528. PubMed ID: 16200699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The law and ACTG protocol 076: do the slings and arrows of mandatory HIV testing penetrate a woman's right to privacy.
    Goldring DS
    Linc Law Rev; 1999; 25/26():1-23. PubMed ID: 15929237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ryan White care amendments: mandatory HIV testing of newborns and a woman's right to privacy.
    McCabe CH
    DePaul J Health Care Law; 1996; 1(2):373-93. PubMed ID: 15282882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perinatal HIV transmission: a children's human rights perspective.
    Hodge JG; Parini MJ
    Child Leg Rights J; 1998; 18(2):6-19. PubMed ID: 16437776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Legal issues: drug testing of postpartum women and newborns as the basis for civil and criminal proceedings.
    Moss KL
    Clgh Rev; 1990 Mar; 23(11):1406-14. PubMed ID: 11659232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fetal interests vs. maternal rights: is the state going too far?
    Trindel RM
    Akron Law Rev; 1991; 24(3-4):743-62. PubMed ID: 16273672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vertical HIV transmission should be excluded from criminal prosecution.
    Csete J; Pearshouse R; Symington A
    Reprod Health Matters; 2009 Nov; 17(34):154-62. PubMed ID: 19962649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Crack babies and the Constitution: ruminations about addicted pregnant women after Ferguson v. City of Charleston.
    Marrus E
    Villanova Law Rev; 2002; 47(2):299-340. PubMed ID: 12680368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness of interventions to reduce vertical HIV transmission from pregnant women who have not received prenatal care.
    Mrus JM; Tsevat J
    Med Decis Making; 2004; 24(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 15005952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genotypic resistance tests for the management of the HIV-infected pregnant woman.
    Bassetti D; Cargnel A
    Scand J Infect Dis Suppl; 2003; 106():70-4. PubMed ID: 15000589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The case against mandatory HIV testing of pregnant women: the legal and public policy implications.
    McMillion E
    Duke J Gend Law Policy; 1998; 5(1):227-44. PubMed ID: 11979602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maternal 12-month response to antiretroviral therapy following prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV type 1, Ivory Coast, 2003-2006.
    Coffie PA; Ekouevi DK; Chaix ML; Tonwe-Gold B; Clarisse AB; Becquet R; Viho I; N'dri-Yoman T; Leroy V; Abrams EJ; Rouzioux C; Dabis F
    Clin Infect Dis; 2008 Feb; 46(4):611-21. PubMed ID: 18197758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. HIV infection and zidovudine use in childbearing women.
    Sia J; Paul S; Martin RM; Cross H
    Pediatrics; 2004 Dec; 114(6):e707-12. PubMed ID: 15545619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. HIV testing and prophylaxis to prevent mother-to-child transmission in the United States.
    American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Pediatric AIDS
    Pediatrics; 2008 Nov; 122(5):1127-34. PubMed ID: 18977995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prenatal v. parental rights: what a difference an "a" makes.
    Gallagher A
    St Marys Law J; 1989; 21(2):301-24. PubMed ID: 16100799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Women and HIV: a gender-based analysis of a disease and its legal regulation.
    Bobinski MA
    Tex J Women Law; 1994; 3(1):7-56. PubMed ID: 12645605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The ethics of mandatory HIV testing of all pregnant women.
    Clark PA
    Linacre Q; 2003 Feb; 70(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 14587483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Senate favors promoting voluntary tests for pregnant women.
    AIDS Policy Law; 1995 Aug; 10(15):12. PubMed ID: 11362736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.