BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12680492)

  • 21. Multilevel qualification of a large set of blood gas analyzers: Which performance goals?
    Kuster N; Bargnoux AS; Badiou S; Dupuy AM; Piéroni L; Cristol JP
    Clin Biochem; 2019 Dec; 74():47-53. PubMed ID: 31533025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical evaluation of a new in-line continuous blood gas monitor.
    Southworth R; Sutton R; Mize S; Stammers AH; Fristoe LW; Cook D; Hostetler D; Richenbacher WE
    J Extra Corpor Technol; 1998 Dec; 30(4):166-70. PubMed ID: 10537576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Analytical and pre-analytical performance characteristics of a novel cartridge-type blood gas analyzer for point-of-care and laboratory testing.
    Oyaert M; Van Maerken T; Bridts S; Van Loon S; Laverge H; Stove V
    Clin Biochem; 2018 Mar; 53():116-126. PubMed ID: 29339078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Analytical reliability of the results of a pH and blood gas study using automatic analyzers].
    Dimitrova S; Tsachev K; Dochev D; Kuzmov I
    Vutr Boles; 1984; 23(4):91-9. PubMed ID: 6506665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of a hand-held blood gas analyzer for rapid determination of blood gases, electrolytes and metabolites in intensive care setting.
    Luukkonen AA; Lehto TM; Hedberg PS; Vaskivuo TE
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2016 Apr; 54(4):585-94. PubMed ID: 26457784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical evaluation of the ABL-77 for point-of-care analysis in the cardiovascular operating room.
    Prichard JS; French JS; Alvar N
    J Extra Corpor Technol; 2006 Jun; 38(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 16921685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of blood gas, electrolyte and metabolite results measured with two different blood gas analyzers and a core laboratory analyzer.
    Uyanik M; Sertoglu E; Kayadibi H; Tapan S; Serdar MA; Bilgi C; Kurt I
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2015 Apr; 75(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 25431133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accuracy and precision of the i-STAT portable clinical analyzer: an analytical point of view.
    Pidetcha P; Ornvichian S; Chalachiva S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2000 Apr; 83(4):445-50. PubMed ID: 10808706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Interchangeability of blood gas, electrolyte and metabolite results measured with point-of-care, blood gas and core laboratory analyzers.
    Leino A; Kurvinen K
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 Jul; 49(7):1187-91. PubMed ID: 21504373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Saline PCO2 is an important source of error in the assessment of gastric intramucosal pH.
    Takala J; Parviainen I; Siloaho M; Ruokonen E; Hämäläinen E
    Crit Care Med; 1994 Nov; 22(11):1877-9. PubMed ID: 7956295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Analytical performance evaluation of four cartridge-type blood gas analyzers.
    De Koninck AS; De Decker K; Van Bocxlaer J; Meeus P; Van Hoovels L
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2012 Feb; 50(6):1083-91. PubMed ID: 22706251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of i-STAT portable clinical analyzer in a neonatal and pediatric intensive care unit.
    Murthy JN; Hicks JM; Soldin SJ
    Clin Biochem; 1997 Jul; 30(5):385-9. PubMed ID: 9253514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. How reliable are electrolyte and metabolite results measured by a blood gas analyzer in the ED?
    Uysal E; Acar YA; Kutur A; Cevik E; Salman N; Tezel O
    Am J Emerg Med; 2016 Mar; 34(3):419-24. PubMed ID: 26658635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Performance characteristics and interanalyzer variability of PO2 measurements using tonometered human blood.
    Scuderi PE; MacGregor DA; Bowton DL; Harris LC; Anderson R; James RL
    Am Rev Respir Dis; 1993 Jun; 147(6 Pt 1):1354-9. PubMed ID: 8503545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of the EPOC and i-STAT analysers for canine blood gas and electrolyte analysis.
    West E; Bardell D; Senior JM
    J Small Anim Pract; 2014 Mar; 55(3):139-44. PubMed ID: 24428140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Pertinence of simultaneous measurements of pO2 and sO2 on ABL 510].
    Gouget B; Manene D; Andrimahatratra R; Bogard M; Gourmelin Y
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1992; 50(4):247-50. PubMed ID: 1456503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Quality control in acid-base and gas analysis of the blood].
    Dimitrova S; Labreva L
    Vutr Boles; 1981; 20(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 7245731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The measure of treatment agreement between portable and laboratory blood gas measurements in guiding protocol-driven ventilator management.
    Thomas FO; Hoffman TL; Handrahan DL; Crapo RO; Snow G
    J Trauma; 2009 Aug; 67(2):303-13; discussion 313-4. PubMed ID: 19667883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Comparative study of six blood gas analysers].
    Daurès MF; Combescure C; Cristol JP
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2007; 65(5):505-18. PubMed ID: 17913669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A two-center evaluation of the blood gas immediate response mobile analyzer (IRMA).
    Ceriotti F; Del BL; Bonini P; Germagnoli L; Ferrero CA; Pezzo M; Marocchi A
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2002 Feb; 40(2):182-91. PubMed ID: 11939493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.