127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12681259)
1. NICE system...shame about the side-effects.
McVie G
Lancet Oncol; 2003 Apr; 4(4):203. PubMed ID: 12681259
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. ABPI call for NICE guidance to be made mandatory.
Tiner R
Lancet Oncol; 2003 Apr; 4(4):203-4. PubMed ID: 12681260
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. NICE Methodology for Technology Appraisals: cutting edge or tried and trusted?
Longworth L; Longson C
Pharmacoeconomics; 2008; 26(9):729-32. PubMed ID: 18767893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The HSJ interview: Andrew Dillon. The NICE guy. Interview by Lyn Whitfield.
Dillon A
Health Serv J; 2003 Jun; 113(5858):20-1. PubMed ID: 12808869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Implications of the appraisal function of the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE).
Buxton M
Value Health; 2001; 4(3):212-6. PubMed ID: 11705183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pharmaceutical regulation: the early experience of the NHS National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) appraisal process--where are we headed?
Taylor R
Value Health; 2001; 4(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 11704972
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The decade of NICE.
Rawlins MD
Lancet; 2009 Jul; 374(9686):351-2. PubMed ID: 19394075
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The cancer technology appraisal programme of the UK's National Institute for Clinical Excellence.
Littlejohns P; Barnett D; Longson C;
Lancet Oncol; 2003 Apr; 4(4):242-50. PubMed ID: 12681268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On being NICE in the UK: guidelines for technology appraisal for the NHS in England and Wales.
Birch S; Gafni A
Health Econ; 2002 Apr; 11(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 11921316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Evidence-informed evidence-making.
Chalkidou K; Walley T; Culyer A; Littlejohns P; Hoy A
J Health Serv Res Policy; 2008 Jul; 13(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 18573766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality, innovation, and value for money: NICE and the British National Health Service.
Pearson SD; Rawlins MD
JAMA; 2005 Nov; 294(20):2618-22. PubMed ID: 16304076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. NICE reports. NICE to see you...
Bosanquet N
Health Serv J; 2003 Jun; 113(5860):30-1. PubMed ID: 12852103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Searching for a threshold - Not so NICE..
Mooney G; Coast J; Jan S; ; Ryan M; Wiseman V
J Health Serv Res Policy; 2007 Jul; 12(3):190; author reply 190-1. PubMed ID: 17716427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. NICE puts clinical governance on the agenda.
Shuttleworth A
Prof Nurse; 1999 Jun; 14(9):605. PubMed ID: 10427294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). HTA rhyme and reason?
Taylor R
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2002; 18(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 12053416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nasty or nice? A perspective on the use of health technology assessment in the United Kingdom.
Drummond M; Sorenson C
Value Health; 2009 Jun; 12 Suppl 2():S8-13. PubMed ID: 19523188
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE): Is economic appraisal working?
Towse A; Pritchard C
Pharmacoeconomics; 2002; 20 Suppl 3():95-105. PubMed ID: 12457430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A furore too far: the widespread disquiet undermining NICE.
Carlisle D
Health Serv J; 2006 Jun; 116(6011):14-5. PubMed ID: 16827515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Making decisions on technology availability in the British National Health Service--why we need reliable models.
Akehurst RL
Value Health; 2003; 6(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 12535232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A NICE approach.
Harrison S
Nurs Stand; 2006 Sep 6-12; 20(52):12-3. PubMed ID: 16989334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
