These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12681346)

  • 21. Conflict and surrender during sentence processing: an ERP study of syntax-semantics interaction.
    Kim A; Sikos L
    Brain Lang; 2011 Jul; 118(1-2):15-22. PubMed ID: 21481924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Is the P600/SPS affected by the richness of semantic content? A linguistic ERP study in Swedish.
    Ericsson E; Olofsson JK; Nordin S; Rudolfsson T; Sandström G
    Scand J Psychol; 2008 Feb; 49(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 18190397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Syntactic and semantic processing of passive BEI sentences in Mandarin Chinese: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Zeng T; Li Y; Wu M
    Neuroreport; 2020 Sep; 31(13):979-984. PubMed ID: 32694312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. No semantic illusions in the "Semantic P600" phenomenon: ERP evidence from Mandarin Chinese.
    Chow WY; Phillips C
    Brain Res; 2013 Apr; 1506():76-93. PubMed ID: 23422676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Electrophysiological correlates of complement coercion.
    Kuperberg GR; Choi A; Cohn N; Paczynski M; Jackendoff R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Dec; 22(12):2685-701. PubMed ID: 19702471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. When syntax meets semantics.
    Gunter TC; Stowe LA; Mulder G
    Psychophysiology; 1997 Nov; 34(6):660-76. PubMed ID: 9401421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: evidence of the application of verb information during parsing.
    Osterhout L; Holcomb PJ; Swinney DA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1994 Jul; 20(4):786-803. PubMed ID: 8064247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Monitoring in language perception: evidence from ERPs in a picture-sentence matching task.
    Vissers CT; Kolk HH; van de Meerendonk N; Chwilla DJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Mar; 46(4):967-82. PubMed ID: 18199460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The influence of emotional words on sentence processing: electrophysiological and behavioral evidence.
    Martín-Loeches M; Fernández A; Schacht A; Sommer W; Casado P; Jiménez-Ortega L; Fondevila S
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Dec; 50(14):3262-72. PubMed ID: 22982604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Language ERPs reflect learning through prediction error propagation.
    Fitz H; Chang F
    Cogn Psychol; 2019 Jun; 111():15-52. PubMed ID: 30921626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The "semantic P600" in second language processing: When syntax conflicts with semantics.
    Zheng X; Lemhöfer K
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Apr; 127():131-147. PubMed ID: 30790583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Multiple semantic processes at different levels of syntactic hierarchy: does the higher-level process proceed in face of a lower-level failure?
    Jiang X; Zhou X
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jul; 50(8):1918-28. PubMed ID: 22561886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Language related brain potentials in patients with cortical and subcortical left hemisphere lesions.
    Friederici AD; von Cramon DY; Kotz SA
    Brain; 1999 Jun; 122 ( Pt 6)():1033-47. PubMed ID: 10356057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cross-linguistic variation in the neurophysiological response to semantic processing: evidence from anomalies at the borderline of awareness.
    Tune S; Schlesewsky M; Small SL; Sanford AJ; Bohan J; Sassenhagen J; Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Apr; 56():147-66. PubMed ID: 24447768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Brain potentials and syntactic violations revisited: no evidence for specificity of the syntactic positive shift.
    Münte TF; Heinze HJ; Matzke M; Wieringa BM; Johannes S
    Neuropsychologia; 1998 Mar; 36(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 9622187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Semantic reversal anomalies under the microscope: Task and modality influences on language-associated event-related potentials.
    Kyriaki L; Schlesewsky M; Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I
    Eur J Neurosci; 2020 Oct; 52(7):3803-3827. PubMed ID: 32537795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Multiple constraints on semantic integration in a hierarchical structure: ERP evidence from German.
    Zhang Y; Jiang X; Saalbach H; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2011 Sep; 1410():89-100. PubMed ID: 21803335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Intersentential syntactic context effects on comprehension: the role of working memory.
    Vos SH; Friederici AD
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 Mar; 16(1):111-22. PubMed ID: 12589896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. N400 and P600 or the role of the ERP correlates in sentence comprehension: some applications to the Italian language.
    Balconi M; Pozzoli U
    J Gen Psychol; 2004 Jul; 131(3):268-302. PubMed ID: 15248594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Semantics does not need a processing license from syntax in reading Chinese.
    Zhang Y; Yu J; Boland JE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):765-81. PubMed ID: 20438271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.